Volf argues that Muslims have routinely misunderstood
the doctrine of the Trinity as a form of polytheism, but the fact remains that traditional Muslims do not accept Jesus as the Son of God.
In recent years, however, certain West German theologians, notably Jürgen Moltmann, Heribert Mühlen, and Eberhard Jüngel, have «rediscovered»
the doctrine of the Trinity as the basis for contemporary Christian belief and practice.
Tissa Balsuriya from Sri Lanka mounted an attack on
the doctrine of the Trinity as an example of Western imperialistic theology.
Mystery does not belong to
the doctrine of the Trinity as a doctrine.
Not exact matches
They noted the «increasing departure from the basis
of the WCC» — which they defined
as primarily to restore unity to the Church — and cited «a growing departure from biblically based Christian understandings»
of the
Trinity, salvation, the gospel, the
doctrine of human beings
as created in the image
of God, and the nature
of the church.
Reactions to this revelation have varied — from serious and constructive engagement to bewilderment that anyone would regard a complicated
doctrine like the
Trinity as being
of any importance.
But you left out some pretty crucial details, such
as the fact that Mormons do not accept the pivotal
doctrine of the
Trinity.
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious
doctrines and practices such
as the
trinity, immortality
of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment
of a clergy class, the teaching
of «personal salvation»
as more important than the sanctification
of God's name
of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.
Several
of the book's features are shared with other British theology: a basic concern for intelligent orthodoxy informed by worship; the
Trinity as the encompassing
doctrine, strongly connected to both church and society; a well - articulated response to modernity; a wide range
of «mediations,» through various discourses and aspects
of contemporary life (philosophy, history, friendship, sex, politics, aesthetics, the visual arts and music); a special affinity for the patristic period; and a preference for the essay genre.
When the Catholic church is examined carefully from its inception down through the centuries till now, it can be likened to a beast that has sought to control everyone through fear and intimidation,
as during the Crusades and Inquisitions, slaughtering those who disagreed with its «policies» and beliefs, such
as the unscriptural
doctrine of the
trinity.
Although Powell quite accurately notes that «Protestants were distinctively cool to this method
of expounding the
doctrine of the
Trinity,» such philosophers
as G. W. Leibniz (1646 - 1716)(with his description
of the
Trinity as force, intellect, and will) and Gotthold Lessing (1729 - 1781)(who defined the
Trinity as an eternal act
of self - knowledge) did go this route.
It is true that on various occasions he mentions other
doctrines as essential, including more objective ones such
as the deity
of Christ and the
Trinity.
The technical term is the
doctrine of the Atonement, although this has never been officially defined in the same way
as the
doctrines of the
Trinity and the Incarnation.
However we take the
doctrine of the
Trinity,
as ontological affirmation or
as symbolic expression, it is essential to the way in which the New Testament sees the relation
of God's love to his redemptive action in Jesus Christ.
Am not anti-Christ nor Anti-Jewish just like all Muslims am a monotheist so must be rather Anti-Polytheists & Disbelievers... but believe me it is not hatred but rather pityness for the innocents and hardness towards the wicked transgressors... Guess that is all about it unless few
of our brother got the message wrong!?! Since we learned from the Quran verses that there will be in paradise from the Jews, Christian and others from other beliefs... and since God forgives any thing else other than to assign for him partners
as polytheists do, then that means many of Christians and Jews are monotheist towards God although might show otherwise of fears from dominant doctrine... As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...
as polytheists do, then that means many
of Christians and Jews are monotheist towards God although might show otherwise
of fears from dominant
doctrine...
As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...
As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that
Trinity to correct it to show
as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...
as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided
as Three as now and for eternity...
as Three
as now and for eternity...
as now and for eternity...!?
On the one hand, process philosophers have made important advances under the inspiration
of the writings
of Alfred North Whitehead, while on the other a group
of thinkers has pursued the developmental implications
of the classical Christian
doctrine of God
as Trinity.1 Normally these two discussions proceed with little cognizance
of or interaction with one another.
Darrell L. Guder (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1980); Jürgen Moltmann, The Crucified God: The Cross
of Christ
as the Foundation and Criticism
of Christian Theology (New York: Harper and Row, 1974), The
Trinity and the Kingdom: The
Doctrine of God (New York: Harper and Row, 1981), and God in Creation: A New Theology
of Creation and the Spirit
of God (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1985); Robert Jenson, The Triune Identity (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982).
Most Christians believe in the
doctrine of the
Trinity, a description
of God
as Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
1See Eberhard Jüngel, The
Doctrine of the
Trinity: God's Being is in Becoming (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1976) / and God
as the Mystery
of the World, trans.
As I shall make clear later, there still remains some ambiguity as to the strict consistency of their process approach, but their efforts thus far nevertheless establish that a process interpretation of the doctrine of the Trinity is quite feasibl
As I shall make clear later, there still remains some ambiguity
as to the strict consistency of their process approach, but their efforts thus far nevertheless establish that a process interpretation of the doctrine of the Trinity is quite feasibl
as to the strict consistency
of their process approach, but their efforts thus far nevertheless establish that a process interpretation
of the
doctrine of the
Trinity is quite feasible.
Applying this to the
doctrine of the
Trinity, Jüngel suggests that the Father, Son, and Spirit enhance their previously existing relationship to one another through the decision to give
of themselves to their rational creatures: the Father through the gift
of his Son to us, the Son through freely allowing himself to be given
as such a gift, the Spirit in virtue
of his activity
as mediator, not just between the Father and the Son, but now likewise between the Father and his adopted sons and daughters (GGW 446 - 53, 505 - 14).
