Sentences with phrase «does challenge the idea»

Not exact matches

There's this undeniable endorphin rush, a good natural energy boost — and I like the idea of starting the day by doing something challenging.

Carrots and sticks are fine, but when you violate who we are as people, when you challenge our pride, when you don't respect what we need... the quality of your idea doesn't really matter.

Be courageous, challenge people to come up with the next idea - incremental or great, it doesn't matter.

The idea was to have students describe their challenges in waking up in the morning for class and to obtain their feedback on a new product designed to help them do so.

You'll be so fixated on the challenges that you won't step back and realize you're already there.With skateboarding, at some point I was on top of the world, but I had no idea because I was so busy and so focused on doing it.

When challenged, they don't give in too easily, because they know their ideas, opinions, and strategies are well - informed and the result of much hard work.

After the fact, you can review the obstacles and challenges that emerged during the task and ask for ideas on how things could have been done differently.

Specifically, it's always a good idea to review what worked, what didn't work and why, and think about what you will do in the upcoming year to learn from past challenges and build future strengths.

And if you don't believe in an idea or care about its success, it's harder to rise above the inevitable challenges and this will show in the results.

But as Virgin grew through the years, so did our ideas about how to treat employees well, and how to take environmental impact into account, and by 2004, I had come to realize that we at the Virgin Group had a chance to tackle the challenges our society faces in a new, entrepreneurial way.

But it has given the sleepy nonprofit world a brief, bracing splash of cold water — and brought home the idea that social media and fun, easy - to - do challenges can have a big impact on social causes.

Perhaps the greatest thing about the Internet is the fact that it does allow that lone individual to turn an idea into a business and challenge much larger companies and institutions without having to face many of the same road blocks.

While there are many things you can do to find a solution for these challenges, it all begins with getting the right content ideas.

The challenge with innovation, she says, is that a lot of businesses will brainstorm big ideas but they don't commit the time or the people to make it happen.

[109][110][111] Corzine later wrote that only after the proposal was released did he discover «the harsh reality: the public intensely disliked the idea» and that, in retrospect, he «should have pressed harder to identify the most salient arguments against the plan and developed a strategy to get in front of and respond to those challenges.»

Greenlight said it informed Apple on Wednesday of its intent to challenge the proposal, and that the company promised to reevaluate the idea, but did not remove the proposal from the ballot.

Nevertheless, innovators continue to face challenges from Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs), companies that, in the President's words «don't actually produce anything themselves,» and instead develop a business model «to essentially leverage and hijack somebody else's idea and see if they can extort some money out of them.»

And by doing that, we'll be able to help push the conversation towards a new, more modern understanding of America's middle class challenges — and spur fresh ideas for a new era.

The panel of judges will be looking for three key criteria when they evaluate the proposals of this year's Walmart Green Student Challenge submissions: the winning idea will present a new way of doing business, have a significant sustainability benefit, and have a strong business case to back it up.

And has mainstream economics done enough to respond to its own failure to predict the crisis and the challenge posed by Minsky's ideas?

I would tell someone just starting their career here at Franklin Templeton that they should not be afraid to contribute ideas, challenge the way that things are done, or speak up as I have found that colleagues and leaders are always open to hearing what you have to say and will act upon ideas if they feel as though it would be beneficial.

Nye wasn't there to debate whether or not people should be allowed to believe in Creationism... he was simply there to challenge, as has always had to be done, the idea that beliefs should be taught right alongside science as though the two were not mutually exclusive.

«Prospective employers do not want a future workforce of graduates who seem thin skinned, humourless and brittle, but rather one that is composed of well - rounded people who have learned to challenge, reject or embrace some of the new and difficult ideas they encountered as students.

You are correct for once, faux Christian — you have no idea what to do when you are challenged, so you revert to responses that amount to sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting LA LA LA LA LA.

The claim, «You don't believe the Bible is true» is nothing more than a smokescreen put up by manipulative religion to discredit or ignore a challenging teaching or idea about the Bible which disagrees or contradicts what that religion teaches.

And as it turns out, though many of the believers in these churches know their Bibles well, few of them actually live out what they know in their day - to - day lives, nor are they reaching out with the gospel, which challenges the idea that these sorts of churches are actually doing a good job making disciples.

