Unfortunately, much of what is written these days on blogs on climate is too much like religious defenders of an unproven
doctrine than a discussion to figure what work needs to be performed to reduce the uncertainties in the knowledge of the mechanisms that affect climate.
Not exact matches
The
discussion will be somewhat more extensive
than otherwise appropriate to this context because this
doctrine is crucial to other theological positions as well as to that of Thomism.
This consideration might lead us to ask whether Gaine could have added a little more constructive (and less defensive)
discussion of how — after the
doctrine of Christ having the visio was dropped — our contemporary reengagement with it might be more
than a mere retrograde move but an important locus for ongoing theological discovery.
The reader is referred to the
discussion in The Living God and the Modern World, pp. 108 - 41 where Peter Hamilton outlines the problem of the traditional
doctrine of the after - life more fully
than we have room for here.
Significant convergences on doctrinal issues have not ceased, as in, for example, the Lutheran — Roman Catholic Joint Declaration on the
Doctrine of Justification (1999), but these convergences tend to be the outcome of
discussions already well advanced in earlier decades and are to be attributed more to institutional inertia
than to continuing enthusiasm.