Sentences with phrase «do with solid evidence»

You have written recently about sensitivity bifurcation and deep ocean warming, both of which have little to do with solid evidence [yet] of one thing or another.

An attempt at clarification about: «deep ocean warming... [having] little to do with solid evidence (yet).»

Not exact matches

They're already more paranoid than ever (with solid evidence) that their money can't last as long as they do.

@Timothy — I don't recall using any foul, or even abusive words; unless you consider disagreeing with you, based on solid evidence, as being hurtful.

Fantasy is a pleasant distraction, and sometimes daydreaming even produces ideas which bring solid results, but to live there in that fantasy world, with no evidence of any glimmer of reality to it, just doesn't work.

Again, that's just my gut speaking with no real solid evidence to back it up, but I don't think it is likely that a coach like Woods who has known this personnel as long as he has would be trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.

As they do so, it is critical they choose interventions with solid evidence of improving student achievement.

There's nothing wrong with arguing that the unemployed should receive more generous benefits, but this has hardly anything to do with education; it's certainly not a conclusion based on solid evidence, which Rothstein is always sure to demand of those who don't agree with him.

The issue isn't that you're complaining so much as the fact that after that TEASER of a trailer, you don't have JACK SHIT for solid evidence that there's anything to complain ABOUT (and if you start bitching about style again, somebody should bash your head in with a Mega Drive)

I can certainly understand that there are differing scientific views about CIs and error ranges and measures of probability — but categorical statements such a yours, that «solid evidence» doesn't exist, don't wash with me.

Among Republican registered voters who agree with the Tea Party, fully 70 % do not think there is solid evidence that the average temperature on earth is warming.

Many families do not adhere to recommendations advanced by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and the World Health Organization (WHO) that infants be fed only breast milk or formula for the first 4 to 6 months of life.1 — 4 Although the health consequences associated with the early introduction of complementary foods are controversial, 5 — 8 there is evidence that early introduction of solid foods may increase infants» risk of enteric infections, allergic reactions, obesity, choking, and food aversion.9 — 13 Complementary foods are often high in protein, raising questions about the consequences of high protein intakes on growth and obesity.14 In addition, early complementary feeding does not increase the likelihood of nighttime sleeping15 and may increase the likelihood of feeding disorders, especially if parents introduce developmentally inappropriate food or feeding techniques before children have acquired the necessary neuromuscular skills.16, 17

In fact, a number of experts have solid evidence that kids who can't live with their parents do better in homes with relatives.