Sentences with phrase «do with human evolution»

Parker doesn't say, but this sounds like a rehash of the old creationist canard that Dubois eventually decided that the Java Man skullcap was just a giant gibbon and nothing to do with human evolution.

«Many lines of evidence indicate that Darwinius has nothing at all to do with human evolution,» says Chris Kirk, associate professor of anthropology at The University of Texas at Austin.

A maxillary molar from the same site is a pliopithecid (primitive higher primates that are neither apes nor Old World monkeys), so this site in Germany has nothing whatsoever to do with human evolution.

«This site in Germany has nothing whatsoever to do with human evolution.»

In my view, this has a lot to do with human evolution, survival, and thus reproductive success.

Not exact matches

You're talking about the type of «evolution» that we always knew existed and to make matters worse you're bragging about the advancements made by INTELLIGENT HUMAN BEINGS which still don't even come close to the complication of macro evolution but still required thousands of years of scientific advancement and knowledge and a team of researchers with high iq's working aroudn the clock with microscopes.

Of course the sequencing is not quite right, because the poem was written / inspired (take your pick) before science did its work.But the intuitive observer could see a clear evolution form plants to animals to human life, with continuities and differentiations.

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

(Answers: 1) because they lived and died millions of years before humans and extant forms; 2) because humans and dinosaurs never coexisted; 3) this simply didn't happen, but the creationist response is apparently, and ironically, «hyper - evolution» from severely bottle - necked gene pools; and 4) because we share a common ancestor with egg - laying organisms)

Evolution has nothing to do with understanding human emotions or sociological explanations for how people live.

First, you sound a little unsure about how a computer works, and secondly nuclear energy has nothing to do with evolution, unless you are looking into creating mutant humans and animals.

Organisms with a spine do not automatically become human, human isn't the goal of vertebrate evolution.

What I'm really going to do is to rid the gene pool of its 10,000 worst contributors, in an effort to speed up the evolution of the human race (yes: I made the system automatic, so that I didn't have to bother diddling with it at every moment: Darwin was right, but the process turned out slower than I expected, and I got bored, hence the urge to speed things up a tad).

The term moderate evolution might therefore be applied to a theory which simply inquires into the biological reality of man in accordance with the formal object of the biological sciences as defined by their methods and which affirms a real genetic connection between that human biological reality and the animal kingdom, but which also in accordance with the fundamental methodological principles of those sciences, can not and does not attempt to assert that it has made a statement adequate to the whole reality of man and to the origin of this whole reality.

To get a proper and adequate understanding of human freedom, one has to see man in the total context of evolution, for freedom did not start with man; it had its evolutionary roots at the infrahuman level.

I maintained that, contrary to the commonly expressed or tacitly accepted view, the era of active evolution did not end with the appearance of the human zoological type: for by virtue of his acquirement of the gift of individual reflection Man displays the extraordinary quality of being able to totalize himself collectively upon himself, thus extending on a planetary scale the fundamental vital process which causes matter, under Certain conditions, to organize itself in elements which are ever more complex physically, and psychologically ever more centrated.

Has nothing to do with actual fossils that demonstrate an evolution of a single species over time; whether dogs, cats, monkeys, birds, or humans.

We do not deny or circumscribe the Creator, because we hold he has created the self - acting originating human mind, which has almost a creative gift; much less then do we deny or circumscribe His power, if we hold that He gave matter such laws as by their blind instrumentality moulded and constructed through innumerable ages the world as we see it... Mr Darwin's theory need not then be atheistical, be it true or not; it may simply be suggesting a larger idea of Divine Prescience and Skill... At first sight I do not see that «the accidental evolution or organic beings» is inconsistent with divine design - It is accidental to us, not to God.»

Generis: «For these reasons the Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics added].

If it is true that, bound by the collective interaction of its liberties, the human social group can not escape from certain irreversible laws of evolution, does this mean that, observed along its axis of «greatest complexity» (i.e. increasing liberty) the World is coiling upon itself with as much sureness as it is in other respects radiating outwards and explosively expanding?

Pope Pius XII declared that «the teaching authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions... take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter --[but] the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» (Pius XII, Humani Generis 36)»

why don't you start with why humans invented religion in the first place, the origins of the books of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history of time, fossil evidence of evolution of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible, knowledge of all the gods that humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses of christianity in the time of it's origin, the fact that every other religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part of the world you would be a different religion and going to «hell», and that a good, kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.

