Sentences with phrase «does early matters»

Talking about cognitive tasks during childhood, Dr. Carol S. Dweck at Stanford says: «Our message to parents is to focus on the process the child engages in, such as trying hard or focusing on the task — what specific things they're doing rather than «you're so smart, you're so good at this... what (the adult) does early matters.»

Not exact matches

«No matter where I am in the world, I try to routinely wake up at around 5 a.m.. By rising early, I'm able to do some exercise and spend time with my family, which puts me in a great mind frame before getting down to business,» he explains.

It didn't help matters that Fisker's battery manufacturer A123, which also borrowed from the same DOE loan program, filed for bankruptcy earlier this year.

«The reality is that film doesn't matter nearly as much to the stocks of media conglomerates as it previously had,» wrote Barclays Capital analysts Anthony DiClemente and George Hawkey in a report earlier this year.

Mind you, I do think the discovery of dark energy is worthy of a Nobel, but over Rubin's discovery of dark matter over 20 years earlier?

«It doesn't matter what they tell you, as an early stage company, you can not justify a retainer of $ 8,000 to $ 10,000.

Schroepfer said it was a «mistake» that Facebook hadn't notified users of the data leak earlier than it did, echoing CEO Zuckerberg's comments on the matter earlier this month.

Of course whether the adjustment begins in 2012, 2013, or 2014 probably doesn't matter much to the analysis, but it is good news, I think, that it may have started earlier than I originally expected.

As for arming teachers as the President indicated support for earlier Wednesday, Rubio said he did not favor that, both as a father and as a matter of practicality.

As a general matter, early stage entrepreneurs don't just need money, they need help and advice.

Early in my career, my obsession was with creating these «cash generators» that would bring in investment capital no matter what I did with my day.

He also enjoys writing at coachcarson.com about using real estate investing to retire early & do what matters.

My objection to Ford's claim that an earlier phase exists before a later phase, in a genetic sense of «exists before,» does not conclude that the difference between phases is merely a matter of complexity of eternal objects.

So, you admit that each generation could change them and therefore you DO N'T know what the earliest one said, much less beginnin with the creation of matter, energy and time.

@ Live4Him: «So, you admit that each generation could change them and therefore you DO N'T know what the earliest one said, much less beginnin with the creation of matter, energy and time.»

As I said earlier, I don't think that means that orthodoxy doesn't matter.

Now in his earliest metaphysic embedded in Science and the Modern World Whitehead did address a problem common to philosophers of that period: how to find a workable substitute for space, time, and matter, the discredited notions of scientific materialism.

To return to the earlier parable, ideas do not much matter if they are held or being debated by men whose investment in them is as remote as that of the man high on the cliff who idly speculates about the options available to men threatened with drowning.

In fact, an examination of the academic literature in the area makes it clear that irrespective of any ethical or moral considerations, most of the controversial measures simply do not reduce early pregnancy and may make matters worse.

(The matter of contemporaneousness does not arise this early, though.

Vic — you are essentially saying that a property of physical behavior of early matter or energy that we don't yet understand is evidence of god.

Early on, having admitted the difficulty of speaking of ultimate mystery at all, he adds, «This does not mean that it is not worth saying, that it is just empty talk... I do have some things to say, but... I want it understood from the outset how problematic all of this is, how uncertain; but however uncertain, these are matters worth attending to, worth trying to understand as well as we can.»

The message of this book is that democratic life should be conceived not as an enterprise of autonomous men, no matter how clever they may be in organizing to pursue their interests, but as a way of realizing the Will of Heaven — that is, of doing the truth and serving the right in which man's proper being and destiny consist, This is another manner of signifying the «public philosophy» earlier mentioned.

At an earlier time, I taught from Romans 8:38 - 39 that no matter what we do or say, nothing can separate us from the love of God.

It was indeed only in the early Renaissance, in the liturgical drama which influenced the subject matter of the newly recovered art of painting — where the resurrection did get attention — that Magdalene was returned to prominence and became for the first time an officially popular figure.

Just because one group of people 2nd the opinion of another earlier group of people, does not mean that the opinion is the opinion of God (assuming God even exists and has an opinion on the matter).

you'd think if god was truly the god spoken of then faith would be unneeded and belief a thing of the past — yet — people will believe whatever they wish no matter the proof or lack there of and its truly sad to consider that this delusion type mass brainwashing is going on right now and has been for over 2000 years... please don't let the time in which this sm.ut has been around make you think its worth its wieght in salt — i bid Lot's wife its not — in ALL early man stories from around the globe people have created GRAND stories about the start and end of times — its that simple.

