Sentences with phrase «doctors and patients do»

For example, biased outcomes are more likely when doctors and patients don't have an established relationship, the medical guidelines are ambiguous or decisions must be made under more extreme time pressures.

Not exact matches

Doctors don't come cheap, and the company will have to employ many of them to remain as patient - friendly as it intends: The goal, Cape says, is to never have wait times of more than 30 seconds.

I'm confident that when you and I speak again in the next 12 to 18 months that this discussion about why do I have to keep filling out the same patient form every time I go to the doctor's office on a clipboard will be gone.

The Internet has made a significant impact on healthcare by giving patients access to their medical records and letting doctors and hospitals use that information to do a better job.

The CDC did not take the recommendations of protocols in preparedness and equipment from Doctors Without Borders (who have been caring for Ebola patients in Africa).

Researchers Debra Roter and Judith Hall have suggested that differences in patient communication and attentiveness may play a role: In one analysis, in fact, female physicians spent two minutes (10 %) longer with patients than male doctors did.

Instead of giving a cancer patient a cocktail of 15 drugs as is done now, doctors could print 15 tumours from a biopsy and determine which one is most effective before issuing a prescription to the patient.

Even doctors use checklists with items like «wash your hands» and «double - check that you're not leaving surgical tools inside the patient» to make sure they don't forget anything.

«Doctors, they're seeing patients and they don't have time or motivation to get up to speed on this, but they're going to have to because it's going to impact them.»

FBI agents arrested former Insys Therapeutics (insy) CEO Michael Babich and five other former company executives on Thursday for allegedly bribing doctors to prescribe an extremely addictive opioid painkiller to patients who didn't need it.

The price of insulin has skyrocketed in recent years, with the three manufacturers — Sanofi, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly — raising the list prices of their products in near lock step, prompting outcry from patient groups and doctors who have pointed out that the rising prices appear to have little to do with increased production costs.

Doctors often use a combination of off - label drugs to try to manage patients» nightmares, flashbacks and depression, but the drugs do nothing to treat the underlying condition, and can have negative side effects.

The suit contended that the companies did so by inflating the published average wholesale price of the drug, giving free samples to doctors knowing they would charge patients and insurers for them, and giving incentives to doctors so that they would prescribe Lupron instead of less costly alternatives.

Said Perez on Friday: «Lawyers and doctors have an obligation to look out for the best interest of their patients and clients, and all's we're saying is, in the financial context, that advisor ought to do the same — and they can do it.

Project EmpowerMD, a research collaboration with UPMC, aims to create an AI - powered system that can capture and integrate medical expertise at scale by listening and observing doctors doing their work as they meet their patients.

«If they can do that, then [the Department of Health and Human Services] could declare that the doctor - patient relationship is one of a fiduciary duty, right?»

The defensive investor, which we wrote in our last post is a patient investor and an investor who doesn't have the time, interest, or capital (think doctor, widow, or early 20s investors) to really analyze the stock market and pick out names which may outperform the overall market.

The idea — and it is all the rage — is that our ubiquitous medical studies will be able to show the cost controllers which procedures work best, and which least, which prophylactic medications work, and which don't, etc. — so that money isn't wasted by doctors and patients pursuing the wrong paths.

Patients threatened malpractice suits against doctors who did not prescribe pain medications liberally, and gave them bad marks on the «patient satisfaction» surveys that, in some insurance programs, determine doctor compensation.

But candor leads to increased resistance: We don't want faceless bureaucrats telling patients and doctors who and who not to treat.

his decision to convert had nothing to do with what he found, but what he experienced as a doctor of dying patients and his investigation of different beliefs.

I understand that a false diagnosis and an inaccurate prescription may do more harm to the patient, but a doctor who does not love the patient or care about the patient and genuinely desire that they get well, will likely not accurately diagnose the sickness or prescribe a medicine.

The doctor analyses the psychic phenomena which the patient brings before him according to the theory of his school, and he does so in general with the co-operation of the patient, whom the tranquilizing and to some extent orienting and integrating procedure tends to please.