The size of the human brain expanded dramatically during the course of evolution, imparting us with unique capabilities to use abstract language and do complex math.

Just as belittling Darwin and Chomsky personally does not really rebut their science, condemning Wolfe's rhetorical juvenility does not confront the substance of his thesis — that humans invented speech (and subsequent forms of language derived from it)-- and that evolution had nothing to do with it.

Intermixing does not surprise paleoanthropologists who have long argued on the basis of fossils that archaic humans, such as the Neandertals in Eurasia and Homo erectus in East Asia, mated with early moderns and can be counted among our ancestors — the so - called multiregional evolution theory of modern human origins.

He performs a difficult balancing act with aplomb, telling the story of human evolution through an accurate and unsparing narrative of what scientists actually thought and did.

This approach allowed them to determine when HSV - 1 and HSV - 2 were introduced into humans with far more precision than standard models that do not account for natural selection over the course of viral evolution.

These findings suggest that self - control may not be a crowning psychological achievement of human evolution and indeed may have nothing to do with self - awareness.

In the classroom, Eric rarely deals with human evolution, and therefore doesn't feel the conflict between his teachings and his personal beliefs, but if a student questions them, he lets them know they're free to choose.

The account of the players and theories in the field of human evolution does highlight how much of the debate involves mere name games, with lumpers and splitters arguing ad nauseam about the same few specimens widely scattered through space and time.

Although the past does not predict future evolution, a greater integration with technology and genetic engineering may catapult the human brain into the unknown.

They argued that his bones provided the answer to a long - standing and delicate question about human evolution: did our ancestors interbreed with Neanderthals?

The scientists therefore are wondering if the Ethiopia and Kenya finds were one offs, with the cultures not spreading outside of those populations, or if the tool «technologies» did indeed spread and evolve, marking the dawn of a whole new transformative era in the evolution of our distant human - like cousins.

At least the present AiG writers have not stooped to quoting Zuckerman, who has hitherto been the other anatomist that creationists have deigned to acknowledge as an expert on human evolution; but they have not come to terms with Oxnard's own evolving views, and continue to cite him as if he still thought the same as he did 15 years ago or more.

11 Warrener, A.G., et al. «A Wider Pelvis Does Not Increase Locomotor Cost in Humans, with Implications for the Evolution of... continue Overall, female runners demonstrate greater hip adduction, hip internal rotation, and knee abduction than men which can lead to more strain on the knee joint and surrounding connective tissues.

And if you want to get into evolution humans have learnt how to manipulate fire to make synthetic substances and cook foods which is why we do nt walk around with gorilla bellies.

What if the future bends inevitably toward «enhanced» books that do provide pleasure for eyes and ears more in tune with millions of years of human evolution?

Sharks do not want to attack humans as a general rule, but they have 300 million years of predatory evolution behind them, so do the same thing with sharks each time, every time.

Human beings do possess a unique higher intelligence than our animal counterparts; this is gifted to us by nature, for use toward our own preservation and (dare I say, evolution)-- but only in harmony with our environment.

I hear from liberals who claim to believe in evolution but don't actually accept that a history of random variation and natural selection is of relevance in thinking about human behavior: as with Scopes, the only part of evolution they believe is that it contradicts the Bible.

Perhaps the fire frequency was a function of population density, cultural practices innovations, or other human - based factors that had nothing to do with temperature, such as war, peace, displacement, entrenchment, food preference shifts, food availability changes, evolution in customs, advances in ecological knowledge, population growth, etc..

Our evolution works against the long time frame as «humans did not need to know what the local climate would be like a century into the future» as «they were much more concerned with the necessities of the here and now, and had little time or inclination to ponder the abstract world.»

How do you square that conclusion with the undeniable facts of evolution and natural selection which have no «agenda» other than the survival and reproduction of animals, and, in our case, of the Great Apes and humans?

Agree, and what can help drive that is a science establishment and a political norm that treats people with respect and does not manipulate our rather weak animal brains (we are genetically very close to all other mammals, who is surprised a dog runs in a pack — then you shouldn't be surprised humans do too)-- of course I truly believe that is beyond us and our current limited evolution, we are just talkin» dogs — so... lets dream on and hope we can get better despite our great organic limitations.

The project doesn't only look at nature for solutions to purely human problems, pitting millions of years of evolution against our puny attempts, it also combines the beauty of our most advanced technology with the strengths of some of the smartest animals on earth.