Sentences with phrase «document disclosure order»

«The Electoral Commission has today (15 July) announced that as part of its investigation into the Conservative and Unionist party campaign spending returns it launched on 18 February 2016, it has withdrawn its application to the high court for an information and document disclosure order.

Not exact matches

«What the United States said, and it appears in the open documents of this case, is that the disclosure of these documents by order of our courts would be «likely to result in serious damage to US national security and could harm existing intelligence information - sharing between our two governments»,» the foreign secretary said.

New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman ordered the nonprofit waging an expensive legal war against Pier 55 to file financial disclosure documents, a...

The dispute over Clinton's email practices now threatens to shadow her for the rest of the presidential campaign after the disclosure that the F.B.I. collected nearly 15,000 new emails in its investigation of her and a federal judge's order that the State Department accelerate the documents» release.

The other bills signed Friday prohibit most outside income, eliminate stipends for leadership posts, convert the job of City Council member to full - time from part - time and order financial disclosure documents go online.

While documents or other material from state agencies and the executive branch are presumed to be public unless there is a specific exception, the opposite is true for the Legislature: Items have to be specifically denoted as public in order to be eligible for disclosure.

Did th» scientists involved delete emails or other documents related t» th» IPCC process in order t» prevent disclosure o» information subject t» Dead Man's Chest laws?

In the recent case of DA v. LA disclosure documents produced by Vancouver collaborative high net worth divorce lawyers were ordered to be poroduced by the collaborative lawyers despite claims of privilege.

The Court also ruled that if an order for disclosure of the agreements was subsequently made, it was minded to restrict the use that could be made of the documents, including by restricting access to ENRC's legal team, and not providing copies to certain identified senior officers of ENRC itself.

But the respondent had declined to go so far as to produce any of the documents of which the judge ordered disclosure.

FPR 2010 r 21.1 (1) anticipates such a list in the family court, but this is rarely anticipated, still less ordered, by the court (eg, most disclosure in financial remedy proceedings is dictated by production of documents with Form E (the parties» financial statement)-RRB-.

A disclosure order may cover not only documents on servers or employees» hard drives, but also material on employees» portable hard drives, USB drives, DVD / CDs, PDAs, mobile phones etc — and it may be to a party's advantage to push for the production of such materials where an opponent is thought to have useful material in such forms.

If the head, acting judicially, were to find that such an interest exists the head would exercise the discretion conferred by the word «may» and order disclosure of the document.

• (a) and (b) do not directly relate to the parent's statement; • (c) a legal practitioner is entitled to advise a client of (i) the provisions and import of s 98 of the 1989 Act and (ii) the ability of the police and / or a co-accused to make application for disclosure into the criminal proceedings of statements, reports and documents filed in the care proceedings; • (d) it is wholly inappropriate and potentially a contempt of court, however, for a legal practitioner to advise a client not to comply with an order made in care proceedings; • (e) it is wholly inappropriate and potentially a contempt of court for a legal practitioner to advise a client not to give a full, accurate and comprehensive response to the findings of fact sought by a local authority in the threshold criteria document.

Disclosure orders will be extended to money laundering and terrorist financing cases, requiring disclosure where someone is suspected of having information or documents relevant to an investigation.

Importantly, whatever order is made in relation to disclosure, even if that is for Model A (No order for further disclosure), the parties are still under a duty to disclose documents that adversely affect their case, of which they are aware.

Judge Kirkham found that on both grounds of «without prejudice» privilege and based on contracted confidentiality as between the parties, it would be wrong to order disclosure of the mediation documents.

In light of the defendant's failure and unwillingness to comply with the order made by Stinson J., its late disclosure of important documents, counsel's uncivil conduct leading up to and at the trial, and the repeated failures of the defendant's counsel to comply with the directions and orders of the court, it is appropriate for the court to exercise its discretion to deny the successful defendant its costs.

