Sentences with phrase «do with the warm air»

The implication of this statement reads like GW has no disercnable influence on hurricanes, like GW has nothing to do with warmer air.

Not exact matches

In the same way that you can tell when someone walks the world with a «don't mess with me» air vs. a warm and open welcome, people in business convey similar signals.

If you don't have a yoghurt maker then you could use a wide - necked flask of some sort, or a jar, provided that you have somewhere consistently warm to place it for 24 hours (like an airing cupboard, or in the oven with just the light on).

We certainly didn't feel like braving the 10 degree New England air yesterday morning to hit up our favorite little place in town, Leo's, for breakfast but I'd say this was quite the perfect way to «make do» with a few pantry staples, settle down with a full warm plate in hand, watch the kitty sleep by the fire, and spend some time with the seed catalog dreaming of spring.

The warm air dryer is also adjustable for when you are done with the washing.

So when they swing up, these waves suck warm air from the tropics to Europe, Russia, or the US, and when they swing down, they do the same thing with cold air from the Arctic,» explains lead author Vladimir Petoukhov.

If we could do that [with a solar cell], then we could actually deal with global warming problems even more directly because we'd be pulling the CO2 out of the air to make our fuel.

By vacuuming carbon dioxide out of the air — something the world may need to do in earnest one day, in order to avoid the worst - case scenarios associated with global warming — the plant has effectively put a cost ceiling on what it would take to de-carbonize any industry in the world.

Velders says his team came up with higher warming estimates than IPCC because their model accounts for trends that others don't, such as the faster - than expected adoption of HFCs driven by the Montreal Protocol, and an air - conditioning boom in the developing world.

You could catch up with a friend, do yoga, get some fresh air and go for a walk, read a good book, take a warm bath, or do your favorite hobby.

Once I was done using it, I simply rinsed the sponge out with warm water, squeezed to remove the excess water & let it air dry.

Though I'm from Malaysia and it's always warm and humid throughout the year, it doesn't hurt to wear a nice, comfortable blazer in places with air condition or...

When you open the window and feel the air is DEFINITELY warm and the sun is shining, there is nothing to do but throw on a colorful floral romper and head to a brunch spot with outdoor seating.

leave cap off make sure fill with antifreeze and start car allow it to warm up and watch u should be able to see the water flow this will allow the air to come out per air pockets are a big cause... now buy a new radiator cap per this also small but cause a big prob... also while watching the water flow flow if bubbles stay present it could be head gasket this pushes combustion gas thru and can cause antifreeze to dicipate hence why u keep having to put more unless yur pump leaking or hose this the only other way u will get low on anti freeze... hope this helps it took me a while to figure out so i did nt have to spend lots of cash on a mech that wouldnt probably now this either top secrets lol... they wont tell u its all biz... hope this helps

The cooling seats couldn't really keep up with the 95 - degree sun, and the Airscarf system, made for keeping your neck warm, doesn't switch over to air conditioning no matter the exterior temps.

Standard equipment includes four - wheel antilock brakes; AM / FM stereo with cassette player; eight - way power driver's seat; air conditioning; power windows, locks and outside mirrors; power adjustable brake / gas pedals that move to you at the push of a button so you don't have to power the seat forward to reach the pedals; floor console with lots of storage capacity plus a power plug; and redundant climate / audio controls in the steering wheel, though the controls in the wheel don't show you how to get warm air to face and feet at the same time, either.

But his breath misted the air like hers did, and his chest, when it collided with her forehead, had been warm.

The hotel was good, but could have done with air conditioning as rooms were very warm.

Don't always shoot with the sun behind you: shooting into the light can give atmospheric results, especially if there is mist or water in the air, or if it's around sunrise or sunset when the light has a pleasing warm tinge.

Could do with some air conditioning for the warmer days.

Rooms are also equipped with adjustable heating and air conditioning but, if we have to quibble, we did have a problem getting our room comfortably warm.

Another option is climate engineering — lofting plane - loads of particles into the air the way a volcano does to artificially counteract some greenhouse warming with a sun - blocking veil.

So, if you have two identical glass greenhouses with thermally isolated mercury thermometers at equilibrium in the sunlight [One with Air at Press =P, and the 2nd w / CO2 at Press =P], and you close the blinds — you will see the thermometer in the CO2 greenhouse retain its temperature longer — not because of any «global warming» type effect, but simply because Air conducts heat to the walls of the greenhouse better than Air does.

None of it will have anything to do with global warming, which is simply a lot of hot air.

So, if you have two identical glass greenhouses with thermally isolated mercury thermometers at equilibrium in the sunlight [One with Air at Press =P, and the 2nd w / CO2 at Press =P], and you close the blinds — you will see the thermometer in the CO2 greenhouse retain its temperature longer — not because of any «global warming» type effect, but simply because Air conducts heat to the walls of the greenhouse better than CO2 does.

It does mean air is apt to be warmer and moister and with prospects for more snow on nearby land in the Fall.

The equation for the dry adiabatic lapse rate is very simple and has nothing to do with how warm the air is.

The idea of an evaporation thermostat was proposed in the 1970's by Newell, and was based on erroneous reasoning confusing correlation with causation; when one does the physics, one finds that evaporation increases the air - sea coupling, but can't prevent a warming if the atmosphere itself warms.

Recall that the air flowing across laterally and downward to the top of the descending column did not warm up adiabatically due to its contact with the stratosphere above.

More importantly, since the reflection doesn't happen at night, (AFAIK) the net result is greenhouse warming relative to clear air with a window for surface IR.

Whilst flowing across the area between the two columns that cold air does not warm up by compression despite falling in height because it remains in contact with stratospheric air with which it can freely exchange energy by conduction and mixing.

Using the empirical relationships between Greenland and the Northern Hemisphere surface air temperature data, we calculate that if Greenland was to become in phase with the hemispheric pattern, as it did after 1923, an additional 1.08 — 1.68 C warming would occur.

The warmer air evaporates more moisture, but it does so across the entire ocean, and this moist air mixes continually with the air above it, so * all * the air is moister.

By contrast, there is quite a lot of data now telling us that CO2 is not a climate driver: We did the experiment of adding a large slug of CO2 to the air and the temperature stopped rising in 1997, the stratosphere stopped cooling in 1995 and the oceans showed no warming down to 700m when we replaced guesswork with accurate measurement in 2003.

One problem with idea is doesn't require much energy to cool even warm air, and cooling cold air is even less significant.

Rider: If CO2 does help warm the air (or the globe in general), does the extra warmth disappear soon after, with no significant effect on climate?

R. Gates responds to Matthew R. Marler's question with the following gobbledegook: «If you put a jacket on (which is essentially what the atmosphere is in relation to the ocean) that jacket does not warm your body, but allows the heat from your body to move to the cold air outside the jacket less readily.»

The global warming signal itself is a multidecadal feature of the climate, but just like the seasonal example above, it has been possible at times to take one period of one temperature record - surface air temperatures in most cases - and do a «January - February» job with it, thereby making the claim that temperatures are flatlining or even cooling.

Problem # 1 — «All things being equal, a bottle filled with CO2 will always warm faster and to a higher temperature when heated than does a bottle filled with regular air because the specific heat of CO2 is lower than that of air.»

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

I don't care about the real DALR in the real atmosphere, which is an utterly dynamic quantity that is basically never precisely observed and which is derived, using a bunch of approximations and assumptions that include active transport of air parcels and «0» conductivity, to provide us with some insight into why the atmosphere does remain warmer at the bottom than at the top.

For a scientist, sixteen years with no warming ought to be enough to tell him that the experiment has failed, that the attempt to cause warming by putting carbon dioxide in the air just does not work.

Warm air rises because it is less dense — it is all to do with kinetic energy.

But when you look at the very cold regions where there is almost no water in the atmosphere to begin with, or the desert regions, you do not in fact see any observable evidence that the air is any warmer than it was in the past with respect to CO2 increases.

Spengler et al. (2011) did the following: they took a normal column of air with an observable quantity of the water vapor and then imagined, in a thought experiment, that all vapor between 2 and 4 km in the atmosphere suddenly condenses, the latent heat is released in the sensible form and warms the atmosphere.

If you want to claim that warmer air doesn't hold more water vapor before condensing, then you need to go back to the 1800s and duke it out with scientists from back then.

Another option is climate engineering lofting plane - loads of particles into the air the way a volcano does to artificially counteract some greenhouse warming with a sun - blocking veil.

If these plumes of warm air operated in the same way during the last glaciation as they do know then they would make short work of ice sheets that were hanging around because of the albedo effect, this is possible because not all the northern hemisphere mid latitude land surface was covered with ice throughout the period of glaciation and might explain why glaciations terminate quickly

You see it is unfortunate that even with all the hot air from catastrophic global warming alarmism, the «hot enough to fry an egg» metaphor doesn't actually work — even in one of the hotest places in the world (Death Valley)!

Lower the moisture content of the interior air with dilution ventilation or warm up the surfaces or do both.