Sentences with phrase «do with these warm temps»

Not exact matches

To do this room temp business quickly, place the 3 eggs in a bowl and cover with warm water.

By the time she is done with that, the bottle is completely warmed up perfectly to body temperature, the same temp it would be if it came directly from mom.

I do admit that for me, I would probably wear my wool coat with layers and a robust cashmere scarf, as walking warms me up and the weather will likely be sunny despite the temp.

With the warmer temps lately I am hoping to take Aria on her first outing to the mall to do some shopping.

I always score some of my most favorite winter pieces around this time and it gets me excited for next year's cold temps;) The Frye boots I wore throughout my trip are almost 40 % off (btw they're ridiculously warm / comfortable), I'm in love with these Ugg lace up boots that are under $ 120 (don't they look so much more expensive?)

With the warm temps in SoCal year round, you don't really notice seasons changing.

With chilly temps lingering along most of the East Coast if you're dreaming about an escape to somewhere warm I do not blame you!

The cooling seats couldn't really keep up with the 95 - degree sun, and the Airscarf system, made for keeping your neck warm, doesn't switch over to air conditioning no matter the exterior temps.

His position: • No evidence of increasing lake clarity as a result of secchi measurements since 1946 • The interplay of stratification and plankton productivity are not «straightforward» • Challenges O'Reilly's assumption on the correlation of wind and productivity - the highest production is on the end of the lake with the lowest winds • A strong caution using diatoms as the productivity proxy (it is one of two different lake modes) • No ability to link climate change to productivity changes • More productivity from river than allowed for in Nature Geopscience article • Externally derived nutrients control productivity for a quarter of the year • Strong indications of overfishing • No evidence of a climate and fishery production link • The current productivity of the lake is within the expected range • Doesn't challenge recent temp increase but cites temperature records do not show a temperature rise in the last century • Phytoplankton chlorophylla seems to have not materially changed from the 1970s to 1990s • Disputes O'Reilly's and Verbug's claims of increased warming and decreased productivity • Rejects Verburgs contention that changes in phytoplankton biomass (biovolume), in dissolved silica and in transparency support the idea of declining productivity.

I pointed out that the world could well have seen these temps / rates before (in fact go back millions of years and it probably did, along with quite a few extinctions), but we're arguing about the warming today.

Just to let you know how stupid the global warming activists are, I've been to the south pole 3 times and even there, where the water vapor is under 0.2 mm precipitable, it's still the H2O that is the main concern in our field and nobody even talks about CO2 because CO2 doesn't absorb or radiate in the portion of the spectrum corresponding with earth's surface temps of 220 to 320 K. Not at all.

4) the end results on the bottom of the first table (on maximum temperatures), clearly showed a drop in the speed of warming that started around 38 years ago, and continued to drop every other period I looked / /... 5) I did a linear fit, on those 4 results for the drop in the speed of global maximum temps, versus time, ended up with y = 0.0018 x -0.0314, with r2 = 0.96 At that stage I was sure to know that I had hooked a fish: I was at least 95 % sure (max) temperatures were falling 6) On same maxima data, a polynomial fit, of 2nd order, i.e. parabolic, gave me y = -0.000049 × 2 + 0.004267 x — 0.056745 r2 = 0.995 That is very high, showing a natural relationship, like the trajectory of somebody throwing a ball... 7) projection on the above parabolic fit backward, (10 years?)

I'd like to state at the outset that that I consider myself a luke warmer, have am convinced that the Hockey Stick has basically been proven to be an outright fraud, that Climategate shows much of current climate science to lack any credibility, and acknowledge that there does appear to have been a lot of tampering with surface temp record, always aimed at getting the same (warming) result.

Warm temps are favorable to the beetles but the current outbreak has a lot to do with modern fire suppression in the forests too.

Not to mention, why do skeptics continue to ignore, dismiss, or simply «argue with» by any means possible, the far more important fact that most of the increased absorbed heat energy is going into warming the oceans, not the atmosphere (thus keeping the ambient air temp rise from registering as high as it otherwise would, and impacting FUTURE climate far more).

And, of course, you're stating a strawman in the first place, climate models help with the understanding of various details of climatology, but the basic understanding that CO2 is a GHG, that warming temps increases the absolute humidity leading to a positive feedback, etc etc would stand even if the complex climate models you disparage didn't exist.

Atmospheric temps probably had little to do with ASI melt till the warming restarted in the 1970's.