Sentences with phrase «does crimes against humanity»

This country does crimes against humanity, that country does, too.

Not exact matches

FOR ENTIRE 66 YEARS, ON DAY TO DAY BASES, ALL THEY WERE DOING IS CRIME CONTEMPLATING AGAINST US INSIDE OF THEIR BACK OFFICE CUBICLES (on job torture / bullying / mobbing and forceful unemployment to progress humanity as Obama exclaimed over and over) PER EEOC AND NOW, THEY WANT YOU TO RAISE COMMUNIST FLAG UNDER AMERICAN SKY!!!

We, along with our numerous allies, had no probelm intervening once sentences were passed regarding the fate of certain Nazi party members, who clearly were engaged in crimes against humanity - even though the laws didn't even exist during the time of Nurnberg.

They do not deserve to live, much less continue to get away with their horrific crimes against humanity and all those millions, even billions, of defenseless children throughout their history!!

The pope did the right thing by demeaning the perception that some people committed a crime against humanity by having Jesus die.

We need never fear the charge of crimes against humanity so long as we hold the power to define who does and who does not belong to «humanity.»

If any government on Earth made a practice of detaining anyone who didn't follow the party line indefinitely, and torturing them constantly once detained, they would be branded as committing crimes against humanity and international criminals.

Also... We didn't sit idle and watch crimes against humanity... we went after people like the Nazis and KILLED them.

@peace2all If you want to spearhead legislation, I sure wish you could get rid of that «freedom of religion» that so many scuzzbuckets like Phelps find so convenient as they do their psychotic crimes against humanity and individuals.

For example, a man even after committing the most terrible and atrocious of crimes against humanity remains a man biologically; he is still a «rational animal» — i.e., essentially distinct from an animal — but within the context of society, he does not belong.

Having established that the Holocaust was an unspeakable crime against humanity, the questioner then invites those being interviewed to make a provocative connection: «How do you feel about abortion?»

There are many in the gay camp who do not deserve support... some are hateful, bigoted and have committed crimes against humanity... someone used John Travolta as an example...

This woman and her Fascist Right wing Nazis need to sit in prison for their crimes against humanity because I am not the only one these cold blooded lying murders did this to, and they deliberately will not have anyone obey Court Orders and get me Medical Records together, and get me Medical Doctors to address my Medical Concerns, and get all my Doctors on the same page, because they intended all along on messing up my Medical records while causing me serious medical harm, and then letting me die from Medical Neglect so that they could falsely blame me or environmental factors and they even have the Police deliberate to refuse to investigate why they removed Tests from my Medical Records that showed the harm that they caused.

Btw: No need to capitalize «he», that would be indicative of respect being warranted and your imaginary friend doesn't merit respect nor would it if it were to magically appear this minute - in fact it would be arrested and sent to prison for its crimes against humanity.

Now, after much discussion on the previous page with Austin on the crimes committed against humanity in Uganda, he still doesn't show any signs of sympathy for the victims, but writes «the dude in uganda is a psychotic retarded satanic attack on nothing of any value».

You should have realized by now, Austin, that my beef is rather: «Why does something written 1.5 thousand years ago causing crimes against humanity in Uganda today by way of many of its adherents?»

Some of the worst crimes against humanity were done in the name of god.

When will it become a crime against humanity to do this?

At the end of June 2016, a number of Nobel laureates accused Greenpeace's campaign against Golden Rice as a «crime against humanity «and called upon governments around the world to «do everything in their power to oppose Greenpeace's actions and accelerate the access of farmers to all the tools of modern biology, especially seeds improved through biotechnology ``.

Surprisingly, there is relatively little conceptual work done on crimes against humanity and genocide to pinpoint what they are and what makes them particularly abominable.

But these two reasons alone don't seem to be sufficient, because the attitude to the Second World War in general seems to be totally different in the two countries, not just with regard to «crimes against humanity».

While commending the Nigerian Military for doing their best to halt threats to citizens as exemplified by Boko Haram, IPOB, Avengers and other groups complicit in crimes against humanity, Global Amnesty Watch sees Amnesty International as constantly demonizing nations that are battling terrorism and setting the ground for killers to embed themselves among migrant populations to spread to these other peaceful countries.