The fact is that we don't know what happened in the early seconds of the universe, and no matter what we will conclude there will always be the question what was before that, a little like the hen and the egg.

No good purpose is served by concealing this fact, as is often done today when things that are really incompatible are combined by the following type of over-simplified reasoning: that whatever in early Christian teaching appears to us irreconcilable with the immortality of the soul, viz. the resurrection of the body, is not an essential affirmation for the first Christians but simply an accommodation to the mythological expressions of the thought of their time, and that the heart of the matter is the immortality of the soul.

Early signs were that he was not local to Jericho, and became embroiled in matters that had nothing to do with him.

That man who does not believe that each day contains an earlier, more sacred, and auroral hour than he has yet profaned, has despaired of life, and is pursuing a descending and darkening way... It matters not what the clocks say or the attitudes and labors of men.

The early Christians did not suppose the cross, for example, to be the end of the matter.

While your freedoms are certainly limited — you can no longer date or crash at a friend's house or hit the bars until early the next morning — it doesn't matter, because now you have someone committed to love and serve alongside you.

It is true that deterrence did not fail utterly — if it did no one would be here to debate the matter — but it came very close to failing, for example during the Cuban Missile Crisis and again during the early 1980s.

In his earlier works, especially his internationally famous first novel, The Moviegoer (1961), the outward events do not matter really so much as the narrator's witty meditations on his own inward life and the life of the world.

And I fondly remember those «early 20s money doesn't matter let's order appetizer, salads, entrees and desserts» days.

Earlier in the year, I had my heart ripped out of my chest, stomped on, and broken by a guy whose name doesn't even matter to me now.

No matter how much earlier I wake up or if I set my clothes out the night before like a third grader or if I have my lunchbox all ready to go... it doesn't make a difference.

It didn't matter that it was already 11 p.m. and we had to wake up early to drive to a family reunion 130 km away.

It doesn't matter how tired you are, or that you already ate dinner, or that you've got an early flight.

Instead we had a squad that does what it always does which is fall apart at the seems as a results of injuries and, IMO, bad mentality or weak will power, resulting in a run of results when it mattered most (as per usual) taking us out of contention early in 2016.

Waiting to hear from all the 4th place junkies... Too early in the season to tell right the referees weather??? what f ****** more excuses do u need other than the one that matters

I'd say we would have gotten a CL place if done earlier, though I don't think we'd have won the league or even come close for that matter.

The fact is that Sims and Newcomb are not setting the world on fire in 2017 and that Dansby hit so poorly in early 2017 that he was sent down... this doesn't matter.

I said earlier no matter the cirumstances around the club i wanted us to stay in the EL & have a real go... did nt disappoint tonight, now on to next Thursday at Home!

What's more important though, is they've continued to look better over their last 5 Games than they did in the early parts of the season and no matter what their record is come Playoff time, as long as they are playing this way, they'll exceed all expectations that their seed will provide.

I've always maintained my stance that Arsene Wenger loves French players in his team than any other players.No matter how average you are once you're French and once you're in the first team he tends to give you so many chances to prove yourself.I can start mentioning them if you want me to but I know you know them.If Lucas Perez was French he wouldn't have been out so early believe me.I just don't know where to begin.Was Giroud bought to become a super sub or to be the leading striker?Having giving us many sesons of failure people are now content with him being a so called super sub.A player like Giroud is not built for that kind of role.He ws a super sub in 99 % of those matches because he was not played when he was supposed to and we needed presence in the air.The funny thing is people are using only this season to label him as a super sub.There were so many matched that Wenger should have started Giroud but for some reason didn't start him.I only see Arsenal as the top club who'd be crying over Giroud.If a good offer comes we should sell.

The prevailing wisdom is that if Chicago doesn't improve through the air the team will be bounced from the playoffs early, no matter how great its defense plays.

A common trend i've noticed in other windows is looking over at our rivals early movements as though it makes any kind of difference if you sign the players now or a month from now... I'll let you in on a little secret... It doesn't matter!!!!!! A lot of the top players are either on holiday or playing international's freshening up for the coming season.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste