Sentences with phrase «doctrine of resulting»

If the spouse with no title in the property has contributed, directly or indirectly, in money or money's worth, to acquire or improve the property, the doctrine of resulting trusts is engaged.

Instead, the court reaffirmed the doctrine of resulting trust, finding that where a party provides funds for another party's purchase of real estate, there is a presumption that the purchaser holds the property in trust for the funder (to the extent of his / her contribution).

Because if purchase funds come from somebody other than the prospective owner, the doctrine of resulting trust presumes that, regardless of who is... Read More»

Because if purchase funds come from somebody other than the prospective owner, the doctrine of resulting trust presumes that, regardless of who is on title, the owner holds the property in trust for whoever advanced the funds.

A recent decision of Ontario's Court of Appeal, Mroz v. Mroz, considered the doctrine of resulting trust.

Not exact matches

This however extreme it might sound, is largely what I have tried to do with the result that, now, very late in life, I have come full circle and after years of cynicism and doubt have become a Christian — but even now — not one who unthinkingly accepts every facet of my Doctrine of choice.

Quick note... Original sin, also called ancestral sin, [1] is, according to a Christian theological doctrine, humanity's state of sin resulting from the fall of man, [2] stemming from Adam's rebellion in Eden.

The founders of the Protestant revolt denied the distinction and the result has been a profusion of conflicting sects and doctrines ever since.

I should say it is the earliest of which we have any trace, and further that it is hard to see how any simpler or more primitive conception could have resulted in a new departure in religious doctrine, with the total result that not only the New Testament but all early Christian theology makes evident.

This kind of doctrine has the potential to stifle and suffocate women, even resulting in abuse at times.

Have you noticed that those who use the term almost always follow its use by their «interpretation» of what Scripture (usually certain specific passages, which result in certain specific doctrines) says?

Unlike the Lutheran - Catholic Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification issued earlier this year, this statement is not the result of an officially sponsored dialogue, but the collaborative work of individuals who speak from and to, but not for, our several communities.

The result was an attempt to «demythologise» religion, to prune away all references to the supernatural: events like miracles and the resurrection of the dead, and doctrines like the Holy Trinity and the divinity of Christ.

There is no escaping the extreme difficulty that confronts any attempt to frame a doctrine of the Atonement as a result of the growing recognition of the extent to which motives of theological and apologetic construction determine the Gospels as we have them.

It has resulted in a doctrine of God which in the era of the secular city forces men like Camus to choose between God and human freedom, between Christian faith and human creativity.

The result of this opposing of pure being to becoming was the doctrine of the divine impassibility, which has had throughout the centuries the approval of orthodox theology, both Catholic and Protestant.

This untoward result - interpreting a Constitution intended to guarantee religious liberty as requiring affirmative discrimination against people of faith - would seem to be the necessary result of a doctrine of separation that invalidates government action that lacks a «secular purpose» or has the effect of «advanc [ing]... religion» (Lemon v. Kurtzman [1970]-RRB-.

Whitefield's humility and patience did increase as he aged, but these improvements were increases in virtue, not results of compromise in his doctrine.

While not wishing to cast apsersions on those who choose to discuss theology and church doctrine and convince folks of their utter sinfulness, even though we have often observed that those methods rarely produce the desired results, we choose to follow in the steps of our Rabbi Jesus, as much as lies within in.

Thank you for sharing your view on «predestination» — I googled this due to my troubled spirit resulting from having a precious sister in Christ — extremely brilliant student of Biblical theology, etc. — verbally wipe me out with shaking finger in face, followed by multiple disturbing emails just short of accusing me of apostacy due to my view on this doctrine — my view is the same as yours.

One result is the lavish style of conspicuous consumption that dominates such institutions as Oral Roberts University and the Christian Broadcasting Network, where it has become normative doctrine that the pious will prosper.

The result of the print culture church adopting the expectation that all Christians would agree to exactly the same doctrine resulted in the shattering of Christian fellowship and some bloodshed.

The reproductive doctrines of this church promote overpopulation and, and as a result, famine and disease, in some of the most desperate areas of the world.

The application of this doctrine to the formation of higher levels of order out of lower levels results in an aggregate view of the higher order.

We are not concerned here to consider the eventual result of this Pauline and early Christian interpretation of Jesus — the development of the doctrine of the triunity of God, with distinctions made between the eternal Father, the Word (or Son) as the «outgoing» of God in creation and redemption, and the Holy Spirit somewhat uncertainly added to round out the three-fold pattern in unity.

