In a colourful and memorable passage the Court noted (at para 49) that ``... furnishing answers to questions that went to the heart of the treaty rights at stake in the form of a practically inaccessible
document dump months after the questions were initially asked in person is not true consultation.»
To put it mildly, furnishing answers to questions that went to the heart of the treaty rights at stake in the form of a practically inaccessible
document dump months after the questions were initially asked in person is not true consultation.
Not exact matches
Months later, answers to these questions were
dumped online in a three thousand page
document (mostly in English only).