Sentences with phrase «does everything it claims»

I've been interested in this, but really wasn't sure if it could do everything it claims.
For all intents and purposes, the Nook Tablet does everything it claims it will.
its fast, responsive, looks great and above all, does everything it claims to do and more.

Not exact matches

Advocates of homeopathy — which involves diluting an active ingredient until there's no measurable quantity left — claim that the treatments can do everything from relieve colds to calm anxious pets.
At the best of times, everything a CMO does is a gamble with ephemeral and uncertain results; that's a hundred times truer now, with marketing tools multiplying faster than anyone could truthfully claim to keep up with.
Don't let the illusion of perceived influence fool you into trusting a leader who isn't exactly everything she claims to be, and don't fall into the same trap yourself.
«Most employees think that the best way to show value to their boss and get promoted is to aggressively claim credit and ownership over everything they do,» BlackBerry CEO John Chen wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this year.
«Most employees think that the best way to show value to their boss and get promoted is to aggressively claim credit and ownership over everything they do,» writes Chen in a recent LinkedIn post.
However, there are really simple — and inexpensive — ways to get your cold brew done at home, and you'll find five of the best options below, with everything from the $ 19 Takeya pitcher to the new and exciting Dash Rapid Cold Brew System, which claims to be the world's first rapid system.
When DDI surveyed more than 500 employees and 500 business leaders, they found a high percentage of bosses claimed they do everything in their power to encourage their team to come up with creative solutions.
The cynic in me, of course, doesn't believe Freddy's claim that under the Cooperative, everything will be better.
«We will do everything we can to assure that these claims do not distract us from our ongoing efforts to rationalize...
It's sad that the ones claiming to be the most intelligent, didn't want to be friends with the most intelligent being in existence, the one that created everything they'd study, and knew their end from the beginning.
Your own behavior proves it.Just like Tom Tom you don't care what some Christian says.You disregard everything but claim that whatever may change your mind.
But God don't lie... he made you and he claims everything he made is good.
Everything «good» that religion claims can be done full well without it in the first place — things such as charity and compassion.
Its all nice and fun to pretend that perhaps a meteor strike caused life to begin but you still fail to tell me who created that meteor, who created everything that was needed for life to exist... really... that had to of been a start to it all somewhere and I would love to see an atheist stumble on explaining only «what they claim to know» while refusing to believe what they don't know and can't see.
This is bible speak for reminding people that dad, while and absent and neglecting father will come back one day and claim all of the glory and take credit for everything that was done without his help.
Finally, I don't think I need to offer statistics to address such claims as women are «taking control of everything» and «starting to dominate» among «doctors, lawyers, bankers, accountants.»
since he didn't we can assume that phrase (like everything else he claimed to have uttered) should be attributed to the Egyptian sun god Horus for whom Jesus was completely plagiarized from.
I am a believer who does not claim affiliation to any sect because they all add their own prejudiced dogma most of which is that you have to believe that everything in the bible is beyond refute.
Afterall does nt the bible claim that everything else on this planet is for your enjoyment!
The bible claim that God knows everything is not dis - proven by sheer rejection of the theology (where we just choose not to believe) nor can it be rationally rejected just because we do not know (we'd be displacing rational approaches with our own theology).
------ By the way, Bob, I don't claim to understand everything.
The «my jaw dropped open» moment: Dawkins says he humbly admits that science does not know everything and Bill jumps in to claim that humility is after all a Christian trait.
What would say to those who would claim that because God does not lie Titus 2:1, and that He is perfect, that to say His word is inerrant would contradict everything the Bible has to say?
I would never suggest that everything atheists do makes sense or is good, just as I hope you wouldn't try to claim everything Christians do makes sense or is good.
Just like everything else in the world, there are those that claim to be something but do not follow the actual teachings of that religion.
I do not claim that we believe in everything, nor that we are free to.
Besides no one said I was an athiest, but unlike you I don't claim to know everything, but leave myself open to see the world through proof.
They spent most of Monday doing their darndest to make everything worse, from defending manhandling a customer («We followed the right procedures») to blaming the passenger himself (claiming he was «disruptive») to coining a laughably bad neologism to describe their treatment of him («re-accommodated»).
Radical theology isn't everything and doesn't claim to be.
People call «elite - style snobbery», but then claim to have the «truth» themselves, even if that truth is that everything is all good and you get to live in «heaven» as long as you pick what's right for you and do good things.
Second, I have never claimed that as a human I will have the answer for everything, but the one answer I will never use is «if I can't understand it, it must the doing of a supernatural being».
You have got it all wrong, but may I ask that what poof do you have about what you claim, Allah is the almighty and is not a deceiver, Allah in the Qur» an in referred as the most merciful, all forgiving, creater of everything and self subsistence he does not require anyone to support him and Allah is having no son neither wife, and tell me how can a almighty supreme being have sexual relations?
Atheists do not claim to know everything, they simply are not convinced by the things that have convinced you.
She claims she doesn't need to read it, because the title tells her everything she needed to know.
Even if you would know everything there is to know about Shinto, that does not give you the right to claim that god (or gods) is protecting a specific building from a tsunami, on the top of a hill, no less.
I don't see anyone claiming to know everything, so I guess you're just talking about your god or something right?
Nowhere does the Bible claim to be a book of science or a book that explains everything.
I don't believe for one moment he knew everything and I've never heard anyone claim he did.
suni people is true islam, although some are claimed to be suni, but suni is not terrorism or sheit, suni is that we do everything allah told us to do and forbiddent all things he forbided, and as his prophet mohamed says and did.
Atheists don't claim to know everything or everything — that's retarded — nor does Atheism connote a positive theory of the impossibility of the supernatural.
Religious and political institutions claim that everything they do is advancing the rule and reign of God on earth.
The unlimited freedom of everybody to claim absolute freedom for everything works like a sort of secret brain - washing by anonymous powers which does not necessarily abolish freedom but narrows in advance the sphere in which the individual can make his free decision.
... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.
Sorry — that post was meant to be (another) response to someone else claiming that the author didn't know what he's talking about and that Rand would be against everything the country has become.
It does, however, turn the eyes of theologians away from heaven and toward the earth; or, more accurately, it causes us to connect the starry heavens with the earth, as the «common» creation story claims, telling us that everything in the universe, including stars, dirt, robins, black holes, sunsets, plants and human beings, is the product of an enormous explosion billions of years ago.
An honest person who openly disagrees with you on a few things is a better choice than a dishonest person who claims they believe everything you do, and secretly disagrees with you... or even disdains you for your gullibility.
SOCIETY VS SAID: «Then how is this man can be claimed to have felt and went through everything we do?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z