Yeah, I was just thinking that if
they did such a thing then retailers wouldn't be prepared.
Not exact matches
If we lose the fight to stop these pipelines
then I would think the next line of attack would be to both make sure the liberals have
such a bad image in people's minds they will not be re-elected, and more needs to be
done to convince those believing oil and gas are a good
thing that there are better alternatives.
Now if that is not a presidential announcement speech in waiting,
then such a
thing does not exist.
One
thing someone should ask Mr. Prentice is that if Alberta is
such a great province,
then why
did my family have to pay to have my recently deceased mother taken to the morgue?
Then people pull it out of the bank and
do other
things with it
such as investing in gold and other
things.
So applying vision applications to
do other
things, looking at the integrity of packages, the identity of packages, moving down production line and
then also even
doing other applications
such as dimensioning and 3D - type applications and also, in the future potentially, robot bin picking, so to replace people working in warehouses with automation and robotics.
If, on the other hand, he somehow got a glimpse of the fact that I am calling for a biblically grounded and distinctive Christian political philosophy,
then he should have seen that I
do not merely «come precariously close» to trying to
do such a
thing; that is precisely what the book is about.
Well, if you don't have a direct uninteruppted pipeline to the Creator yourself, regular audiences and
such to discuss
things,
then it is kind of pointless to say this is or isn't God's will.
Sorry my delusional friend, but if 40 years of that wasn't enough to come up with any evidence or for Jesus to «touch» me or some
such thing then obviously God doesn't care if I believe in him or not, so why should I care?
I still think we should still go to the church... or maybe a meeting where all the believer can learn from each other, strengthening each other, pray for each other etc, and of course, to worship God together... It is true that sometime I feel that I
do not learn many
thing from the sermon, but, many times, I learn by going to the church, knowing that I will not learn something from the preacher, humble myself to still listen to God and worship Him,,,, it is
such a blessing to hear others testimony about how God works in their life, it is
such an encouragement to see people open up their problem,
then, we can pray about them..
You call for people to be burned to death as easily as breathing and
then deny that you have
done any
such thing.
If I was living on the wrong path leading to death with all the dumb
things I was
doing like listening to bad music, goofing around in class, cussing, acting like I was a gangster, wanting to try drugs, being suicidal and being around with close friends that are
doing the bad
then he can change you too because, I tell you that if you think that your life will go for the worst if you accept them
then you're wrong because, if you have faith in him and you accept him as your savior and follow his ways
then he has your road all planned out, he's going to give you
such blessings and a happiness and love that compares to none others.
There are many
things in your bible that are immoral and are still practiced today,
such as a woman being forced to marry her ra.p.ist, since apparently the «stain» of her no being a virgin is far worse than ra.p.e... all the ra.p.ist has to
do is pay 50 sheckles of silver and the victim is
then forced to marry her attacker... is THAT moral... of course not, but it IS IN YOUR BOOK, and is still practiced today in Morocco.
To appease the gods, we need to
do great
things for them or offer valuable possession to
then,
such as our prize cow, firstborn son, or virgin daughter.
«If there be
such things as feelings at all,
then so surely as relations between objects exist in rerum naturĂ¢, so surely, and more surely,
do feelings exist to which these relations are known» (PP1 245).
When government officials begin to say
such things, as ours clearly have,
then that is the time for challenge, because when a government
does that, it is beginning to play God over our lives, and the taste of
such identification is a very heady
thing.
might readily agree that «we» should resolve to
do these
things — but she is
then left to wonder how to convince those who aren't reading the book and aren't aware of the problem to join in
such resolutions.
If we must use coercion,
then let us know that we are
doing so; let us admit honestly that insofar as this is
done we are not obeying the perfect divine will; let us recognize that at best the use of
such force is a pis - aller, not the entirely right
thing.
If gay marriages is
such a bad
thing,
then why don't we ban lobster dinners too?
Yes i know two counsellors i told one of them about this and i want to know why Jesus Christ without any mercy sends that person to hell forever to suffer and never ever forgives them even though they didn't commit any
thing like murder and that also forever you can forgive that person went in minutes of that sin with in a snap of a finger
then only why that sin why not give him another life in Earth after forgiving and punishing him for the rest of his sin it is said that god and Jesus Is very merciful
then why he is giving
such a life sentence that is much more worse than eternal nothingness and why doesn't he punish Satun with eternal nothingness because i think most of the sins in Earth are committed because of him only?
And yet «god»
then seems complicit in multiplying the offspring from the extramarital affair, which seems odd if this was such a bad thing for Abraham to have done: 9 Then the angel of the LORD told her, «Go back to your mistress and submit to her.&ra
then seems complicit in multiplying the offspring from the extramarital affair, which seems odd if this was
such a bad
thing for Abraham to have
done: 9
Then the angel of the LORD told her, «Go back to your mistress and submit to her.&ra
Then the angel of the LORD told her, «Go back to your mistress and submit to her.»
Thank you and agree with you about all but not about me talking to extremes since no words would change the brainwash they went through by their imams to prepare
then fighting the Russians from Afganistan... It is only responsible for adjusting that mentality is their same programers imams otherwise it would be like talking to a brick wall or tackling a camal... The main
thing is that you are to take a good care of Muslims in the state and never let them grow fears from you or become jobless since
such acts would assist the penetration of extremism in to their mentality... check which branches of Islam you have and mosques they operate and
then read more which of all branches are the most extremes that are to be handled with care, but what I am saying not all branches of Islam be accused of extremes when only a branch or two
doing all the mess.
