Sentences with phrase «do suggest you edit»

Not exact matches

It's tough to do that on accident, suggesting that users frequently have to edit their initial thoughts to get them under the limit.

The sponsor does not edit or influence the content but may have suggested the general topic area.

All I am suggesting is a small edit, I don't see why this should lead to a long argument or why I should refrain from making any suggestion because I don't know enough to fully answer the question.

The response from Nature Methods concludes by outlining several other whole - genome studies that have been published suggesting CRISPR gene - editing does not result in significant off - target effects.

If you don't believe that, may I suggest reading the 2010 book, «The Risks of Prescription Drugs,» Edited by Donald W Light, PhD, Publisher: Columbia University Press.

But as I have no idea yet when I will have the time to edit it, I suggest you subscribe so you don't miss it.

All you have to do is hover over the underlined text and accept or ignore the suggested edits.

Were I to do things over, it's not much of a stretch to suggest that one edit before they even write their first draft.

Before publication, I strongly suggest that the book length be edited to about 300 pages and extraneous material that does nothing to add to the essence of the work be eliminated.

It will go through multiple rounds or edits, even before you hand it over to a professional editor (which I strongly suggest doing).

If you're not comfortable editing the file yourself, or if there is some more intense editing and design that needs to be done, I suggest trying the Author Learning Center.

All editing is done electronically in MS Word using the «track changes» feature, which allows authors to accept, modify, or reject all suggested edits.

Then I do a full page - by - page line edit, which may include surgical and wholesale deletions, shifts and restructuring within sentences, paragraphs, scenes, chapters, suggested new language for transitions, dialogue, visual and sensory description, and other polish as needed.

To do what my agent suggested I would have to get the book written, edited, designed, and published.

I'm aware that with a traditional publisher I would be able to fight suggested edits if I believed they ruined my story, but I don't want to fight.

It is up to us to decide if that editor is correct but this, I remind you, is the time when we put ego and dreams on the back burner and look at our work and the suggested edits with a clear eye and do what needs to be done.

The editing and writing staff at Midnight Publishing wants to suggest that this year is the year you publish that book — and your first step to doing so is contacting us for a book consultation!

After reading this article and the comments, I would suggest incorporating something like the following questions on next year's survey: How much, on average, did you pay for developmental or content editing (improvements to plot points, characters, point - of - view, etc.) of one book?

I hope you'll explain what developmental editors do, as well — how they often start with an author before a word is written, how they support, challenge, and sometimes suggest characters, stories ideas, structure; and how they also line - edit and even suggest new language for character development, dialogue, and other aspects of the literary style.

These are two separate processes and having done both a number of times now, I suggest the quickest way to get your book out there once you have a final edited manuscript is to launch the eBook first.

While I wouldn't suggest doing any heavy duty editing, you're welcome to take notes or jot down any ideas you have for the next step.

While Karin will usually project manage your manuscript at the very least (particularly if it requires structural editing) and will always do a «final» editorial quality check, with your permission she might suggest having your work passed on to one of her trusted, specialist colleagues in order to avoid delays, edit specifically for your genre, or get your book into publication as quickly as possible.

If you have any other comments or edits to suggest, feel free to do so.

I did some light editing and suggested some shortening.

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.

Any time you see a post that needs improvement and are inclined to suggest an edit, you are welcome to do so.

They must understand that they are coaching, not doing — those doing the hiring should be wary of candidates who say they «like editing» or «are really good proofreaders,» as this suggests that these students view the writing center as primarily a place for positivist feedback.

Therefore, it is suggested not to do it every in life and mention the details with sufficient spaces and proper editing.

I didn't sleep well, hustled into the office via a mailbox delivery to my ex's place of the youngest's homework and orange clothes for Harmony Day, listened to a message on my phone from the eldest's school about her fringe being too long (WTF FFS), bolted home after work to let the fur babies inside, bolted back to work for an office dinner (that's the gang in the main pic), realised on the way home that I need to be at a work function on Wednesday morning at 6.30 am... which is the youngest's birthday; had a major panic attack over the youngest waking up parentless on her 11th birthday; sent a frantic message to my ex asking if he could come over at 6.30 am on Wednesday; chatted briefly to an exhausted DD as he drove home from work at 9.30 pm; felt my stomach drop slightly when he said «just don't blog about the howling dogs»; pointed out that those sort of suggested edits needed to be made MUCH earlier to avoid appearing in the blog...