Sentences with phrase «do this about pets»

Of course, the challenge is that most owners assume «my cat is just getting old» and don't realize something can be done about their pets» cognitive decline.

There's not much that you can do about your pet's inherited genes.

Not exact matches

«I had heard about it from Newport Beach and then Peter bought the car here, and then after that was when we kind of got up on it and decided to do it ourselves,» Saszi says.

Peter Karpinski In college, before I was CEO of Sage Restaurant Group, my lacrosse coach and mentor at West Point, Major David Nadeau, told me, «You don't have to worry about the next day if you truly believe in yourself, and can instill those feelings into others.»

In this animated video, Entrepreneur Network partner Peter Voogd explains how you can stop procrastinating and start doing the things you're passionate about.

«I don't know about some of these valuations,» said Peter Falvey, a managing director at Morgan Keegan.

Then do some research about the animal's requirements and risks to make sure it's a suitable pet.

What the jury — and the public — did not know was that Mr. Bollea had a secret benefactor paying about $ 10 million for the lawsuit: Peter Thiel, a co-founder of PayPal and one of the earliest investors in Facebook.

One of the big concerns about comparing Puerto Rico to other blackout events — as Rhodium did in the first chart — is that not every country tracks power data as well as others, and some countries are still electrifying (there are still 1.1 billion people around the world who don't have electricity), explained Peter Marsters, a research analyst at Rhodium.

House Democrats, led by Reps. Ted Lieu of California and Peter Welch of Vermont, also announced Thursday they are planning a broader probe into when other energy companies first understood that fossil fuels drive climate change, what they did with that information and whether they funded or participated in sowing doubt about the matter.

Once the ten - minute pleasantries are done with (wives, kids, colleagues, flight, book recommendations), he'll be telling me about the shower gel in the hotel, or that brand of jacket taking over Italy, his mate's pet insurance or what he learned about eBay's competitors in Africa.

On this episode of Recode Media with Peter Kafka, analyst Rich Greenfield came by the studio to talk about what an industry analyst actually does all day.

They would do anything and I mean anything to prevent deflation setting in and that's what Peter was talking about.

How about peter Cashmore of mashable, Markus fried of plenty of fish they are not hard core affiliate marketers they are just give their readers, helping them to learn something new, engage and meet new people like Markus is doing and the end result is they are the top adsense earners in the world making more than any other so - called pro bloggers in the world.

Jesus gave us a clear picture of what that was all about as did others say Peter for example 2 Peter 2:4 - 6: For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved to judgment; 5And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; 6And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample to those that after should live ungodly;

kendallpeak I'd say that about 90 % of parents end up keeping pets that their children have picked up as strays and fallen in love with, but that doesn't mean that keeping the animal was a sound choice, or will ultimately prove to be.

So just cause Peter followed Christ doesn't mean he was saved he had to have the Spirit to truly follow him which he didn't get til the book of acts so using him denying Christ as an example that's its ok is completely foolish because he didn't have the holy spirit because the spirit is truth and why would it deny itself as being Christ think about that a little bit

Realize as Peter did that it wasn't really about the food and stop calling God's children unclean.

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

In this guest post by Peter Fisher, he provides 17 signs that your ministry may be rotting, and suggests what you can do about it.

How does Peter's question about how many times to forgive -» «Seven times seven?»»

While Peter does teach that baptism saves us, a careful study of the context reveals that Peter is not talking about gaining eternal life and going to heaven when we die.

Peter's joyful reaction to the unexpected faith of Cornelius best describes my reaction to what Scripture says about the unevangelized: «I most certainly understand now that God is not one to show partiality, but in every nation the man who fears Him and does what is right is welcome to Him.»

McKnight does a masterful job defining and defending this understanding of «Gospel» and includes chapters about the Gospel that Jesus preached, the Gospel that Paul preached, and the Gospel that Peter and the other apostles preach, and how this understanding of «Gospel» shows that they all preached, proclaimed, and lived the same gospel.

