Sentences with phrase «do upon renewal»

The biggest problem I see with the term policy is what to do upon renewal.

Not exact matches

Moreover, the resurgent forces of conservatism within America, upon which Romney must rely to get elected and which plan to hold him to account if he becomes president (namely the Tea Party and their ilk) do not appear to have much appetite for a renewal of American adventurism abroad.

If you do not qualify for the Radisson Rewards Visa Signature ® Card, you will be considered for the Radisson Rewards Platinum Rewards Visa ® Card which has different terms set forth here and earns 50,000 points after first purchase, plus an additional one - time spend bonus of 10,000 points after spending at least $ 1,500 in net purchases on the card within the first 90 days of account opening, earns 25,000 points each year upon renewal of the card, earns 6 points per $ 1 spent on net purchases at Radisson Family of Hotels and 3 points per $ 1 spent in eligible net purchases everywhere else, and may not offer the same Visa Signature benefits.

For those of us who applied mid year 2017 for the Surpass, do we still get a free weekend night upon renewal?

Upon registration, a trade mark proprietor must show use of their mark to maintain that registration, and that use must be demonstrated upon renewal — I do not see a problem with tUpon registration, a trade mark proprietor must show use of their mark to maintain that registration, and that use must be demonstrated upon renewal — I do not see a problem with tupon renewal — I do not see a problem with this.

Something has to be done, but many practitioners will suggest that the oral renewal process is a vital fallback upon refusal on paper and will feel aggrieved that the problems and proposed restrictions actually derive from other policy decisions which gain no mention.

However, they do review your driving record periodically, usually upon policy renewal time, and then will use their own demerit system to hike your rates based on your infractions.

It will be difficult to dispute the agreed value (because you didn't actually «agree») at the time you make a claim if you have not raised this with the insurer upon receiving your renewal notice.

And don't forget to check over your policy for any errors when you first get it and then update your information upon renewal.

Most people don't realize it but there is a hefty commission fee paid from our premiums even upon renewal when it just automatically happens without the consumer ever once speaking with their broker or their broker even having to solicit the renewal (I speak mostly of auto & home here).

Upon renewal or in any lease extension add an increase of a percentage and add amend the agreement at that time (if it wasn't done in the original) that at every lease extension or renewal rent will increase by a set percentage.

42 DOS 99 Matter of Smadar - failure to pay judgment; failure to appear at hearing; unearned commission; ex partehearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; denial of renewal of license due to failure to pay judgment; applicant fails to appear and establish that he is qualified to be licensed; application for brokers license denied

214 DOS 97 Matter of DOS v. Laymon - accounting to client; bad check; deposits; failure to pay judgments; proper business practices; jurisdiction; DOS retains jurisdiction after expiration of license (for failure to pay renewal fee) where acts occurred during licensure; violation of 19 NYCRR 175.1 by depositing clients» funds into operating account and failing to maintain special bank account; violation of 19 NYCRR 175.2 for failing to account to client; broker engaged in fraudulent practices by accepting monies he was required to retain in escrow, depositing said monies into his operating account, failing to return same to its rightful owner and by purporting to make refunds by issuing bad checks; in light of broker's financial inability to do so, failure to promptly satisfy judgments was not a demonstration of untrustworthiness; there was no violation of 19 NYCRR 175.3 (b) where broker was not managing rental properties; real estate broker's license revoked; reapplication for broker's license conditioned upon proof of payment of restitution with interest and proof of satisfaction of judgment with interest

107 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Sosis - subject matter jurisdiction; due process; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; deposits; fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction if at the time the disciplinary proceeding was commenced by proper service of a notice of hearing and complaint the party was (i) licensed to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (ii) an applicant for either a license or for the renewal of a license to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (iii) eligible to automatically renew the prior license under the two - year limitation provision of RPL § 441 (2); ex parte hearing is permissible upon proof of proper notice of hearing; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restitution

7 DOS 00 DOS v. Flagship Marketing Group - availing of license; failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; jurisdiction; proper business practices; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS retains jurisdiction over party not licensed at the time of the hearing where, at that time the complaint was served, the party was (i) licensed, (ii) an applicant for a license or renewal, or (iii) was eligible to automatically renew; salesperson is prohibited both from owning, directly or indirectly, singly or jointly, any shares of voting stock in and from being an officer of any licensed real estate brokerage corporation with which the salesperson is associated; representative real estate broker availed the corporate broker license to an associated salesperson where the office was operated by the salesperson without the direct supervision of the representative broker and the salesperson conducted business as a broker for his own benefit; representative real estate broker engaged in fraud by availing the corporate real estate broker license to a salesperson; representative broker's availing of corporate broker's license for which the corporate broker is vicariously liable; failure to provide business records constitutes failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; DOS fails to establish fraud, ignorance or negligence is not sufficient to prove mistake; pressure, regardless of how severe, is not undue influence; restitution denied where funds sought were received by an entity not named or charged in the complaint; corporate broker fined $ 3,000.00, representative broker's license revoked and fined $ 3,000.00 and salesperson fined $ 5,000.00

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained

CRC # 98 - 523 Matter of DOS v. Hazor, Consent Order - default decision (122 DOS 98) re-opened upon motion to vacate; license revocation for failure to disclose in renewal applications that corporate broker had been dissolved by proclamation and continued to operate for purposes other than winding up its corporate affairs is annulled; licenses reinstated upon payment of $ 2,000.00 fine

REM: Does the difference between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar — even though they're inching closer — mean that, for example, Canadian brokers will now be paying higher franchise fees upon renewal?