It could contain
doctrines that were not inherently understandable (such
as the
doctrine of the
trinity), or that seemed to be self - contradictory (such
as the full humanity and deity
of Jesus), or that were contradicted by other
doctrines (
as, for example, human freedom by divine predestination, or God's omnipotent goodness by human sin).
The author shows how the
doctrine of the
Trinity, understood
as revealing community within Godself, is consistent with women's experience.
Islam: To reject the Islam
as a heretical
doctrine, it is not necessary to read the Koran, because it is publically known that the Islam rejects the
Trinity and the devine sonship
of Jesus Christ.
It upholds core
doctrines such
as the Incarnation, God
as Trinity, Christ's physical resurrection, and the necessity
of Christ for salvation.
Where there is a real attempt to listen to the other, even the
doctrine of the
Trinity may not be so divisive
as it appears.
Whilst the very title
of «Protestantism» depicts its genesis
as a reactive movement, it is the case that strong protests against the Christian
doctrines of the
Trinity and the Incarnation form part
of the Koran and so
of Islamic faith.
Now I do know that you know much about church history but I would like to remind you that the Church formulated many
of its
doctrines, such
as the
Trinity, Jesus» divinity, etc., by way
of combating heresy.
In fact, only if we allow for the introduction
of other non-Biblical conceptualizations can we accept the orthodox
doctrines of the
Trinity and the Incarnation
as legitimate Christian options.
For the great majority
of Christians they were answered satisfactorily at Nicaea and Chalcedon in the adoption
of the
doctrine of the
Trinity with its assertion
of Christ's co-eternity and co-substantiality with the Father and with the
doctrine of his nature
as being the perfect and indissoluble union
of two quite distinct but complete and authentic natures; but a significant minority in the church, then and ever since, has found these answers either unintelligible or incredible.
By emphasizing a
doctrine of Christ without the whole perspective
of the
Trinity, theology developed in a very one - sided way and has come to be pre-occupied with the church
as the body
of Christ, with its structure, hierarchy, and its rules and regulations.
God
as Trinity had happened in the experience
of the early church before it was formulated into a
doctrine.
In the
doctrine of the
Trinity, he finds an excellent imagery for this: The triune communion which is communion - in - diversity creates the human being
as a communitarian being, and nature
as communitarian, letting them go into freedom and receiving them back in the eschaton.
We can say that it is not true,
as suggested Erik Peterson, that the
doctrine of the
Trinity has made impossible any political theology.15 But it continues to resist direct deductions
of political and economical systems from the
Trinity even in its Boffian notion.
Cosmotheandric «
trinity» offers, as a concept, both dynamics and coherence: the Cosmotheandric Reality is a differentiated reality which is in movement and holds together the three dimensions of God, Man and World.57 This «trinity» is perichoresis and relation, it is not monism or dualism but difference - in - relation: this aspect is shared by Panikkar and nearly all contemporary elaborations of the doctrine of the T
trinity» offers,
as a concept, both dynamics and coherence: the Cosmotheandric Reality is a differentiated reality which is in movement and holds together the three dimensions
of God, Man and World.57 This «
trinity» is perichoresis and relation, it is not monism or dualism but difference - in - relation: this aspect is shared by Panikkar and nearly all contemporary elaborations of the doctrine of the T
trinity» is perichoresis and relation, it is not monism or dualism but difference - in - relation: this aspect is shared by Panikkar and nearly all contemporary elaborations
of the
doctrine of the
TrinityTrinity.
The book certainly showed that Wills regards himself
as an orthodox Christian, for he stoutly insisted there that he holds to the
doctrines of the
Trinity and Incarnation
as understood by the first six ecumenical councils
of the Church.
My own trinitarian conception
of the God - world relationship,
as expressed in previous publications, lends itself even more dramatically to a field - oriented understanding
of the God - world relationship since it makes clear how the three divine persons
of the Christian
doctrine of the
Trinity can be said to possess a field proper to their own divine being which likewise serves
as the «matrix» or ontological ground for the field
of activity proper to creation (see, for example, The Divine Matrix 52 - 69 and «Panentheism from a Process Perspective»).
How we are to make place theologically for the reality
of Judaism, where the Law is the center
of religious life, in light
of the Church's confession
of Christ
as Lord and the
doctrine of the Holy
Trinity is not at all evident to me.
The
doctrine of the
trinity raises the problem
of individuality
as well
as other ontological issues.
Jürgen Moltmann has pointed out that one amazing ramification
of Christianity's peculiar
doctrine of the
Trinity is the way it transcends the patriarchalism implicit in Jewish monotheism
as well
as the matriarchalism implicit in pagan pantheism.49 Using sexual terms in a metasexual rather than a literal, genital, and bodily sense, the feminine dimension
of personality refers to the receptive, passive, self - effacing, care - receiving capacity in us all that contrasts with the initiating, aggressive, self - assertive, self - sufficient traits we associate with the masculine dimension.
Oh, they accepted the NT canon, and also the
doctrine of the
Trinity,
as well
as some other things, but they always say if it's not in the Bible, then it's not true.
JW's do not accept Jesus
as the Son
of God, second person
of the
Trinity, essential
doctrine to Christianity.
The
doctrine of the
Trinity keeps us from settling for a God who is too small or,
as in much contemporary spirituality so big or vague that God becomes what a friend once dubbed «the Sacred Blur.»
Fourteen out
of fifteen was a substantial achievement for the Landgrave, especially
as it included a long list
of central
doctrines: the Creator, the
Trinity, the Son
of God, Jesus, Original Sin, Redemption, Faith, Holy Spirit, Baptism, good works, confession, the State, optional traditions — a formidable list.
At the time
of the Reformation, the
doctrine of the
Trinity once again emerged
as a major point
of dispute, especially between the mainline reformers and certain evangelical rationalists among the radicals.