Sentences with phrase «do with this thing called»

He gave each a will to decide what we are going to do with this thing called life.

Not exact matches

A Times story in July was so laden with quotes from disgruntled customers and staff that Price's worried friends called to say he always has a place to stay if things don't work out.

But when things do come up (perhaps because a key client is calling with a hairy monster of a problem), the manager is in the dark.

Assuming the letter you've received doesn't paint the whole picture for you, calling this number will be well worth it as talking to a person not only helps you understand the nuances of the situation but there's comfort in knowing that a human being with a name and a face at the IRS is there to help you figure things out.

EASTWOOD: And so one thing led to another so when I went off to Iceland to do Flags of Our Fathers, I had with me another script called Letters from Iwo Jima.

«The things you say on the call and write in the filing have to match up, and I thought they just didn't,» he later said in an interview with Reuters.

Once a month we have a conference call with a key group of franchisees to discuss things we're doing right and areas that need improvement.

Just because a great many so - called rules deserve a stake in the heart, doesn't mean you should take things too far and start playing totally fast and loose with language, however.

Advisers who work with Brandes are equipped with a so - called «IDEAS» script, with each letter identifying a different step in the process: Inquire about how the other person is doing; Describe things you hear; Empathize with the client; Add your own point of view; Suggest a solution.

Resonance Founder and CEO Rachel Parker helps companies, associations, and other organizations understand why traditional advertising just isn't connecting with today's customers... and how this new thing called «content marketing» (which actually isn't so new) is doing just that.

But when you get to call them stocks and you get stock quotes daily on these pieces of paper that bounce around put people put numbers on it and volatility and all these other things where really it's not that meaningful, you know from one sense if you're investing in businesses and you did a lot of research and invested in eight different businesses with the proceeds of your sale, people would think you're a pretty prudent guy.

Similar sentiments resonate across Facebook with many calling the act an inconsiderate and DB (acronym) thing to do.

That approach isn't surprising: As a trainee with IDS Financial Services (a predecessor to Ameriprise) in 1987, Garrett so hated cold calling that she got «sick to [her] stomach every Monday morning because [she] couldn't sell people things they didn't need,» she told this reporter for a 2002 profile in Research magazine.

Pantera Capital's Charles Noyes called it «opportunistic» with a white paper that is «essentially a wishlist of things they want to have, and how it will work assuming that their wishlist doesn't crash and burn.»

At a national sales meeting I did on Smart Calling prospecting for outside sales reps, Gary Farnam gave me a list of his takeaways from the session, along with some of the things he always does on his calls.

You speak of things with certainty, even calling a man a liar, a man you do not know.

However, when leaders try to enlist me in their own vision, sometimes I agree because it fits in with mine (and then look for ways to apply MY calling and gifts to further the cause), other times I just do my own thing because I don't identify with what they suggest.

I can understand a distrust with organized religion and being an atheists, but are you not doing the same thing as Christians by saying what you think is real or calling out those that you think are wrong.

I call myself an atheit just to get even with all the christians (in all their many varieties) for the times they told me I would go to H E double hockey sticks for not believing in their particular way of doing» the jehovah thing.

You called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».

This has nothing to do with Muslims... It is called economy... in free market I can sell my goods to anybody I like to or not... If you think not selling goods to another nation is being insensitive than I have news for you... so called EU christian countrys are guilty beyond your imagination for not selling certein things to Muslim countries..

Well, the nice thing is that I don't walk around thinking that I was born with something called «sin» (which is a concoction of religion) and spending my time trying to please an invisible friend.

But as long as I know how important maternal health is to Haiti's future, and as long as I know that women are being abused and raped, as long as I know that girls are being denied life itself through selective abortion, abandonment, and abuse, as long as brave little girls in Afghanistan are being attacked with acid for the crime of going to school, and until being a Christian is synonymous with doing something about these things, you can also call me a feminist.

Yet the so - called Christians that Ryan associated himself with for 19 years were really only concerned about people who viewed things the way they did... and had no love for him.

Thus it acknowledges with the apophatic tradition that we really do not know the inner being of divine reality; the hints and clues we have of the way things are, whether we call them religious experiences, revelation, or whatever, are too fragile, too little (and often too negative) for heavy metaphysical claims.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

One thing I tell my students with some frequency is that you don't get to pick your calling.

Our Churches, with common consent, do teach that the decree of the Council of Nicaea concerning the Unity of the Divine Essence and concerning the Three Persons, is true and to be believed without any doubting; that is to say, there is one Divine Essence which is called and which is God: eternal, without body, without parts, of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness, the Maker and Preserver of all things, visible and invisible; and yet there are three Persons, of the same essence and power, who also are coeternal, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

So if it turned out that a committee of zombies created the world, we can call them God and realize it doesn't have a thing in the world to do with the God in the Bible.

With these pastors, priest, popes, and elders all lying to the people, misleading the flocks, as was prophesied they would in Ezekiel 20, Malachi 2, Jeremiah 23:1 - 5, we are all a lost generation of pestilence, greed, and poverty, and this is not old people, as taught to us in Isaiah 43:11,13 - 19; that this book gives us the past, present, and future of what is going on, then, and now, it's juxtapose, meaning one must «compare» what is going on today with what went on long ago, for it has not changed any, not a bit from how people went astray then, full of pride, and are doing the same thing now, calling it good, or right, prophesied in Malachi 3:13 -With these pastors, priest, popes, and elders all lying to the people, misleading the flocks, as was prophesied they would in Ezekiel 20, Malachi 2, Jeremiah 23:1 - 5, we are all a lost generation of pestilence, greed, and poverty, and this is not old people, as taught to us in Isaiah 43:11,13 - 19; that this book gives us the past, present, and future of what is going on, then, and now, it's juxtapose, meaning one must «compare» what is going on today with what went on long ago, for it has not changed any, not a bit from how people went astray then, full of pride, and are doing the same thing now, calling it good, or right, prophesied in Malachi 3:13 -with what went on long ago, for it has not changed any, not a bit from how people went astray then, full of pride, and are doing the same thing now, calling it good, or right, prophesied in Malachi 3:13 - 15.

