Sentences with phrase «document review because»

Law firms have wanted to have their people do the document review because they then capture the profit associated with that review.

Though I needed the money, I was nervous about document review because most of what I heard about it was negative: undesirable work environment, long hours, not valuable legal experience, and unrewarding work were just a few.

We should be concerned about how we approach classifying document review because it is the first of many stages of a litigation file to be excised and contracted out.

This process greatly reduces the time needed for e-discovery and document review because the program is searching for concepts as opposed to simple keywords.

Not exact matches

When documents reviewed for production in connection with committee requests reminded me that meeting had occurred, and because of the language in the email chain that I then read for the first time, I included that meeting on a supplement.

«We have looked at the budget document closely and reviewed the manner in which it was supposedly passed by our colleagues on the Board, and our conclusion is that the result is flawed because of potentially disqualifying procedures during its enactment,» said BOL Chairman Ken Jenkins (D - Yonkers).

And because training is never perfect, documents under review should be anonymous.

We used the UN Panel report as our baseline because this document was reviewed and coordinated on by the US government and internationally respected by the scientific community.»

Haddad adds that it's important to have structure to your reviews and documented outcomes, because when audited, the focus is often on trails of evidence.

Because all «academies» are, in principle, accountable to the secretary of state for education rather than to local authorities, Gove was ultimately responsible for the decisions that led to this situation, which has been carefully documented by inspectors from Ofsted, England's independent school - reviewing body.

As the Los Angeles teachers union continues to try to organize educators at the city's largest charter school network, teachers at one of the few independent charter schools that joined the union voted to leave it after less than two years because union officials were pushing their own agenda, according to interviews and documents reviewed...

As the Los Angeles teachers union continues to try to organize educators at the city's largest charter school network, teachers at one of the few independent charter schools that joined the union voted to leave it after less than two years because union officials were pushing their own agenda, according to interviews and documents reviewed by LA School Report.

We believe schools would be able to use the [self - review] document for school improvement plans because the document is about best practices, not prescription.

One negative commenter went so far as to show his entire back and forth email exchange, and the documents of how he got a refund from a credit card dispute because he documented that the review clearly did not match what the book was about.

Google Drive I don't do much editing of Google Documents through my iPad because I find it much faster to do that on a Chromebook or laptop, but I do use Drive for reviewing Documents that have been shared with me.

Having been a risk manager inside two life insurance companies, when I reviewed the documents, I was surprised, because they were so much less sophisticated than what life companies of a similar size did.

finally got hold of someone at the irs and they transferred me to the review dept. the woman in the review dept told me they have recieved my documents (which they did nt because i still havent recieved the notice of what they needed) after trying to tell this woman they had not recieved anything from me she finally told me what i needed to send.

That review is often a lengthy process because insurance rate filings are complex documents.

It's possible to get condo developments added to the VA's list, but that process can take time because the department needs to review condo documents and other information.

Because no published peer - reviewed studies have examined the use of FMT in dogs or cats, a group of veterinarians at a 2015 international meeting of gastroenterologists formed a research committee to document the state of the art.

As a review of the performance of This objective at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London notes, «the space contained only actors, and the work is not documented in any way» because Sehgal forbids its audiovisual reproduction.

Perhaps it is because the same procedures have been adopted by many other assessments in many other contexts; the National Academies of Science, for example, produces consensus documents from diverse committees and panels that are subjected to expert review from selected external scholars (and it is perhaps noteworthy that NAS reports occasionally feature signed dissents on particular points).

You can't fail to document key bits simply because peer review journals don't care about that bit or would tell you that bit is already published in another document.

On the basis of this case study if judicial review is not available, either in law; or because F does not have the knowledge or resources to fund an application; or if there can be no challenge to the Commission figure at the liability order stage, then F will be fixed with a sealed court document which, on the above facts, represents an unchallengeable misrepresentation of the true facts.

And because putting one's name to a document means taking responsibility, any lawyer publishing content under their name written by somebody else would be well - advised to review the draft before publication for errors, diction, syntax, etc., and make appropriate edits.

Many lawyers in this class were upset, he says, because on the one hand they were told that they needed to be members of the bar and insured by LawPRO, the errors and omissions insurer owned by the Law Society of Ontario, in order to perform the document reviews, «but they were also told that high school students could do this work.»

Arguably, graduates of DNS would be even more qualified to work in document review jobs than graduates of traditional law school programs because the focus of their studies would be specifically on serving in that role.

The truth is, you really can't afford to not have a lawyer draft up or review your legally binding documents and contracts because the consequences could cost you severely.

Other associates will lag behind their peers — perhaps because they got stuck on a long document review; or they work in a practice area that doesn't require intensive legal writing; or these associates began their careers as poor writers and have done nothing to improve their writing.

Nearly two years ago, I posted that bar rules allowing firms to mark up the cost of U.S. - based contract lawyers without disclosure gave firms incentive to treat contract lawyers as profit centers, and discouraged them from offshoring document review, because in that situation firms would be required to disclose their markup to clients.

Offshoring document review to India hasn't gained much traction with most law firms, in large part because of concerns about security and quality control.

A: We chose lease review because the documents were readily available.

It might be that we have [inaudible] the attorneys because attorneys are focused more on the client relationship than they are sitting in an office reviewing the documents for four hours.

Adam Losey: I agree with Elliot and I like everything he says and I like what you say about some of the work going away from lawyers, because nobody went to school to review 30,000 documents, or to do trademark filings over and over again, or to do residential foreclosure forms, filling out over and over again.

There's an order of magnitude, someone said that 30 percent is the right order of magnitude, because we probably review 70 percent less documents.

Many online reviews skew negative because satisfied customers are less emotionally motivated to document their experiences.

Because realistically, a tiny watch screen is always going to be a terrible place to review documents.

In 2006 the firm selected Ringtail Legal for its customizable web interface and ability to handle very large document sets, and because the collaboration features on Ringtail complemented the legal review team's procedures and workflows.

Because no two cases are the same, Predictive Discovery can be customized in accordance with the goals and requirements of the document review.

I have had some students tell their TAs40 that they believe that the interviewing, negotiating, drafting, and document review exercises are irrelevant because they do not cover «what is on the bar.»

«Acuity is the go - to managed document review offering for leading corporations and law firms because it is a smarter approach to document review,» said Sophie Ross, Senior Managing Director, FTI Consulting Technology practice.

(A gain curve provides a simple but effective means to compare the results from a technology assisted review and a linear review because it shows the cumulative number of positive documents that would be found throughout the entire review process.)

But because LegalZoom, through its website, collects information from consumers, incorporates that information into personalized documents, reviews the documents for «quality,» and provides email and telephone assistance through non-lawyers, it engages in the unauthorized practice of law.

Thus, the excuse that lawyers give that they must review all documents because they are preparing for trial is not practical.

Because document review sets may have a variety of native file types (i.e..

«While the preservation, review, and production of ESI often involves procedures and techniques which do not have direct parallels to discovery involving paper documents, the underlying principles governing discovery do not change just because ESI is involved.

'» [72] The documents described in (2) above issued by the Supreme Courts of Pennsylvania and of Georgia and by the NOBC and CCJ evidence that, with respect to the regulation of legal services, it would be impossible for a state's review mechanism to provide any kind of «realistic assurance» because, in fact, there is no state review mechanism to speak of — the regulators have abdicated their regulatory responsibilities to persons who can only be described as «active market participants.»

Because of the limited scope, duration, and brevity of the communication (s) exchanged between Participating Attorney (s) and Eligible Members within the Question & Answer product, participating attorneys who receive questions may not have had an opportunity to conduct an independent investigation relating to your transmission, to review pertinent documents, or carefully research the applicable laws.

Otherwise, the issue of third - party provision of document review and other legal - like services has been so confused that in September 2015, a lawyer employed by a document review company, who spoke on condition of anonymity, self - reported to the LSO because the lawyer was concerned that the company was engaging in the unauthorized provision of legal services.

This outcome is not precluded merely because the documents linked appear in a widely read law review or even in a decision of the highest court of a land.