At several crucial points in our preaching and teaching we have gone astray, and our inability to preach now an effective and vital doctrine of sin and salvation is fundamentally the result of our own mistakes.

For the paradox results from the doctrine of the atonement.

While all religions are intended to recognize, honor and worship God, they still are the result of man's thinking, man's development of doctrine and man's critical judgement — the «word of God» is by man's interpretation and that is proven beyond doubt just by all of the different (quality) interpretations.

The result is a process doctrine of God's two-fold nature.

Many minds of possibly many generations help to weave a myth, and a doctrine results from the reflection and deliberation of an often long line of religious thinkers.

As a result of this feedback, church doctrine is revised.

From my perspective, that is the result of sitting in any church where the minister preaches the notion of «all have sinned», «all have gone astray», «all who do not (insert doctrine here) will spend eternity in hell»

In over a thousand occasional writings he applied his doctrine of grace to concrete issues, and here it can be seen that his theology did not result in moral paralysis.

This is the scarcely questioned and surprising result today of an enquiry which for almost two hundred years has devoted prodigious and by no means fruitless effort to regain and expound the life of the historical Jesus, freed from all embellishment by dogma and doctrine.»

This is not the place to examine whether and under what conditions someone may certainly and invincibly think that he holds and must hold some secular proposition of a rigorously certain kind, (some truly «incontrovertible result of science»), whose compatibility with a doctrine of the faith he not merely can not actually in fact perceive, but one whose incompatibility with the doctrines of faith he thinks he perceives with quite inescapable certainty.

By confronting the spontaneous religious constructions with the results of natural science, philosophy can also eliminate doctrines that are now known to be scientifically absurd or incongruous.

This may involve a more thorough study of the Book of Revelation, as many great misunderstandings have resulted from it's teachings and many extreme doctrines of eternal damnation have been produced from it.

If the long story of the Trinitarian debate in Christendom is to be re-enacted in our present time its outcome may result in somewhat different formulations from those of the past, but scarcely in a substantive change of the affirmation that God is One and that however the doctrine of the Personae is stated it must still be affirmed that the Father is not the Son and the Son is not the Father and the Spirit can not be equated with either.

The new situation, which arose for the church as a result of the emergence of totalitarian doctrines in Europe, reinforced the conviction that the challenge must be answered by a total response of the whole church and that the ecumenical task must be conceived as a single whole.

From Boff's presentation it becomes clear that the specific image of the Trinity is being moulded by the needs of society which, in turn, is being viewed from a socially understood Trinity.12 The former becomes clear from his starting point which lies with the needs in church, society and cosmos, and with the opposition to a hierarchical church, an undemocratic society and a disregarded natural environment.13 The latter results from his dogmatic and historical treatment of the doctrine of the Trinity, especially from his developing the notion of perichoresis.

As a result of the above, the necessity of the doctrine of the free grace of God becomes apparent (not only from the above logic, but from Scripture itself).

Only from the coming together of both aspects can result, in my terms, a doctrine of the Trinity oriented towards both contextuality and catholicity.

In order to get a clearer perspective on the development of the doctrine of love we must examine the main themes of love in the Old Testament, including the covenant with the Hebrews as God's act of love, the human love required in faithfulness to the covenant, and the suffering of God as a result of human sin in failing to keep the covenant.

This is fundamental doctrine to the Christian faith, and your complete misunderstanding of it has resulted in the blessing of three extra minutes of time for me this morning, not having to read the rest of your article.

With Leibniz I suspect that the main advantages of the doctrine are philosophical, in enabling us to arrive at a view of life and nature in which the results of science are given their significance along with the values with which art, ethics, and religion are concerned.

It is as a metaphysical argument that I will show that my reading of creativity and affirmation of God as the source of that creativity will result in an improvement in the coherence and consistency of Whitehead's system, including his doctrine of God.

What I shall do here is to consider the consequences of applying to the doctrine of God the results of the analysis of the categorical conditions of human love.

I does not seem that the doctrine resulted from a careful analysis of what Scripture says, but rather that the doctrine was a result of a need within the early church to have a trump card against those who disagreed with it theologically.

«10 But the question of consciousness can of course not be dismissed when the philosophical stance is that of oneself as a human knower; and if cognitive consciousness is always the result of processing an input, as it appears to be with Kant's doctrine of synthesis, consciousness of the input can not be a cognition of reality.

Our secular self - help culture teaches us that our personal success reigns supreme over all, so fully subscribing to the secular doctrine of self - help and prosperity will result in us neglecting our spiritual nature in Christ.