Dave Asprey: Do you think that there will ever be executives from the companies who make this stuff, who have seen those research, are they going to be held responsible for crimes against humanity, that's a serious question?

Although this decision might make the film more accessible to a wider audience, as it is easier to understand what Amin does when it seems to be a direct result of information that cuts to his very core, it does weaken the larger political story overall by making the focus more about crimes of passion than it is about crimes against humanity.

Hank: You don't have a scale, you don't have a method, and you're accusing people of crimes against humanity because they don't do what you say.

You don't have a scale, you don't have a method, and you're accusing people of crimes against humanity because they don't do what you say.

That such analyses don't exist (AFAIK) is a crime against humanity and the planet.

There are so many modern discoveries, research and data that are standardly «denied» if it doesn't fit the «old school» ways, ideals or chriteria, which in itself, is a crime against science, and moreover, against humanity as a whole (the general population), don't you think?

Though, I don't necessarily disagree that this constitutes a crime, not just against humanity, but against ecosystems worldwide.

P.S. BTW If the climate change cartel ever do decide to prosecute we sceptics for crimes against humanity, it's me that will be in trouble not you.

I already think there will be a day (if it doesn't get omg is it cold soon) that most of us will be put on trail for crimes against humanity.

My climate enemies have done scientific and other academic frauds; they've destroyed, withheld and pretended to misplace scientific data in order to prevent the human race discovering things about nature; they've forged documents to frame people they don't like; mendaciously and publicly accused innocent people of deplorable crimes that carry prison sentences; betrayed the trust reposed in their professions by fraudulently abrogating to themselves the magical competence to diagnose entire swathes of the (perfectly healthy) population with thought disorders just to score points in an academic bitch fight; deliberately and self - servingly lied to * massive * audiences about the way science itself works — than which I can't for the life of me think of a greater crime against humanity in the recent history of the developed world, can you Joe?

Well, advisory opinions of this kind do not involve «crimes against humanity» (complete aside, how is ignorance and the fate of the planet not within the jurisdiction of humanity?

An elemental question begs to be corroborated in more than one way for sheer fairness: When the main pushers of the idea that the «reposition global warming» phrase insinuate it is proof of an industry - led disinformation effort employing crooked skeptic climate scientists — Naomi Oreskes saying it indicates a plot to supply «alternative facts,» Gelbspan saying it is a crime against humanity, and Al Gore implying it is a cynical oil company effort — are they truly oblivious to the necessity of corroborating whether or not that phrase and the memo subset it came from actually had widespread corrupting influence, or did they push this «evidence» with malice knowing it was worthless?

This, coming from a historian who apparently needs some kind of time travel ability in order for her tale to be plausible regarding her discovery of who her «tobacco - associated critics» were, and this overall concern coming from a side of the issue which doesn't merely believe global warming mitigation efforts are just a sensible thing to do, there's a moral imperative to stop those who are committing crimes against humanity.

Oh well at least the ABC's newest resident bartender / copy boy will now have Auntys protection to let his minions once again accuse Lord Monckton of being a «terrorist» guilty of «crimes against humanity» as he did in his blog prior to the debate, that is if he isn't whimpering in the foetal position in a dark corner remembering the spanking he got last time.

The movement to make ecocide a crime against peace under international law, led by UK - based lawyer Polly Higgins, as well as efforts to grant legal rights to Mother Earth, such as Bolivia has done, is exactly where we need to be going in terms of the highest level of environmental thinking: Recognizing that destroying whole swaths of the planet, with little to no concern for the effect on all the creatures that live upon it, is not just unethical, unacceptable behavior, but is also a crime, a crime against humanity, a crime against life itself.

Article 1 (F) provides that the Convention does not apply if there are serious reasons for considering that a person has committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity (1F (a)-RRB-, a serious nonpolitical crime (1F (b)-RRB- or acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations (1F -LRB-(c)-RRB-.

It does not include the challenges of state sovereignty, state immunity, international law or crimes against humanity.

What the International Criminal Court (ICC) was able to conclude was that the Darfur situation did consist of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

If the ICC does place charges against Israel, there will be strong pressure to do the same against Gaza, as both sides are accused of war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity.