Sentences with phrase «do weather science»

Not exact matches

Do It Yourself Weather Vane from Steve Spangler Science — Craft a homemade weather vane with the kids, and then be sure to test it out (with a fan or outside on a windy day).

Pine Cone Weather Station from Science Sparks — Did you know that pine cones can help predict the weather?

Don't forget about the latest Challenge and Discover theme: weather science.

Trained to do chemistry and atmospheric sciences research, Knighton weathered the 1999 recession by branching out from his lab to work part - time on a MSU program called «BOREALIS,» funded by NASA to promote science education.

The study, published in open - access journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science, also shows that the dogs did not suffer from a buildup of electrolytes from the drink, suggesting that electrolyte drinks are a safe hydration alternative for sniffer dogs, who are at risk of heat stroke in hot weather.

They show that astronomy is a science that is accessible to everyone, and I would encourage you to take a look if the weather is clear... but do follow the safety advice!»

«Our results show that Earth has had a moderate temperature through virtually all of its history, and that is attributable to weathering feedbacks — they do a good job at maintaining a habitable climate,» said first author Joshua Krissansen - Totton, a UW doctoral student in Earth and space sciences.

The U.S. press is either woefully ignorant of the state of the science, or is deliberately trying to find explanations for various regional weather and climate changes that don't involve any mention of «global warming» — and that approach relies on the «natural cycle» argument.

«Misconceptions about climate science are rife with those who confuse weather with climate... the presence of large El Nià ± o events before 1850 AD does not mean that climate change has no effect.»

Then I always check the weather (while I give my skincare a minute to settle in) followed by doing my makeup: Sweet Science tinted SPF, Jouer bronzer, Trestique concealer, Make blush, LOC eyeshadow (or sometimes Benefit's Big Beautiful Eyes) and finally, Benefit Cosmetics» mascara.

I should probably do a better job at looking at the weather forecasts, being that I'm in the atmospheric sciences program and all.

And they do all of this while immersed in a field - science program that asks them to be multidisciplinary scientists drawing on prior knowledge to interact with a variety of environments, weather, and physical challenges of a mountain environment.

Science kits, containing compasses, weather instruments, magnifying glasses, soil samples, plastic containers for experiments, and more, give pupils another opportunity to learn by doing.

At Pinnacle High School, Michaels Near Space Team is one of only a handful of programs in the country that do high altitude science and fly payloads to the edge of space via weather balloons.

Find Ways to Focus on Weather in the Classroom Meteorology isn't a part of a core curriculum, however, most science classes do include lesson plans on weather and the atmosphere.

There's been a lot of noise about extreme weather the past few months, and it frustrates me, because I think that too much jumping up and down about it does a disservice to the science, and to future expectations of immediate, in - your - face evidence of climate change.

For an example of how that «citizen science» can really work, look at what Ron Broberg and Zeke Hausfeather are doing with the weather station data — they aren't sitting around declaring that «it can't be done» or that the GISTEMP / CRU / NCDC methods are fixed, they are going into the data, making choices, seeing what impact they have and determining what is robust.

As far back as the 1950's, when instructional science filmmaking was in its heyday, Frank Capra did a film on weather and climate that included a section on carbon dioxide and global warming that plays like a compressed version of «An Inconvenient Truth,» replete with flooded American landscapes and crumbling ice sheets.

I guess in the end, extreme weather and climate will do all the talking while correct science the only worth while explaining.

-- Of course, we all must realize that absent something we don't all know about (or the methane shock troops being right, which the science does not appear to support; while faintly agreeing that increased methane can't be good it appears the more knowledgeable sorts are saying the quantities are out of whack for going all shock - horror on it just yet, while other problems multiply and are bad enough without giving ourselves nightmares), the weather is going to return to something more like normal in the next couple of years.

While opinions about climate change vary greatly, even among experts in climate science, the consensus is that short - range weather events have little to do with the climate change debate.

One does not have to be skeptical about the science of global warming to be skeptical of excessively «certain» long term predictions that involve weather and climate, the ultimate chaotic system that can not be accurately predicted.

If you believe the science, then nothing you can do will change the weather of the next few decades 2.

«With global temperatures hitting a new record high and repeated episodes of severe weather, including flooding in this country, helping people to understand the basic science behind climate change as well as the consequences for our nature, our businesses and food supply feels like an important thing to do.»

