I think this speaks volumes more about your character than
it does about atheism.
Not exact matches
There is much that could be said
about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that
atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of
atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of
atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of
atheism, they prove that their
atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving
atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
Atheism says: don't waste your life dreaming
about rewards after death.
ATHEISM does not make claims
about what was before the BIG BANG either.
Non-belief (
atheism) is a cruel and vicious god that
does not care
about us humans.
You said I don't know anything
about hard or soft
atheism, an assumption on you're part so tell me what is it to you?
Actually Jesus you're wrong
about what
Atheism said, prayer changes things by not
doing anything and allowing the natural (disastrous) course of events to transpire.
Your constant trolling and provoking
do nothing but turn people away from thinking
about Atheism.
@edgelbraith — i assume you are talking
about your religion of
atheism and I have to agree that some of you are very childish (in addition to being hateful, petty & devoid of compassion for others) but I don't think it's fair to lump all of you in a group like that.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking
about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how
Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
I don't know much
about Silverman or his group, but if the billboards are a way to gain publicity for
atheism, I think his intentions are misguided.
I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and
atheism provide examples of lay persons talking
about a science they don't fully comprehend.
If
atheism is
about a belief that there is no god, why
do you need an organized system to spread this belief?
Atheism is simply a lack of belief in god and says nothing
about how we raise our children (other than implying that we don't brain - wash them with religious indoctrination).
Dalahast; you said «I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and
atheism provide examples of lay persons talking
about a science they don't fully comprehend.»
It proves that some people make a religion out of
atheism, but it doesn't prove anything
about all atheists.
its not really
atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking
about, you assume to know what something is
about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its
about being aware of who you are?
We don't say there are six types of Theists, we focus on the Religions, and that is what is missing — a modern Religion / Belief system for Atheists — as
Atheism does not mean without rules, just
about whether God exists or not.
TheLies» comment above
about your post as usual conveniently ignores the critical point that crimes
done by Stalin et al were not
done under any guidance of
atheism, whereas the guidance to
do the many atrocities that Christians have
done can be found in the many horrific instructions «from god» presented in the Christian book of nasty AKA the bible.
But what
does this really tells us
about religion, belief,
atheism?
A «group of drunks» that atheists talk
about has nothing to
do with the concept of a supernatural being intervening in your life being regarded as something other than
atheism.
I don't understand Atheists like u who read Xtian history and feel
atheism is
about being anti-religious!
Don't worry
about what other Christians might be thinking of me, you are giving a pretty good image of
atheism and gay lovers yourself.
Your
atheism is going down the drain, even some of yours are turning to God now, if you don't believe me then just search CNN there was an article a couple of days ago
about one that
did.
Taking atheist statements
about religion and then substituting
atheism for religion generally results in nonsense; all of your posts
do that.
If you have any further questions
about me and / or
atheism, please feel free to write me at
[email protected] Despite my moniker, I don't bite — most of the time.
They don't need to know
about homosexuality and
atheism and racism and evolutionary theory.
I really feel that the organization is going
about this in the wrong way... I don't understand why they are trying to make
atheism into a religion... if they want to have a billboard then let them have a billboard but it should be more passive instead of attacking other religions... live and let live
Not all atheist are created equal just like all Christians are not the same so before you say things like «
atheism is so sad», please consider that you really
do not know what you are talking
about and it is not your place to judge how I think or feel.
I don't entirely disagree with the posts above, but my understanding is that for plain - old main - stream
atheism, it is best defined by talking
about belief versus lack of belief.
On the other hand, people who comment on feeds from advocates for
atheism, like Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris, are going to be commenting
about something they don't like or approve of — religion.
So when your talking
about Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc. it wasn't their
atheism that made them
do the evil things they
did any more than say their lack in the belief in unicorns.
If you are trying to weaken the legitimacy
atheism by calling it just another belief system, what
does that say
about the legitimacy of your own beliefs?
Lots of stories here are
about atheism, but that doesn't stop Christians from giving their opinion that we're all going to hell.
Most atheists consider
atheism a small part of their lives and don't talk
about it or think
about it much.
I remember a story was
done here
about a famous woman converting from
atheism to Catholism and atheists called her the most vicious and vile names I've ever heard.
I care a lot less
about atheists in the country, the real problem is atheists in church leadership and congregants who don't see their
atheism.
If there was one thing I could get religious people to understand
about Atheism that they currently don't, it's that we aren't offended simply because you happen to believe something we don't...
Ultimately,
atheism is not
about trying to prove that G - d doesn't exist, it is
about trying to elevate men to the postion of G - d, which is arrogant.
Jay I'm not talking
about atheism; what I'm saying is that critics of evolution don't actually read any real books by actual scientists
about the subject.
It's hard to hate something you don't believe exists... so, not sure what you don't understand
about the word «
atheism».
If it really has been «
done to death,» then I can think of numerous topics that have been
done many times more than this topic (at least where I'm at and interact): faith, hope, love, prayer, fellowship, giving, good works, christian unity, salvation, grace, faith healing, being culturally relevant, the gospel, the resurrection, religion vs. relationship, tithing, worship, reverence, christian music, legalism, old vs. new covenant, Paul's conversion, miracles, gifts of the spirit, sign gifts, tongues, nativity, the disciples, crucifixion, materialism, mysticism, new age,
atheism, i could probably list
about 50 more if I thought
about it.
Hearing stupid atheists respond to my posts is the best evidence that i'm right... you get all these angry morons that don't have a clue what they're talking
about trying to attack my argument, «BUT THOSE PEOPLE WHO MURDERED MILLIONS THEY WERE N'T DRIVEN BY
ATHEISM TO KILL»....
You look at this article
about Catholics converting to Protestant and it has nothing to
do with
Atheism.
GOPer: We
do have co-ncrete data for
atheism vict - ims so com - paring with those unknown / va - gue / mys - tic data
about Christianity victims is unfair
You atheists know who you are, so don't argue
about it, go talk with the Humanist Atheists, you don't have to give up
atheism, but you can not keep writing off the world's religions because they are quite frankly the most important deciding factors in whether this world will survive much longer, whether there will be chaos in the world or order.
You don't seem to know much
about current evolutionary theory nor
atheism, based on this pathetic, simplistic, childish rant.
why
do nt the atheirst preach
about No God and attract followers make the money, guys get off lazy butts and preach
atheism then in a trully capitalist society we will see who wins.
From Steph: What
do you
do when one of your kids asks a question
about either
atheism or Christianity?
I'd be interested in hearing more
about the distant past around that time, but I don't need an answer on that issue to determine my theism or
atheism.