After all the futile treatments and the succession of helpless doctors, when grief has come even before the death, you sit there with a little cracked ice for the patient's parched mouth and throat, and think... At last I can do this one little thing right.

No HL does not have there right to know what goes on between a doctor and patient... ever.

The essay «God as Monica's Breast» is worth the price of the volume, and the «Consenting to Die» essay, which discusses suicide and death as something to do» rather than just wait for, breaks into a fictional discussion between a doctor and a cancer patient.

I never prayed that God take over and do something that was beyond the power of the patient and the doctors to do for themselves.

The fact that doctors are free to prescribe lethally for people with illnesses outside their areas of medical specialization — and to do so secure in the knowledge that they are legally less accountable than if they were treating the same patient — demonstrates the folly of legalizing doctor - prescribed death.

One day, doctors may be authorized to kill patients with active euthanasia, as they do already in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg.

It does have a high potassium content so patients with kidney disease and on certain medications should check with their doctors before using.

I'm now an L&D nurse, and while the hospital I work at doesn't allow VBACs, many of the doctors there try to accommodate patient wishes.

Doctor's don't give a scheisse about patients and certainly not women.

Doctors and midwives often do not currently tell patients that there are predicatable avoidable risks of future child disability with homebirth.

Also I know medical doctors who prescribe the Amber necklaces to patients and they do not usually sell them themselves so it's not for profit.

At least 22 parents and children suspect that renowned Dutch fertility doctor Jan Karbaat was secretly and illegally using his own sperm to impregnate his patients, just like an Indiana doctor who did the same thing and was unmasked by DNA evidence.

Because it can't be diagnosed by X-ray, doctors diagnose it by asking questions and getting patients to do simple physical activities — my son had to touch his nose and then touch the doctor's hand over and over.

Because of ALL the doctor's appointments, having a surgery herself, another few days of in - patient testing, and other medical issues in the family, I didn't «officially» start EC until about 4 months old... but by 6 months the nursing staff at our local ER knew I was «that lady who's really tiny baby pees on the potty.»

As for his patients who would choose a hospital delivery, they were well - known for making things «difficult» for hospital staff: refusing to be «shaved», have enemas, (both still standard procedures in 1981) and wanting to do unthinkable things like get up and walk around during labor instead of lying (preferably) on their backs or sides strapped to a fetal monitor - all with the encouragement and blessing of their doctor.

Doctor: Gives a long explanation of why this is not necessarily true, starting with the point that the MWs are not affiliated with the hospital and so when you do transfer, they have to treat you like a patient off the street.

It sucks that they don't work for everyone and I guarantee you that every nurse and doctor who was working with your friend had a lot of sympathy for her because it is absolutely no fun to see your patient in pain and to not be able to give her what she wanted.

Doctors and nurses do often mistreat patients without any real consequences.

Yes, I agree with you entirely, although if the patient has delusional beliefs about childbirth and didn't believe or understand the information her doctors provided she would not have capacity to refuse consent.

Would it have sucked possibly, absolutely, but there is a problem when things are being done against patients wishes even if it's their best interest... this is where consent, and educating the patient is important, instead of the attitude that so many doctors have of «don't question me, I'm the doctor and I know what's best.»

Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor - patient relationship.

Sometimes there are good reasons, but sometimes the reasons are related to insurance rates, or demands on doctors» time (some hospitals require an OB attending a VBAC to be in house the entire time the VBAC is laboring, and few doctors want to do this) rather than the most medically appropriate choice or patient safety.

It doesn't make sense that the doctor will see a patient who is seeking the care of a CPM (who can only attend homebirths) and tell the patient he couldn't care for her if she was planning a home birth.

I was one of those patients who just let the nurses and doctors do whatever they felt necessary.

While some doctors may pressure their patients to do it, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists now agree that natural tears may be better for the health of the mother than an episiotomy.

In the country's 250 birth centers, midwives tend to take far more time with patients than busy doctors do and the emphasis is on the whole woman — everything from consultations on what a woman should be eating during pregnancy to conversations about anxiety over delivery.

But autonomy doesn't mean doctors should do whatever the patient wants; it means doctors should allow patients to make treatment decisions after considering the risks, benefits, and doctor's recommendations.