They don't sacrifice their children, eat their pets or preach about the importance of armed robbery.

I want to provide a little Protestant push - back (against Alexis, not Peter), and to expose a little of my own academic work in Postmodern Conservative, since I actually do not spend all my time philosophizing about pop music!

Then, in the reading from Acts, Peter tells Cornelius about «the word which was proclaimed throughout all Judea, beginning from Galilee after the baptism which John preached: how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power; how he went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil; and God was with him.»

The Christian bishop Papias, writing about 140, states: «Mark who was the interpreter of Peter wrote accurately but not in order all that he remembered of what Christ said and did.

Of course, in the very next paragraph, Jesus was calling Peter «Satan» and telling Peter that he knew nothing about why Jesus had come or what He was doing (Matt 16:23).

In doing so, they make us think hard, again, about how this miraculous liberation took place — something no one expected on October 16, 1978, when a little - known Polish cardinal, who styled himself the pope «from a far country,» was presented on the central loggia of St. Peter's as the new Bishop of Rome.

So like Peter I say, «I don't have any money but I do have prayer, how about that?»

Almost immediately after Peter makes his confession in Matthew 16 about the identity of Jesus, Peter reveals that he doesn't have a clue about why Jesus came to be the Messiah.

I believe that while Jesus died on the cross, and was buried in a tomb, and stayed in the grave for three days, Peter was repenting and wailing and crying about what he had done.

It's a pretty good book, though it seemed to me that the further you got in the book the less it became about discussing interesting ideas about applying Christian ideals in the society we find ourselves in and more it became a lot of his personal prescriptions for what needs to be done and a venting of his worst pet peeves, filled with just a bit to much anger.

For example, Peter said, «We didn't follow cleverly devised tales when we told you about the power and coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His Majesty» (2 Pet.

You make a fool out of yourself with a straw man about married priests though its funny you didn't talk to Peter's wife.

And certainly Peter did not go about giving a historical lecture on the life and teaching of Jesus.

We don't have many details about P and A. To many of us, they're just footnotes in the bigger stories about Paul, Peter, John, and Barnabas.

The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn't Say About Human Origins by Peter Enns — This book came along and just the right time for me.

In the coming weeks, we'll be diving into some excellent books about how to read the Bible — N.T. Wright» sScripture and the Authority of God, Peter Enns» Inspiration and Incarnation, Eugene Peterson's Eat This Book, and more — but before we get there, we've got to do a bit of deconstructing.

What about the Jews» Peter, James, John, and Joseph of Arimathea» who followed Jesus and, to some degree, presumably rejected the trial or at least did not cooperate with it?

At that time he stayed with Peter for a fortnight, and we may presume they did not spend all the time talking about the weather.

And the Jewish people who heard the message of Peter and who wanted to participate with this arrival of the Kingdom of God in Jesus Christ indicated this desire publicly by receiving the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins, just as others had done with John about three years earlier.

Again, this is partly what we see Peter doing in the book of Acts (which I write about in that post linked to above).

The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn't Say About Human Origins by Peter Enns (see my review)

We know this to be true because when in the garden, Peter pulls out his sword to slay the soldier about to take Jesus, and cuts off his ear, what does Jesus say?

I reflect on the incident in the gospel where Peter pointed to another person and asked Jesus» what about him» Jesus answer was, in effect» Don't worry about what I do with him, you just follow me»do with him, you just follow me».

I guess I can probably see Peter doing it — you know, the Peter prior to being called Satan — but then I think about how Jesus might respond to Peter firing a taser.

So when Jesus says that we must be born of Water and Spirit, and if you believe and are baptized you will be saved, I agree with you that in a strict sense God does the saving and we need only immerse (baptize) ourselves in the grace he offers us, I believe that the statement Jesus made about marriage to be applicable, «Therefore what God has joined together, no human being must separate» and echo Peter's rhetorical question, «Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water?

When it was proven that Peter Popoff was using radios to fool people into believing that the Spirit was communicating secrets about his audience to him it could still be argued that he did so to demonstrate God's power.