The eternity of the Son was a major concern in the development of the orthodox
doctrine of the Trinity in the early church.
There is no explicit
doctrine of the Trinity in the gospels, but these sayings about the Counselor became important material for the formation of that doctrine when, because of certain external pressures in the fourth century, the relation between God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit needed to be made explicit.
Not exact matches
They noted the «increasing departure from the basis
of the WCC» — which they defined as primarily to restore unity to the Church — and cited «a growing departure from biblically based Christian understandings»
of the
Trinity, salvation, the gospel, the
doctrine of human beings as created
in the image
of God, and the nature
of the church.
A lot
of churches believe
in order to be considered a true Christian, you have to also accept the
doctrine of the
Trinity.
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious
doctrines and practices such as the
trinity, immortality
of the soul, that God torments people
in a «hellfire», the establishment
of a clergy class, the teaching
of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification
of God's name
of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting
in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.
And until Calvinism does away with it's inherent Nestorianism (which reemerged recently when a group
of Calvinists attempted to redefine the
Trinity in order to make it compatible with their new
doctrine of «complementarianism», you look pretty hypocritical saying that Catholic theology is «at least
in parts heretical».
The
trinity was a theological development from a series
of councils
in the first 400 years or so
of Church development
of doctrine.
At Harvard Divinity School, with the encouragement
of his mentor Paul Tillich, he immersed himself
in the classic texts
of Christian theology, with special attention to Christology and the
doctrine of the
Trinity.
The book's title, The Birth
of the
Trinity,
in fact understates the support it gives to the claim that the
doctrine of the
Trinity was not developed by the Church on slender foundations, but is found with significant richness
in the New Testament.
«That's why the
doctrine of the
Trinity became so important, I guess,» said Chan - Hie, «once they brought
in the Holy Spirit.
The only escape at this point is to take shelter
in the
doctrine of the
Trinity, which offers to furnish a social relation between persons all
of whom are perfect.
Bultmann called into question not only what could be said about the
Trinity, but developed an entire system
in which history's effects on
doctrine must be overcome so that the Christian message might be meaningful for the concrete individual
of the historical present.
The technical term is the
doctrine of the Atonement, although this has never been officially defined
in the same way as the
doctrines of the
Trinity and the Incarnation.
The
doctrine of the
Trinity is often formulated
in ways that obscure the unity
of God.
The greatest source
of difficulty, however, is not
in the Bible but
in a misunderstanding
of the
doctrine of the
Trinity.
However we take the
doctrine of the
Trinity, as ontological affirmation or as symbolic expression, it is essential to the way
in which the New Testament sees the relation
of God's love to his redemptive action
in Jesus Christ.
The answer was the
doctrine of the
Trinity, that there is One God
in three persons.
By the
doctrine of the
Trinity Christians have, however, wanted to say more than that God's activity is known
in three ways.
[T] he
doctrine of a
Trinity is found both
in the East and
in the West; so is the ceremony
of washing; so is the rite
of sacrifice.
Am not anti-Christ nor Anti-Jewish just like all Muslims am a monotheist so must be rather Anti-Polytheists & Disbelievers... but believe me it is not hatred but rather pityness for the innocents and hardness towards the wicked transgressors... Guess that is all about it unless few
of our brother got the message wrong!?! Since we learned from the Quran verses that there will be
in paradise from the Jews, Christian and others from other beliefs... and since God forgives any thing else other than to assign for him partners as polytheists do, then that means many
of Christians and Jews are monotheist towards God although might show otherwise
of fears from dominant
doctrine... As it seems few Christians have realized some how they were wrong some where, then had to introduce that
Trinity to correct it to show as if monotheist but made another mistake by having God the One Divided into Three then and remained Divided as Three as now and for eternity...!?
In particular, they have driven home to me the importance and significance
of the Christian
doctrine of the
Trinity.
In this way, the doctrine of God is grounded in the divine economy, and the understanding of the immanent Trinity flows from the economic Trinit
In this way, the
doctrine of God is grounded
in the divine economy, and the understanding of the immanent Trinity flows from the economic Trinit
in the divine economy, and the understanding
of the immanent
Trinity flows from the economic
Trinity.
Darrell L. Guder (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1980); Jürgen Moltmann, The Crucified God: The Cross
of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism
of Christian Theology (New York: Harper and Row, 1974), The
Trinity and the Kingdom: The
Doctrine of God (New York: Harper and Row, 1981), and God
in Creation: A New Theology
of Creation and the Spirit
of God (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1985); Robert Jenson, The Triune Identity (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982).
Most Christians believe
in the
doctrine of the
Trinity, a description
of God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
1See Eberhard Jüngel, The
Doctrine of the
Trinity: God's Being is
in Becoming (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1976) / and God as the Mystery
of the World, trans.
