Nor would I imagine that BigLaw firms would be interested in applying for admission pro hac vice for the dozens of
document reviewers who might come and go on a case, and courts would hate it.
Not exact matches
[Dec. 14, 10:55 a.m. Update The climate panel has issued a statement on what it described as the «regrettable» posting of the
documents by a
reviewer who had agreed to confidentiality.
The
documents were posted Thursday at Stopgreensuicide.com, a Web site launched by Alec Rawls, a passionate foe of restrictions on greenhouse gases (with a very quirky pedigree)
who signed up — like almost anyone could — to be one of 800
reviewers offering more than 30,000 comments on this draft report, which focuses on the basic science examining the extent of the human influence on the climate system.
Especially given that, as I said above, anyone
who wanted to take part in the review process and give their opinion on the draft
documents had the opportunity to do so by applying to become an «expert»
reviewer.
The fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was prematurely published on a blog called Stop Green Suicide by blogger Alec Rawls,
who obtained the
document as a
reviewer.
Procom then charged Deloitte a fee amounting to $ 3 per hour — a charge passed on to the
document reviewers,
who received no benefit from the arrangement.
With thumbnail and on - demand full - screen shots of each
document reviewer's computer desktop, you have complete and instant access to monitor
who is working and what they are working on, from any computer, anywhere.
Often,
document reviewers are attorneys
who understand the legal and factual issues in the litigation and are able to make the necessary judgment calls as to privilege and responsiveness.
Licensed attorneys
who are experienced in
document review generally earn rates at the higher end of this salary scale while non-degreed, entry - level
reviewers earn rates at the lower end.
His resume format would include his role as a
reviewer who has to ensure content and structure of testing
documents is as per the standards.