Sentences with phrase «do with the bodies»

You wouldn't take short cuts with your business and you shouldn't do it with your body.

«We live in a free country and we are not going to tell you what you can and can not do with your body, that's not our job as employers.»

Some of the most basic communication elements have little to do with body language at all.

The fuel you put into your body is just as important as what you do with your body.

Bottom line is this, keep it out of the public square; learn to respect others beliefs / disbeliefs; stop trying to tell LGBT they are wrong; stop trying to tell women what they can and can't do with their bodies; stop trying to push bogus creationism crap (backed with zero evidence) on innocent children in the public school system; just stop pushing it outside your home or church.

It's easier for someone who can just drop a load and have no further contribution to tell those that end up doing all the work what they should and shouldn't do with their bodies.

You DO N'T get a say in whatever any other woman does with her body, no matter how personally repugnant you find it.

What a woman does with her body is between her and her Doctor, not her and an imaginary, vidictive - murderer - rapist - child abusing god.

Attempting to probe into the core of the privacy right, the court oddly concluded that essentially privacy has to do with bodies.

If a church can not tell its flock «what to do with my body,» as the saying goes, with regard to contraception, then other uses of that body will quickly prove to be similarly off - limits to ecclesiastical authority.

Do you have the right to tell others what they can and can not do with their bodies, and why do you think you have this authority?

When did «religious freedom» become synonymous with «free to tell others how to live, free to discriminate, free to dictate to women what to do with their bodies, free to attempt to create a theocracy, free to make laws based on your religion, and solely your religion».

The chuch has NO RIGHT to dictate what you do with your body.

Francisco You are in denial many Christians want to dictate what is taught in schools, they want to deny birth control to their employees, they want to control what a woman does with her body, they want to keep their tax free status, etc..

When they speak out against someone's right to do with their body as they wish, there is an issue.

In America we have freedom, rights and choices, one choice and right is to allow woman to have the choice to abort, adopt, or give birth if they want to, no one has the right to tell woman what they can or can't do with their bodies.

I believe that what a person does with their body is their business.

Angelou had a way of doing this with her body of work.

BoldGeorge, I am telling you it is none of your dam business what other people do with their bodies.

Since when is it any of my employers business what I do with my body?

If you don't want to have someone else decide for you that you should have your d*ck cut off, then don't presume to decide what others do with their bodies or the contents thereof.

The belief that they should control what other people do with their bodies?

They are not trying to regulate what you do with your body — they are saying that if you want them to pay for it then they will not support it or pay for it.

The issue isn't and has never been one of women's rights or the right to do with your body what you want.

The fact that you like to use that bible for the worse (ie; denying equal rights; telling women what they can / can't do with their bodies) makes you an immoral ass... a true blemish of humanity.

This comes right back to a bunch of men wanting to tell women what they can and can not do with their bodies.

Release a list of all the Archbishops, Bishops, and priests that molested their congregation, with a list of who was molested, as well as complete signed apologies from all the resulting offenders, and a signed confession by the Pope that these people will be charged in a criminal court for these crimes and will not ever be allowed to preach the word of God in a Catholic church, and then, MAYBE, I'll think you have a right to tell your followers they can't do with their bodies as they please.

For example, if a couple wash the dishes together in the kitchen this issomething that they do with their bodies, it is something that can «make» love between them, but it can only do so because the principle that is eliciting the love is spiritual not bodily.

It is not about what someone does with their body, but with who is inside.

It just means that I don't believe anyone should dictate what a woman does with her body.

How do we apply Jesus» truth what comes out of hearts is more important than what we do with our bodies?

I live a good life where I'm always willing to put others before me regardless of who they love; what they do with their body, what their belief is.

Maybe you have failed to comprehend this, what a person does with their body is not your business nor the business of your imaginary friend god.

You can't tell people how to live their lives, what to do with their body, and who they can marry, just because of what you read in a 2000 year old book that is unsupported by evidence.

Until then, and EVEN then, you don't have any business telling women what to do with their bodies or the contents thereof.

It is not your place to decide what a woman can do with her body.

I think the bottom line is that if liberals want to give women (and others) the right to choose what to do with «their body» and «in their bedrooms» I think it would only be consistent to allow the rest of us the right to choose what to do with our bodies, our wallets, and in our houses.

Now imagine that leprechaun believers were 89 % of the population and wanted to tell you how to live the leprechaun way and what to do with your body and what medicines to take and if you didn't worship the leprechauns correctly you might have pain in your shins for all eternity.

When I think about not breastfeeding — one of the most real things I've ever done with this body — ever again, I catch my breath with longing.

Let me do with my body what I want.

What I do with my body is my business.

They attend mass, confession and partake of communion, but when they pull the voting booth curtain closed they vote against MEN telling them what they can and can't do with their body.

There is more important stuff than what a woman does with her body, if the church would actually go out and try to do some good rather than try to regain control and FIXATE on this one issue, they would be a lot better off, imo.

If so cool... at least in Canada we don't infringe on the personal rights of a person to decide what to do with their bodies... even our Catholic School Boards cover contraception in their medical plans.

Prosecutor Korb observes, «People will want to look at it as a woman's right to do with her body as she pleases prior to the birth of the child.

Calling me stupid when you think you and your imaginary friend have any say over what a woman does with her body??? Are you seriously that delusional?

In his book Surprised by Hope, N.T. Wright notes, «The point of the resurrection... is that the present bodily life is not valueless just because it will die... What you do with your body in the present matters because God has a great future in store for it.

And your asinine analogy of a thief in a store is beyond absurd, and has no bearing on legislation of what a woman may do with her body, whether you approve or not.

Then again, Reality is very hung up about sex as well, and like a conservative, loves telling other people how to live their personal life and what they can't do with their bodies.

As I watched the story of bin Laden's death unfold Sunday night, I was preoccupied with the question, «What are they going to do with the body?»