Rather, as the Supreme Court has explained in a series of decisions over the past decade, the rule in patent cases should be the same as in any other sort of litigation — in this case, the
equitable doctrine of laches may not be used by accused infringers as a defense because there is a statute of limitations present to limit claims.
Carole J. Brown, J. held that the equitable claims were barred by
the doctrine of laches.
The pivotal case on
the doctrine of laches is an 1874 British case, Lindsay Petroleum Co. in which the Court stated:
The «otherwise» is principally a reference to
the doctrine of laches which is concerned with delay.
Manus Egan looks at the equitable
doctrine of laches, in the context of a pier entertainment dispute
This is largely congruent with *
the doctrine of laches.