Sentences with phrase «does libertarianism»

Here's my question: does Libertarianism offer a plan for the Least of These that doesn't require a complete change in human nature?

How did libertarianism, once a noble impulse, become synonymous with injustice?

Not exact matches

«I don't entirely agree with the foundation of Libertarianism, which is very anti-government, «Koenig says.

But one result of our creeping and somewhat creepy libertarianism is that the infrastructure that makes such caregiving — done mainly, let's tell the truth, by women — possible is imploding too.

The old alliance between sensible LIBERTARIANISM and SOCIAL CONSERVATISM can't hold in the face of the vanishing middle class, the birth dearth combined with increasing longevity, the depoliticizing challenges of the 21st competitive marketplace, the irresponsibility of our techno - meritocracy, our inability to keep Locke in the Locke box on issues having to do with families and our erotic lives, and the connection between increasing individualism and growing dependency on the state summed up in the phrase «single mom.»

That Lindsey is not able to find common cause with best successes of libertarianism in the national arena suggests that Cato is probably wise to want to distance its brand from Lindsey's liberaltarianism, if that is in fact what it is doing.

But if I had done it, I would have concluded with a tirade against Ron and Rand Paul libertarianism.

To avoid what he so beautifully calls «a hostile polity contemptuous of truth, justice, law, and beauty,» Christians need to do more than draw empty distinctions to libertarianism.

Does the thinking of Ayn Rand go hand in hand with your understanding of Libertarianism?

I think the philosophies of Christianity and Libertarianism are VERY compatible and can be summed up in the verse «Do onto others as you would have them do to you&raquDo onto others as you would have them do to you&raqudo to you»

The current social neo-conservative does not reconcile itself well at all with classic libertarianism.

The term «Libertarian» is fuzzy, and the ones that find the GOP appealing are merely adhering to one definition of libertarianism in the US and don't represent all libertarians.

About libertarianism being a strain of conservatism, well, it's debatable (I'm not saying it's false, just that's not consensual)... since libertarian transhumanists are not so uncommon, I didn't consider then in my question as a possible answer.

For one thing, what we call «libertarianism» in USA today was originally called «classical liberalism» - and AFAIK is still called that in Europe (don't tell any of the modern liberals in America who get allergic reaction from a mention of Mises or Ayn Rand:) If you mean «modern...

There are many reasonable reasons why people do not like libertarianism.

I also didn't vote for Nick Clegg in the leadership election, gave him the benefit of the doubt but his bullish behaviour in not stepping down after a series of dire election results and sanctioning orange bookers libertarianism means to me he must go and asap.

I would overhear hushed conversations on the bus about Republican relatives who won't stop gloating; directors would introduce their films, even the most purportedly apolitical, with sly allusions to the new President; a woman even struck up a conversation with me before a screening to complain about the film industry's closed - minded attitude towards her particular brand of libertarianism (I didn't have much to add).

NiV does present an articulate case for Libertarianism, and says

I don't think that the aesthetics of the environmentalism movement should be the main driver of people's decisions with regard to the environment, any more than the aesthetics of libertarianism should decide what people do about their civil liberties.

The black / white interpretation of libertarianism was popularized by Ayn Rand's «objectivist» philosophy, and doesn't necessarily describe or govern every libertarian's ideals, including mine.

Not to mention, I don't think Dr. Curry has hesitated to acknowledge the link between skepticism and conservatism / libertarianism on one hand, and the consensus and liberal / progressive views on the other.

«I don't think Dr. Curry has hesitated to acknowledge the link between skepticism and conservatism / libertarianism on one hand, and the consensus and liberal / progressive views on the other.»

The editor of Reason magazine (a libertarian glossy monthly with obvious ties to Objectivism) didn't know what to make of it — as it would seem to be the attempt to wed Libertarianism to some form of theocratic government.

But opposition to doing something about anthropogenic global warming comes largely (although not entirely) from two different sources: fossil fuel interests and the ideology of libertarianism.

@Freelander When i get a moment, i plan a piece demolishing this line of research, which is exactly as you describe it, silly - clever schoolboy libertarianism done by people old and smart enough to know better.