The defendant relies on Dholliwar v. Yu, 2015 BCSC 670 and Dos Santos (Committee of) v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 2005 BCCA 4, for the proposition that the disclosure of these documents is necessary in order to prove what the plaintiff received in compensation in the prior accidents and to prevent injustice through potential double compensation.

(1) The specific residence address and telephone number of the child, parent or person, and other identifying information shall not be disclosed in the pleadings, notice, other documents filed in the proceeding or the final order except for an in camera disclosure;

No interim orders can be made without consent, but procedural directions concerning document disclosure and the schedule for hearings, discoveries, and a trial date can be dealt with at this first hearing.

In Destiny Investments (1993) Ltd and another v TH Holdings Ltd and another [2016] the High Court granted a third party disclosure order requiring auditors of a company to disclose confidential client documents relevant to a dispute between shareholders.

[31] Confidentiality of a relevant document is not a justification for refusing to disclose it, though confidential documents are often protected from public disclosure by protective orders.

In order to strike a balance between fulsome disclosure and privacy rights, the Courts have developed a law known as the «implied undertaking of confidentiality» which prohibits a party who receives this forced disclosure from making use of the documents / information outside of the lawsuit without consent of the other parties or a court order.

However, the confidentiality of a relevant document is not, of itself, a justification for refusing to disclose it, although it may be relevant to the exercise of the court's discretion to order disclosure.

civil injunctions, including freezing orders and search orders, and orders for disclosure of information and documents.

When making an order for the production of documents, the tribunal may determine that a document (or class of documents) is protected from disclosure on the grounds of privilege.

Now, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada recently found that in order to properly rely on the s. 7 (3)(h. 2) exemption it is essential that an organization document the purpose for which personal information is disclosed and exercise due diligence to ensure that the disclosure is reasonable under the circumstances.

In a document titled The Case for Reforming the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act the Commissioner recommended that the law be amended to require private sector organizations «to publicly report on the number of disclosures they make to law enforcement under paragraph 7 (3)(c. 1), without knowledge or consent, and without judicial warrant, in order to shed light on the frequency and use of this extraordinary exception.»

The Foreign Secretary successfully appealed against an order for disclosure of secret documents to the Inquest for the death of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko.

Specifically, in order for a plan sponsor to obtain without authorization protected health information from a group health plan, health insurance issuer, or HMO, the documents under which the group health plan was established and is maintained must be amended to: (1) Describe the permitted uses and disclosures of protected health information by the plan sponsor (see above for further explanation); (2) specify that disclosure is permitted only upon receipt of a written certification that the plan documents have been amended; and (3) provide adequate firewalls.

The Bank intends to apply for a suspended committal order against Mr Vik for giving untruthful evidence and failing to provide full disclosure of documents and information in that context.

In order for the group health plan to disclose protected health information to a plan sponsor, the plan documents under which the plan was established and is maintained must be amended to: (1) Describe the permitted uses and disclosures of protected health information; (2) specify that disclosure is permitted only upon receipt of a certification from the plan sponsor that the plan documents have been amended and the plan sponsor has agreed to certain conditions regarding the use and disclosure of protected health information; and (3) provide adequate firewalls to: identify the employees or classes of employees who will have access to protected health information; restrict access solely to the employees identified and only for the functions performed on behalf of the group health plan; and provide a mechanism for resolving issues of noncompliance.

First, we proposed to permit such disclosures pursuant to a warrant, subpoena, or other order issued by a judicial officer that documented a finding by the officer.

National arbitration statutes generally contain only limited provisions on disclosure and recognise parties» autonomy to determine procedural issues, while institutional rules usually give tribunals a wide discretion in relation to disclosure, ranging from ordering parties to produce any documents they consider relevant (Art 22 (1)(e), LCIA Rules), to granting them a general mandate to establish facts through appropriate means (Art 25, ICC Rules).

Your mediator will collect the financial disclosure documents to make sure everything is in order.

She researches complex family law issues, prepares client disclosures, drafts Requests for Orders and Memorandums of Points and Authorities, and prepares trusts, wills, and estate planning and family risk management documents.