In the case of completely isolated and independent sayings,
then, the only
thing to
do is to apply the criteria even more carefully;
such sayings will not inspire the same confidence as those demonstrably from the earlier strata, but we may certainly not forejudge them.
But often these passages in the Old Testament will state that the instructions were given by God, and if we read these texts in the light of Jesus,
then we understand that although God was not telling them to
do such things, He nevertheless inspired them to write what they
did so that He could take the blame for their sinful actions.
just
then man
does such things with language as to reinvest this symbol with meanings and dreamed of meanings of terrible force.
Transient emotions every man surely has, but if as a consequence of
such emotions one would
do the terrible
thing which love has sanctified as an immortal exploit,
then all is lost, including the exploit and the bewildered doer of it.
In case Abraham is not a nullity, a phantom, a show one employs for a pastime,
then the fault can never consist in the fact that the sinner wants to
do likewise, but the point is to see how great a
thing it was that Abraham
did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to
such a test.
He who has learned that to exist as the individual is the most terrible
thing of all will not be fearful of saying that it is great, but
then too he will say this in
such a way that his words will scarcely be a snare for the bewildered man, but rather will help him into the universal, even though his words
do to some extent make room for the great.
«Humanists who
do not believe in God or a future life have been in a stronger position to insist on the urgency of making
things better at once, in this [life]... If this is the only life that anybody has,
then the fact that many people must spend it in
such misery becomes more obviously and inexcusably scandalous.
But if God is omniscient, and knows everything you are going to
do before you
do it and is never wrong,
then there is no
such thing as free will.
There appeared to be in me
then, as I find it to be in me now,
such an entire loss of what regards myself, that any of my own interests gave me little pain or pleasure; ever wanting to will or wish for myself only the very
thing which God
does.»
Things such as in the old test
do not commit adultry
then in the new Jesus taught if anyone looks upon a woman to lust they have already commited adultry in their hearts.
How can you hold a conversation with somebody that really believes that his creator wiped out every one of his creations via a flood because he was mad that his creation turned out exactly how he knew it was going to,
then, produced a rainbow because he regretted
doing such a bizarre
thing, even though he knew way beforehand that he was going to regret it but
did it anyway.
But
then... what «reasonable» christian has seen the blind see, the lame walk, the dumb speak or has themselves
done such things as Jesus said, «I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will
do the
things I have been
doing..»
If a person believes that God
does not exist,
then they will most likely also believe that there is no
such thing as heaven or hell, and therefore, this life is all there is.
This is to say,
then, that a Christian world view
does not, except within the broadest limits, dictate any particular understanding of phenomena; indeed, it can properly be said that there is no
such thing as a Christian approach to any field of inquiry — no Christian astronomy or anthropology, for example — just as there is no
such thing as a Marxist, or a democratic humanist, approach to phenomenological inquiry.
Yet Toynbee holds that there may be (as there have been in the past) situations so desperate that the only
thing a person with high standards can
do is to withdraw from them, and that
such detachment is
then the necessary preliminary to effective action on the fourth principle, to which we now pass.
He
then complained to Hitler about his treatment of the Jews, whose Rabbi later said of him, «We
do not believe in saints, but if there is
such a
thing, the first is Metropolitan Andrew.»
When we have deduced what we deduce by our reason and from study of visible nature, and
then read what we read in His inspired word, and find the two apparently discordant, this is the feeling I think we ought to have on our minds» not an impatience to
do what is beyond our powers, to weigh evidence, sum up, balance, decide, and reconcile, to arbitrate between the two voices of God» but a sense of the utter nothingness of worms
such as we are; of our plain and absolute incapacity to contemplate
things as they really are; a perception of our emptiness, before the great Vision of God....
If God is omniscient and chose to
do such and
such a
thing rather than its converse,
then God WOULD N'T change his mind, because he would have already chosen the BEST course of action.
If there was no
such thing as heresy,
then why
does Jesus call the Pharisees a «brood of vipers?»
Then I remembered the little bit of extra mousse I had hidden in the fridge so I could have a little taste later (I know none of you would ever
do such a
thing!).
If I purchase
things that take a long time to prepare,
such as sauces, and make quick eats at home,
then I don't spend all night in the kitchen, and a have what amounts to being a custom - made TV dinner, which is fine by me.
If I purchase
things that take a long time to prepare,
such as sauces, and make quick eats at home,
then I don't spend all night in the kitchen, and a have what amounts to being a custot - made TV dinner, which is fine by me.
if giroud is out for 3 months (acc 2 rumors) & wenger is considering to sign remy / welbeck or cerci
then he has lost it we won't win a
thing this season especially with these players remy was poor against spuds
such players don't deserve to be in our squad rather keep podolski
Afterward he hinted that if Martin (who leads the standings) tried
such a gambit again, he just might put him into the wall, but
then Montoya admitted with a smile that he «would have
done the same
thing» had he been in Martin's position.
Real
does such things bec they more
then a football club.
Asked about
such things, Coss shrugs and says, «I'm not out here trying to change people, but if people are trying to change their lives,
then I
do want to help with that.»
Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all
things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that
things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen
doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as
such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by
then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard
then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can
do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how
does one deal with
such an untenable situation...
do you simply shut - up and hope for the best,
do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them,
do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when
things have ultimately changed,
do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence,
do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or
do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark