In fact, it is heavily recommended that one must carefully go through the pertinent
documents like the privacy policies, etc so as to ensure that the posted information remains confidential.
For other data, businesses might already provide these notices in
documents like privacy policies — but they should review these in line with the new law.
Not exact matches
Making Change of our Policy We would
like to inform our users that as they use this website, we may revisit our
privacy policy
document to make some changes.This is done to improve the efficiency of our services to the users and make it more suitable as you use it.ln case of making change to our
privacy policy
document, Top 10 Herpes Dating Sites notices all users before any change is made.We are therefore advising all users to be reviewing
privacy policy
document most of the time so that they be aware of any changes.
Accordingly, in the absence of an explicit or legislated public restriction, the only sustainable personal
privacy protection approach for public
documents like court judgments derives from the exclusion of personal information at the time it is written.
I just posted a comment on the new Royal Bank of Canada v. Trang decision from the Supreme Court of Canada (Supreme Court of Canada permits disclosure of mortgage
document over debtor's
privacy objections), but there's an aspect of it I'd
like to dig into further.
The problems I encountered were: (1) obfuscation ensured lawyers were the only conduit into the system (the process is now easy to understand with all of the new services and interactive flowcharts); (2) most of my legal fees where for services that did not require a law degree; (3) the most expensive errors were legal errors and there was no reasonable recourse for recovery; (4) the court administration was unable to handle the volume; (5) simple but essential administrative tasks,
like filing
documents, required either half a day or $ 100 + for every single filing; (6) Security and
privacy are completely ignored, unlike every other profession; (7) there is no incentive, nor is there a governing body to ensure the matter is handled in an ethical, humane, timely manner; (8) lawyers have a monopoly and charge more than the market can bear for personal litigation.
Where the
document sought to be produced is the analysis of an accused's blood extracted for medical purposes following an injury accident, the
privacy interests engaged are more
like those engaged in a body search.
According to this line of thought, the more people think of Google as the way they send emails, navigate while driving, or share
documents, the less they'll think about issues
like tax,
privacy, and extremist content on (Google - owned) YouTube.
The service provider could be hacked and have it stolen,
like all information provided online so you have to trust they will handle your
documents with
privacy and security.