This dilemma, it seems to me, calls for reflection upon all those old fairy tales in which the bolder of three unrestricted wishes manages nevertheless to screw things up: reading those stories as children, with considerable incredulity, we thought that in the same situation we would surely do better.

If a lion kills a zebra we don't call it «murder,» and if a great white forcibly copulates with a female, we don't call it «rap.e» If everything is objective to people, moral code being up for grabs, it seems quite feasible to live in a world where these things labeled as crimes are all just as ok as in the animal world!

That is somewhat promising — it hopefully means that 58 % don't really care — and rightfully so, with that little thing called separation of church and state.

Richard Dawkins directly calls on atheists to do such acts, with the idea that it'll lead to more focus on things that can actually be controlled by us, and resulting in a better life for everyone.

If he wanted to call me an agnostic simply because I didn't believe the same things he did with the same certainty, let him.

In arguing with atheists online - probably not the smartest thing to do, I'll admit it, BUT - I do feel duty bound to fall on the sword with someone like Richard Dawkins - on ocassion, because they rend such a huge YouTube'ism under their so called scientific opinions.

Seems some big one's mind the joining of «Turkey» and that is why all this pressure applied to make Muslims life more difficult in Europe with so many regulations... Some are taking into consideration the balance of powers and religions... Why can't Europe say no to America if do not want the joining of «Turkey» to League... why buy time prolonging with excuses and conditions while from inside they fight any thing called Islamic from appearance to rituals...?!

That was the dilemma after praying and seeking the Lord he shows me a couple of things one is God calls the shots not satan satans demons bow to Gods authority and must get his permission so they beg Jesus to send the demons into the pigs.Jesus allows it so we can see satans purpose is always to destroy life.God is still the same yesterday today and forever he is the giver of life.We do know that the pigs were owned by the gentile nations and may well have been offered or about to be offered to there gods which would mean they would belong to satan.Like the example Jesus said about taxes should he pay them and he said give to caesar what is caesars.Or the other option was that it showed Gods mercy to the man that had been healed by delivering him of the demons and he was also protecting the people in the area from the influence of the demons.So God is still the same he is unchangeable and definitely not bipolar.I would say if anyone was bipolar in this situation it is David and he like us struggled with the same choice to walk according to the flesh or walk according to the spirit of God.brentnz

there's only one thing you should do with the time that you have, regardless if it's religious holiday, winter / spring break, or whatever you want to call it.

@Aishah and Steve Martin, I have no problem with others believing and doing as they will, but at least call things as they are.

American consti tution has nothing to do with hinduism pagan ism of Mithra ism, savior ism called Christianity, but every thing with truth absolute, undivided God, claim by follower of hindu pagan trinity have no hand to be part of fundamentals of America.

The basic ontological problem is why there is anything at all and, since what does exist is a plurality, how the things that do exist are unified into a world.88 Neville understands Whitehead's principle of «creativity» (together with «one» and «many,» conjointly called the «Category of the Ultimate» by Whitehead) to be an attempted answer to the ontological question.

They are attacking the grab bag of evils and absurdities associated with that amorphous reality called religion, which is an easy thing to do.

God didn't call me to succeed in making sure everyone agrees with my way of seeing things but instead to be faithful to Jesus.

I've been spit on, called names, threatened with eternal burning, threatened with your fists, and threatened that your god is going to do terrible things to me.

And if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; not that they were hereby warranted to drink poison, to show what power they had; but should they accidentally drink it, or rather should they be forced to it by their enemies in order to destroy them, they should find no hurt by it: and Papias F24 reports of Barsabas, surnamed Justus, who was put up with Matthias for the apostleship, (Acts 1:23), that he drank a poisonous draught, and by the grace of the Lord, received no hurt: and the Jews themselves report F25, that «a son of R. Joshua ben Levi, swallowed something hurtful; and one came and whispered to him in the name of Jesus, the son of Pandira (so they call our Lord), and he did well.»

So, though I believe that the primary note in Jesus, understanding of the kingdom was the rule of God with a moral and spiritual message of the judgment, yet the loving kindness of God and of God's call to faithful obedience in all things, I do not believe that this prophetic note makes it necessary to reject wholly the apocalyptic.

There is only one thing that will forever stand and that is Jesus Christ is real and you should read your Bible especially the book of John and Matthew chapter 25 everything in there is coming to pass and Jesus is getting ready to reveal himself to all the athesist buddhist etc the whole world.He is the King of King and lord of lords, if you think i'm crazy ask him to reveal himself to you if you are serious.Christianty is not a thing it is again a personal relationship with Christ thru his Holly Spirit that if you are 100 % ready to call on and accept, its like your job you go to everyday you open the door and walk thru it, if you didn't you wouldn't know that it was there.

The pope also called out Christians who try to earn their salvation through works and associating with groups that don't actually do the things they say they are going to do.

But as I said, to no surprise, this being gay is now a reality, from over many generations of wrong doings of sins, and should be expected, it's all good» along with other pleasurable things as greed, selfishness, etc. that we do today, and calling it good, but it is wrong as said, or prophesied it would be in Malachi 3 vs. 14,, 15.