By leaving out this important information and by failing to seriously explore those biblical passages that, at least at first glance, don't seem to support his thesis, Bell has left his readers ill - equipped to deal with challenges from those who don't agree with these ideas.

IF you continue to contend that god exists in more than an idea... get back to us... if not there is no serious challenge that can be logically considered by those who are intellectually doing their best to be honest with what is known..

This only proves how much failed you are from challenging the contents of the Quran and all you managed to do is making accusations with out a slightest idea of what you are talking about never even cared to take the beauty and leave out what you think of as beast rather than letting out all... but what the use of me talking to a brick of wall that has no religion faith that we can consider as a candle light to guide you to the straight paths to God..?

Fundamentalists do much more than simply react; they are enormously creative in formulating their own ideas and in modifying these ideas to meet new challenges.

Such technologies hold tremendous possibilities, but it would be naïve to imagine that they don't pose fundamental challenges to our ideas of what it means to be human.

Question the ideas behind religion, challenge its claims, and push back against its malfeasance, but don't make a habit of attacking the people.

Some might think Podhoretz was unfortunate in his friends and others might think his friends were unfortunate in him, but he is grateful for the contentious entanglement of friendships and ideas that has brought him to where he is as one who intends to challenge «the regnant leftist culture that pollutes the spiritual and cultural air we all breathe, and to do so with all my heart and all my soul and all my might.»

What I've decided to do is live freely myself while challenge all ideas, beliefs, traditions, powers and systems that threaten the well - being and liberty of all people everywhere.

My goal was to playfully challenge this idea that the Bible prescribes a single lifestyle for how to be a woman of faith, and in so doing, playfully challenge our overuse of the term «biblical.»

We don't see God, therefore we challenge the idea of God.

Though Falcke did not propose an alternative social philosophy, the idea that something (not capitalism) outside socialism could improve socialism challenged many and threatened some party leaders.

Although it challenges the dominant inherited theology, it does so in ways that release the most convincing features of the Christian faith from immersion in incredible and damaging ideas.

I want to challenge you with this idea: Christians don't have to bathe the world in black and white.

The idea of God the Creator challenges your desire to be your «own god» which allows you to do whatever you want, whatever «feels» good at the time (which is called humanism).

It does n`t handle complicated or challenging ideas very well.

In Psychopathic persons, mortifications may be entered on irrationally, by a sort of obsession or fixed idea which comes as a challenge and must be worked off, because only thus does the subject get his interior consciousness feeling right again.

In respect to human experience, Berkeley challenges us to explain «the complete concreteness of our intuitive experience,» a phrase that is consonant with his insistence that concrete reality consists in just those ideas we do in fact have.

I have always been in favor of giving the mentally challenged every chance to improve their lives, but I don't think electing a whackdoodle like Michelle Bachmann to the presidency is a good idea.

If you were an intelligent person you would understand the value of reading about opinions you do not hold, it is called challenging your own ideas and putting them through the microscope of reason.

Even though I went to a pretty liberal church, the senior pastor did not like his ideas challenged.

I wanted to challenge the idea that «biblical womanhood» could be reduced to a list of roles and rules, and I wanted to do it in a creative, disarming way.

But I do want to challenge the idea that if I struggle, it means sabbatical time.

Thus, while it does not automatically accept any radical or novel idea, religious naturalism can help us to be genuinely open to the continuing challenge of the ideal aspects of transcendence, and thus willing to entertain radically new ideas and approaches.

The form of argument in this presentation has emphasized several specific points: first, that the Asian values argument, as a challenge to the implementation of constitutional democracy, is exaggerated and fails to account for the richness of values discourse in the East Asian region - local values do not provide a justification for harsh authoritarian practices; second, that the cultural prerequisites arguments fail because they ignore the discursive processes for value development and they are tautological, excessively deterministic and ignore the importance of human agency it, therefore, makes little sense to take an entry test for constitutional democracy; third, the difficulties of importing Western communitarian ideas into an East Asian authoritarian environment without adequate liberal constitutional safeguards; fourth, the positive role of constitutionalism in constructing empowering conversations in modern democratic development and as a venue for values discourse; fifth, the importance, especially in a cross-cultural context, of indigenization of constitutionalism through local institutional embodiment; and sixth, the value of extending research focused on the positive engendering or enabling function of constitutionalism to the developmental context in general and East Asia in particular.