Science Corrupted: It's «the hottest year on record», as long as you don't take its temperature — Activist James Hansen's claims based on «pure conjecture» — Hansen's Climate Con: «The parts of the world which GISS shows to be heating up the most are so short of weather stations that only 25 per cent of the figures are based on actual temperature readings»

Also See: Watch Now: Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News Mocking «Climate Astrology»: «This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar» — Morano: «There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming»

One bit science you didn't mention was examination of weather stations, this was enabled by use of a blog.

Whether this source is NOAA, foreign weather observatories, or international climate bodies is irrelevant — the author is never a primary source of data unless he is performing experiments, and anyone who has done real science understands this.

They really do have the weather modification down to the science.

This week's article headlines regarding climate / energy policies, science and weather do not disappoint - rest lightly, the craziness continues.

Mr. Wagner, of course, does not mention other historical publications from Popular Science (and other sources) that fully acknowledge the weather warfare reality and the greats posed by it (going back nearly 7 decades).

To make a resounding judgement that makes it as though he is saying that the recent up tick in severe weather had nothing to do with climate change implies a settled science on the matter.

What am I doing wrong in trying to get folks on both sides (ugh) of the discussion to understand that if climate includes (is defined by) weather (patterns) and we have accuracy issues with weather forecasting, how are those of us w / o science degrees to trust forecasting climate?

For example, weather reporters do not generally have expertise in climate science, and have much less scientific training than climate scientists.

How well do you think the UK media covers the topic of climate science and the related topic of weather as well?

As Science Digest reported in 1973, «At this point we do not have the comfortable distance of tens of thousands of years to prepare for the next Ice Age, and that how carefully we monitor our atmospheric pollution will have direct bearing on the arrival and nature of the weather crisis.»

Interesting that someone that claims that ``... Cosmic rays influence our weather...» doesn't understand that the science of whether or not GCR's have any impact is actually the thing in question, with only very limited observational support for the idea so far and good reasons for why it is unlikely to be a big factor.

Current GCM models may have realistic - seeming weather patterns, but are totally incapable of producing phenomena that look like the Holocene (Little Ice Age, Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Holocene Optimum, the steady decline of temperature on average over the last 3,000 years, etc.) The Climate Science community has, instead, taken the path of trying to claim that these swings didn't occur (Michael Mann's «Hockey Stick», etc.) This does not give me a lot of confidence in the rest of their «science&Science community has, instead, taken the path of trying to claim that these swings didn't occur (Michael Mann's «Hockey Stick», etc.) This does not give me a lot of confidence in the rest of their «science&science».

Boykoff observed that in the mind of the public, local weather forecasters — many of whom do not have a science degree — have as much credibility on climate issues as experts.

There are several categories for members, but even for general members, they do not have to have done any original research and may only have had some bare minimum of education on actual climate science, perhaps having a focus on weather forecasting.

The astonishing weather experienced by the world last year and advances in climate science demonstrate conclusively that fossil fuel emissions are causing global warming — and something must be done about it.

And meteorology degrees may not even help, as they typically do not require coursework in climate change science — though of course that shouldn't stop meteorologists and weather communicators from accepting the consensus of their more rigorously climate science — focused colleagues.

So what does climate science tell us about the links between climate change and extreme weather and what impact is this likely to have on future events?

His comment shows the president doesn't understand the difference between climate and weather or the history and basics of climate science.

Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News Mocking Gore's «Climate Astrology»: «This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar» — Morano: «There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens «proves» their case... Man - made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope» — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming»

While the average earthly temperature does climb in correlation to the amount of atmospheric carbon, people tend to rely on their observations of the weather to validate or repudiate the science behind climate change.

Further adding to the divide within the climate science community is the fact that many of the climate models that Trenberth and others often use do not show the sorts of changes in the jet stream that the new study and others like it have pointed to, including the more frequently stagnated or «blocked» weather patterns that Francis cited.

If this «settled science» claim «weather IS NOT climate» does NOT exist, Mr Tobis might want to refute these mis - informed people as well:

I do follow this debate from a layman's perspective and the one thing I find really confusing is why when talking about climate science / climate change and the models being used, they never talk about weather modification programs that have been going on for over 70 years around the world.

What the paper does focus on, Hansen said, is determining whether extreme weather events like the Texas heat wave can be attributed to climate variability — the natural ups and downs in seasonal temperature — or to the global upward trend in summer temperatures that science now links with climate change.