Sentences with phrase «do with the people claiming»

So what does this have to do with the people claiming the Big Five are the only «traditional» publishers?

Not exact matches

«People don't walk around with anti-résumés telling you what they have not studied or experienced (it's the job of their competitors to do that), but it would be nice if they did,» Taleb claims.

The right thing to do when confronted with a mistake is to own up to it, not to make a series of bizarre claims in defense then insult the profession of the people who correctly pointed out the error.

The Post «s attempt to make contacts using data provided from Jiedaibao was largely fruitless, with the few people who did answer their phone calls claiming to not be the borrowers in question.

Someone who actively uses social media to dissuade people from doing business with your company, and probably doesn't care about your reply to his or her claims.

With that said, here is what the people claiming responsibility for the TalkTalk hack told us about how and why they did it.

Underneath the claim was a genuine problem with the message, that people truly wishing to assist the protesters could do so simply by checking in rather than sending funds or supplies to support their efforts.

This is a popular deduction because it's easy to claim since you don't have to itemize, and because a lot of people with student loan debt are eligible.

Of the people surveyed, 82.2 percent said they had heard about the allegations publicized by the Washington Post, including one woman who claims Moore had sexual contact with her when she was 14 and he was 32, but regardless, nearly three - fourths of Republicans don't want their candidate to drop out.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

Christians should be the first to denounce people like Phelps and the fool that «put the Koran on trial» and burned it in order to cause crap — they don't represent Jesus BUT their actions combined with words claiming to be followers of the Nazarene bring shame on those who do follow Jesus.

@Noah, That book is ridiculous... He claims the universe is likely younger than 13.7 b.y. and backs it up by claiming that 100 + measurements taken over the past 300 years supports the claim that light does not travel at a constant rate... As if people 300 years ago could measure with the kind of accuracy we can today

Science didn't challenge the existance of God, people who claim they are scientists just copy and agree with whatever was decided by the scientific comunity.

But the claim with which Keister begins her study» that a person's religious beliefs will exert some influence on whether he will pursue material wealth and how he will go about doing so» seems eminently reasonable.

Mohamed did unite his people with the words he claimed to have been given from an angle.

Perhaps, because like «atheist» it is a term claimed by a large group of people who also hold ideas I don't agree with.

We do not know whether persons in this group, while moved by the presence and claims of individuals with whom they are in face - to - face relations, may, on another level, be oblivious to and unmoved by more impersonal social structures and practices that consistently put and keep persons in situations of oppression and deprivation.

I don't have a problem with people who claim God spoke to them in private.

You have claimed that non-believers must disprove god, but you have recently modified that to «if a person says «God does not exist», they must back that up with evidence.»

The stark account of an event in the Gospels always begins with the claim of truth: this is the way things did happen, regardless of why or what people thought.

The fact that he converted to christianity just before he died and made unsupported claims, does not make the OP fallacious — the bible was written by primitive people with no knowledge of how the Solar system was created or how species evolved.

Why don't you open your mind and stop assaulting people in the name of Christianity... or if you prefer just claim all Scientists are Atheists trying to fool Christians with Carbon Dating.

Honestly, I think when people attack it, it has more to do with the claim it comes from god and how absurd that claims seems given the writing and its overall history.

What I do have a problem with, is people making outlandish claims (not really referring to you here John, please don't misunderstand) and trying to force their beliefs onto people who don't want any part of it.

The patriarchal, macho, controlling, manipulative, shaming, money - grubbing, name - it - and - claim - it, fear - mongering, other - despising, fiefdom - making, using and abusing, excuse for narcissistic and plain old selfish and power - addled appalling behavior that is commonly called «church» and «church leadership» has nothing whatsoever to do with anything the person or character or compilation or concept called «Jesus» ever reportedly or theoretically said, did, or conveyed.

Do these people who follow a set of «new rules» qualify the claim that America remains obsessed with work?

Religion is a corporate and political structure bent on destroying things that help the most vulnerable in society with no guarantee of filling the void.They claim they can do it better, but since you can not make people be charitable and so many megachurches are focused on the bottom line, I don't see how this is going to pain out.

These attacks are the act of people following Satan not God and those claiming responsibility for the attacks need to be recognized as agents of Satan — God did not cause these attacks — he judges each according to his merits — anyone that ridicules God or his prophets will be dealt with by him not humans — these attacks are the works of the followers of Satan.

