Lawyer Patrick McKay made this winning entry for Public Knowledge's contest to respond to YouTube's Copyright School video — which is informative about what you can't do with copyrighted works, but falls short on what you can
do under fair use.
Not exact matches
What
does it matter when we die what is important is what we
do with our life now.The struggles people find themselves is because of living a sinful lifestyle you cant play with fire and not get burnt there are consequences.Jesus wants to bring forgiveness and healing and remove the guilt and shame that you are feeling.Ive have been there i was just as guilty i
do nt believe theres a big screen that replays our life if it is it, it will be about what we have
done for God as our sins are covered
under the blood of Jesus.The judgement for christians is that we must give an account of what we
did for Jesus while we were here
did we make the most of opportunities given to tell others to reach out others with his love.Mat 25:14 - 30 the Parable of the talents talks about judgement and for me it is all about what we
do for Jesus the ones who are faithfull in the small things are set over much.The one who
did nt
use his talent that God gave him was punished for his lack of faith.So for those who are struggling with sin and life Jesus loves you and has a plan for your life just trust him to help you and he will.To be
fair its wont be easy you will have to make some hard choices but he promises to help you through its all about choosing him over choosing what we think best because he knows whats best for us.Its important the choice you make as it will impact your life for eternity.brentnz
«Landmark Copyright Decision Defends
Fair Use» (Nate Hoffelder, The Digital Reader blog) A judge has found that Georgia State University librarians» photocopying of materials was indeed legal under the academic provisions of fair use and did not violate copyri
Fair Use» (Nate Hoffelder, The Digital Reader blog) A judge has found that Georgia State University librarians» photocopying of materials was indeed legal under the academic provisions of fair use and did not violate copyrig
Use» (Nate Hoffelder, The Digital Reader blog) A judge has found that Georgia State University librarians» photocopying of materials was indeed legal
under the academic provisions of
fair use and did not violate copyri
fair use and did not violate copyrig
use and
did not violate copyright.
Let's Players interviewed, however, believe what they
do falls
under fair use.
Do you have a source that says specifically these fall
under fair use, preferably with legal precedent?
In 2011 a US District judge ruled against Prince and the Gagosian Gallery, which displayed the photos, stating that Prince's
use of the images
did not fall
under fair use.
Prince is widely seen as having set his own case back by claiming in his 2009 verbal deposition (compiled as a book, Canal Zone Richard Prince YES RASTA: Selected Court Documents, & c., & c., by filmmaker / artist / writer Greg Allen) that «I don't really have a message» or any comment on the originals, which, Cariou's lawyers argued in this case, should be required for protection
under fair use.
Any
use of material in this work that is determined to be «
fair use»
under Section 107 or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law (17 USC, as revised by P.L. 94 - 553)
does not require the Society's permission.
The Patent Act
does not include «
fair dealing» or a personal
use exemption (although it
does allow experiments that relating to the patent
under s. 55 (6)-RRB-.
I don't personally know if this is
done under license,
under a claim of
fair use,
under a mandatory royalty, or on some other basis.
Ten years later, a federal appeals court — the Second Circuit court of appeals — just recently ruled that the project
does not violate copyright laws and is considered
fair use under copyright law and
does not infringe on the rights of its authors.
-LRB-...) CC licenses
do not reduce, limit, or restrict any rights
under exceptions and limitations to copyright, such as
fair use or
fair dealing.
The McCain campaign argued that their
use of news broadcasts falls
under fair use, however once YouTube suspects that something is pirated content, it follows the letter of the law to make sure that it doesn't face liability, removing the video in question and waiting for 10 - 14 days before reinstating it, even if a valid counternotice is filed.
It's not subject to the licensing foibles and access restrictions of streaming, and DVR falls
under fair use, just like it
does with cable channels.
This year's trial focused on only one issue:
does Google's
use of these specific 37 APIs fall
under fair use?
After the overturning of U.S. District Judge William Alsup's ruling that APIs can't be copyrighted, Google claimed that what they had
done should be considered «
fair use» and still legal
under the ruling of the appellate court.
I don't have to put up with my husband not
doing his
fair share of the housework (actually, we were both equally crap at that), not being involved enough as a parent (erm, I was the one being caned for not
doing enough craft with the kids), leaving his fingernail clippings piled on the arm of the sofa (geez that
used to get on my goat) and hogging the bed covers (that wasn't a problem either, he was a lizard shivering
under the doona while I constantly had a bare leg sticking out to cool down).