Not exact matches
A
person's military affiliation has nothing to
do with their political,
religious, or societal views.
Even if one's religion requires prayer at rigidly specific intervals or times or
with items that not everyone may be familiar
with, where
do those
religious procedures say that the praying
persons aren't allowed to let the
people around them know what it is that they are
doing?
First,
people often kill other human beings because they believe that the creator of the universe wants them to
do it... Second, far greater numbers of
people fall into conflict
with one another because they define their moral com.munity on the basis of their
religious affiliation...»
If
religious people don't have their totally invented delusional fantasies like «The Invisible Man In The Sky» and «Atheists Are Angry», then they would have to deal
with the real world as it actually is.
They would be on much better intellectual and moral ground if they just allowed for the fact that yes, the
religious Jews had Jesus killed so that they could protect their authority, but that as much to
do with modern Jewish
people as the Romans killing the Maccabees has to
do with modern Italians — it's utterly irrelevant.
But believe anything that can give u
with full eveidence ex: science
with evidences All
religious books are just a «bully» only to common
people to believe for not
doing any bad things & live as a human only (not as animals).
How
do you argue
with people who are so insane that they think your very existence somehow infringes on «their
religious freedom»?
But the claim
with which Keister begins her study» that a
person's
religious beliefs will exert some influence on whether he will pursue material wealth and how he will go about
doing so» seems eminently reasonable.
Funny, you don't seem to have a problem
with all of the
religious people doing the very same thing all over this country.
Some athiests are just as bad as the fundimentalists... because they «know» I being and agnostic, however, take issue
with anyone who says that
people who are not
religious do not think... in fact, it has been found that statistically, athiests and agnostics know the bible better than christians.
This very big book is an excellent guide to pertinent laws and regulations, prepared by
people associated
with the Rutherford Institute, which
does important work in defending
religious freedom.
It has nothing really to
do with religious faith - it has to
do with people's ability, in their final hours or days, to see love as way to understand their life and their relationships and find some comfort in that understanding.
I don't know all that much about God, but I know this is the root of the problem
with religious people.
Live and let die, live and let live,
religious people do neither as we can see
with our own eyes every day.
So many
religious well intended
people want to impress God and religion upon others
with various beliefs and arguments that include you will, «burn in hell if you don't» or other not so harsh or threatening consequences.
My great question of the day is why
does the God of the
religious right and his followers seem ubiquitously obsessed
with other
people's sex lives?
I
do not see any of the
religious folks
with much in the way of good things to say about gay
people.
You don't think that
people can be brainwashed into a belief system
with the more subtle indoctrination techniques used by
religious organizations and have it stick?
I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other
religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up
with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as
with those who label themselves as athiest...
It's to the point
with some Christian posters here that any criticism of their actions and
religious beliefs garners the immediate judgment that the
person doing so is being hateful when, in reality, they are only fulfilling that very same Bible observation made by Jesus.
By the way, the Secular West gave you that computer you are typing on: if it had been up to
people in Asia, you would still be
doing foot - binding, adding
with an abacus, all
with at least as much cultural and
religious arrogance as in the West.
Buhhda, I will STFU when
people stop coming to my door
with their
religious BS and refuse to leave, Ivan, Where
do you get your data?
Confession time here: although I don't usually end up at places such as drunken parties, stripper bars and porn shops while hanging out
with friends, since those activities and places hold little appeal for me, I know I need to stay away from certain «
religious»
people, those who seem to love only themselves and who seem hell - bent on being nasty to
people they describe as «sinners», supposedly in the name of truth - telling.
And especially after the Noachian Flood,
did false religion take a leap,
with false
religious doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments
people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a
religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to
do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.
So how, in a society like the United States where the right of an individual to worship or not worship the God they choose is a fundamental and constitutional right,
does a
religious person reconcile the sense of preeminence
with a pluralistic culture?
Religious people rejoice in these stats, as it shows that only 3 - 5 % of
people may if they
do nt change not get the experience of paradise
with God.
You'll quickly discover that, some
people's opinion, he doesn't have a «relationship»
with God because he doesn't possess the correct «
religious» understanding.