And for the Christian faith, the claim to be made is that the moment of greatest intensity is the emergence in the sphere of history and of human life of the person of Jesus Christ, with all that he was and all that he continues to be, all that he did and all that he continues to do, all that he meant and all that he continues to mean for those who respond to him in heart's surrender.

I don't know if a creator would choose to interact with individuals or not but it is rather like arguing whether bigfoot would choose to have personal interactions with specific individuals, until there is verifiable proof of bigfoot, people who claim that they have a personal relationship with bigfoot sound silly.

Defending the argument is only necessary because the stupid an unsubstantiated claim that «atheists killed more than Christians» is repeatedly made, and usually done so with imaginary figures like «Mao killed 800 million people».

By claiming she has done these things with the help of a god and as a Christian alienates many people.

What you are claiming is that only through acceptance of YOUR god can people avoid he - ll, which means that being good has nothing to do with it.

«The trouble with this approach, of course, is that despite the veneer of civil religion, most people in America aren't worried about whether they break one of the Ten Commandments now and then, and they certainly don't see the logic behind the claim that infractions of that sort warrant everlasting damnation.

It may also have something to do with the fact that less intelligent people are drawn toward a belief system that claims to have all the answers while not being a referendum on the belief system itself.

the church has a lot of evil people in it claiming to be holy when all there doing is tryin to us the church to cover up and get away with molesting children.

There are also agnostics, who believe that we don't know if there is a «God»; and there are theists, who believe that there is a higher power, but don't believe religion's claims that he / she / it interacts with us or directs our paths in an afterlife; and there are people with no label to their beliefs, who believe that we are on our own here on Earth to make it as good a place as we can.

Just like certain radical, hate - filled, and violent people claim to be «Christian,» but have nothing to do with the teaching of Christ, so also, some racists claim to be Pagan but are not representative of the entire group.

That seems to imply that the person offering the trip is claiming to have the only path... and is intolerant of anyone who may hold a different opinion of what to do with their weekend.

There are great masses of people today who like Jesus and think He and His teachings are great, but who want nothing to do with those who claim to be His followers, by those who claim to be «Christians.»

I am a believer in God, and it embarrasses me to see people who claim to have faith do something like this, for Christians already have a bad rep. I have many friends with different beliefs and I don't go trying to shove mine down their throat - what matters is a person's character, and I know wonderful people who are atheists.

It is written in the book of Dawkins 2:28 - 34 «Then shall the bearers of false witness claiming supernatural phenomenon and worshipers of deitys fall upon the righteous with their knives and swords, tearing my people apart who did nothing but point out that their God's did not exist.

Real Christians Hate Religion... Real Christians Hate Hypocrites... Real Christians should be more like Christ... How could you claim to be a Christian if you don't even know your Christ... The reason why doomed people would never understand Christ is because they never tried to search for the Truth... They only listen to such rubbish things rather than the Truth... Read and do more and Talk less... It doesn't take a genius to know that Someone created you rather than you coming to life with just atoms randomly hitting each other... If you're really smart, think about it... Stop the non-sense talk about God and Science and find it out for yourself...

@neitdarwin — not sure is that an argument for or against, pretty sure Hitler had nothing to do with Christianity, but lip service to look like a «good moral character» plenty of people claim Christianity to look like a good person

So the point of this is, atheists, is that if you're claiming someone is a lune for having God intereacting with them, it's similar to saying they're a lune for receiving a phone call from someone they know, because phone calls are selective too, they can consume someone's senses, and there's no guarantee that the person calling, will contact everyone over the planet... just to prove themself to someone that isn't a friend... or someone that doesn't love God.

where's the «democracy» you are claiming that you have,, tell me exactly are a religious nations, racist nations,, do you really care of the ppl despite their religions or with their religions,, let's say you have the chance to kick them out,, would u kick the native British Muslims out as well,, do u have the rights??

An honest person who openly disagrees with you on a few things is a better choice than a dishonest person who claims they believe everything you do, and secretly disagrees with you... or even disdains you for your gullibility.

And since most people who claim there is a «god's law» disagree on what it is, I say we continue to go with man's law just like we do when we go with man's law and call it «god's law.»

The bigger issue with his «Christianities» stem from the church he claimed to have attended for long is an imposter (what many call a church of hate), his conversion coincides with the start of his political career, he's never given any account of why he converted to Christianity (people who do convert invariably have very specific reasons), and in one of his books he vows that he will stand with Islam.

We take issue with believers using their belief as an excuse to push their ideas onto people who don't share their god - belief and claim superiority over other «infidels.»