Polk's article correctly zeroes
in on one
of the major challenges that Pannenberg's
doctrine faces: how to preserve the real openness
of the future
in light
of his insistence on a completed and changeless immanent
Trinity, a final eschaton, and the primacy
of the future?
Applying Royce's understanding
of community to the
doctrine of the
Trinity, one could say that the three divine persons are one God by reason
of their common participation
in an ongoing process
of interpretation which is their life
in community.
Christians, Catholic, evangelical Christians and Pentecostal Christians all believe
in the
Trinity; that's the historic
doctrine of the church, that God is three -
in - one.
Once you realize that the Bible does not purport to be a textbook
of science, the old controversy between religion and science vanishes... The
doctrine of the
Trinity is much more abstruse than anything
in relativity or quantum mechanics; but, being necessary for salvation, the
doctrine is stated
in the Bible.
In recent years, however, certain West German theologians, notably Jürgen Moltmann, Heribert Mühlen, and Eberhard Jüngel, have «rediscovered» the
doctrine of the
Trinity as the basis for contemporary Christian belief and practice.
The first volume sets forth the
doctrine of the
Trinity, which
in Jenson's view must include also the treatment
of Christology.
Applying this to the
doctrine of the
Trinity, Jüngel suggests that the Father, Son, and Spirit enhance their previously existing relationship to one another through the decision to give
of themselves to their rational creatures: the Father through the gift
of his Son to us, the Son through freely allowing himself to be given as such a gift, the Spirit
in virtue
of his activity as mediator, not just between the Father and the Son, but now likewise between the Father and his adopted sons and daughters (GGW 446 - 53, 505 - 14).
3
In the only passage from The Problem
of Christianity where the
doctrine of the
Trinity is discussed at length, Royce does not make clear whether he affirms an ontological triunity
of persons within the Godhead or simply a distinction
of divine persons within the religious experience
of the believer (PC 135 - 39).
In recent years I have reclaimed a very old and very important Christian way
of speaking about God: the
doctrine of the
Trinity.
The
trinity is a false
doctrine invented by the «church / government» at the council
of Nicea
in 325 AD so that the pagans would feel more comfortable allowing the church into their system.
It is not clear how Volf's perspectives about ordination address this «culture
of professionalism»
in modern churches that draws a sharp demarcation between clergy and laity and pays no mind to the
doctrine of the
Trinity.
Perhaps the
doctrine of the
trinity was doomed to failure from the start, because it tried to express
in the ontological language
of the hellenistic world an understanding
of deity belonging to the tradition
of Jerusalem.
The
doctrine of the
trinity didn't even exist
in the first church.
But a truly social
doctrine of the
Trinity contains the vision
of a community
of women and men
in church and society without privilege or subjection to each other - or to God.
It does reveal, however, the shift
of emphasis which took place
in the early centuries
of the Church from the
Trinity of experience to the
Trinity of doctrine.
If the word person is taken
in that sense, the
doctrine of the
Trinity can come appear to be tritheism or belief
in three gods..
Gregory
of Nazianzus was involved
in one
of the early attempts to formulate a definitive
doctrine of the
Trinity, and he wrote, «It is difficult to conceive God but to define Him
in words is an impossibility....
Nowhere
in the New Testament will you find the word «
Trinity,» nor any speculative
doctrine about it, but you do find «the grace
of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love
of God and the fellowship
of the Holy Spirit.»
Both Christians and Muslims believe that God is One, although some Muslims
in their criticisms
of the
doctrine of the
Trinity have appeared to think that Christians believe
in more than one God.
The 18 authors
in this collection ask whether the feminist revision
of Christian language changes classical Christian
doctrines (especially the
Trinity) beyond recognition.
Thus the Word
of God gradually took a place similar to that
of the Memra
in Jewish theology, and the Second Person
in the Christian
doctrine of the
Trinity.
In her article» «Batter my heart...»: On Sexuality, Spirituality, and the Christian
Doctrine of the
Trinity,» Coakley sets out three «axioms»
of her approach to the
Trinity.
748)
in his refutation
of the Christian
doctrine of the
Trinity, which he considered a plurality
of eternal attributes
in one Essence.
Some Further Reflections on the Origins
of the
Doctrine of the
Trinity,» Coakley writes that «it is the perception
of many Christians who pray either contemplatively or charismatically that the dialogue
of prayer is strictly speaking not a simple communication between an individual and a distant and undifferentiated divine entity, but rather a movement
of divine reflexivity, a sort
of answering
of God to God
in and through one who prays.»
Stringfellow asserts, «Forgive us, bishops one and all, if we profess to discern
in these three affirmations a suspicious resemblance to the
doctrine of the
Trinity.»