Actually, many
people seem to think that a lot of
people who attend church
do not follow Jesus, but merely attend church for their own reasons, such as needing some sort of
religious system to identify
with.
Once upon a time
people were happy enough
with their
religious faith and
did not have to boast about proof....
In interviews
with CNN,
religious leaders from Newtown, the site of last year's school shooting where 20 children and six adults were killed, said that a recent gun control agreement
does not
do enough to fight gun violence, leading one rabbi to doubt whether Congress was actually working for the American
people.
They think they are following God, but in reality, they are under the influence of
religious rules, regulations, and requirements that have less to
do with God than
with some
person's attempt to gain cash, credit, or control for themselves.
It wasn't the summer that brought an end to my doubt, but it was the summer I encountered a different Jesus, a Jesus who requires more from me than intellectual assent and emotional allegiance; a Jesus who associated
with sinners and infuriated the
religious; a Jesus who broke the rules and refused to cast the first stone; a Jesus who gravitated toward sick
people and crazy
people, homeless
people and hopeless
people; a Jesus who preferred story to exposition and metaphor to syllogism; a Jesus who answered questions
with more questions, and demands for proof
with demands for faith... a Jesus who healed each
person differently and saved each
person differently; a Jesus who had no list of beliefs to check off, no doctrinal statements to sign, no surefire way to tell who was «in» and who was «out»; a Jesus who loved after being betrayed, healed after being hurt, and forgave while being nailed to a tree; a Jesus who asked his disciples to
do the same...
To paraphrase Jesus» comment,
people who are concerned only
with the affairs of this world often show more ingenuity in seeking their ends than
religious people do in trying to accomplish God's will.
I have actually been banned from a few «religion is always bad» atheist blogs as I try to show them that most
people's religions have very little to
do with right belief — even though their
religious professionals may wish otherwise.
And just what kind of buffoon
do you think would believe in something
with can not be proven??? Oh right,
religious people, sorry I forgot about them.
Only a
religious person could think that gay
people fighting for marriage rights has anything to
do with religion.
Why don't believers respect that it is a government business meeting, and not waste the
peoples time
with a
religious display.
Or could these be informed
people who actually see what Obama is trying to
do to this country what
with SOPA and his wanting to enforce martial law in America... Surely it isn't just
religious people who see this... In fact, if you read news outside of CNN and Fox, you see just how bad Obama really is
In other words, they intended the U.S. to be a safe haven for
people to practice their faith or lack thereof without government interference — as long as the
religious didn't interfere
with the secular.
- LIE Atheists
do not really exist, they just pretend that they don't believe in God and argue
with religious people.
† Atheists
do not really exist, they just pretend that they don't believe in God and argue
with religious people.
Yet the draft describes wide - ranging protections, saying, «
Persons and organizations
do not forfeit their
religious freedom when providing social services, education, or healthcare; earning a living, seeking a job, or employing others; receiving government grants or contracts; or otherwise participating in the marketplace, the public square, or interfacing
with federal, state, or local governments.»
I certainly have not
done any sort of scientific research into this segment of the population, but I work in an environment where I get to interact
with a lot of
religious and non-
religious people, and I have had countless conversations
with people who probably count as one of the 35 million
people who used to attend church and identify as Christian, but no longer
do.
Our churches, whose steeples dot every cityscape and small town in the land, are exempt from paying taxes, and unlike many
people of other faiths, we don't have to worry about fighting
with our employers to take time off to celebrate our
religious holidays as they are largely taken for granted.
I don't have a problem
with the general idea that there is much we don't know about the universe and reality, the problem is when
people... «spiritual» or «
religious»....
You ignorant
person, don't you know the bible and other
religious works are written by men from a long time ago who hated women except to procreate
with them and have them serve them as their slaves?
All you
people with religious beliefs had better sit down and consider how the real world works and how your belief system fits in, rather than the other way around, like you've been
doing.
The fact that many
people are surprised by this now probably has a lot to
do with their lack of
religious education or curiousity.
I don't care if
people agree
with my
religious beliefs, what I
do care about is that they know I don't sacrifice babies or engage in homilies to Satan during ritual.
So why
do people with religious experiences assert that their feelings of God's presence are valid and believable, but when another
person who has never experienced God admits this, they are told that they...