Sentences with phrase «does give the event»

It is not open to the public which, for a summit advocating pro democracy, does give the event an exclusive and isolationist overtone.

Not exact matches

«You don't want to give the mom - and - pop shareholder who may not have seen the reports the ability to Google it,» Robertson says, speaking generally of how companies respond in such events.)
The point is I would have never been given the opportunity to save the company if I had anything other than a narrow say - do gap in the two years leading up to that event.
Given Apple's iPad performance and broader market challenges, it becomes clearer why Apple didn't decide to hold a big iPad event like it would have several years ago.
On Monday, at a breakfast briefing with journalists before he took to the stage at Advertising Week Europe — Brittin said the annual ad industry event gave Google a «good opportunity to say first and foremost, sorry, this should not happen, and we need to do better.»
His company, tech startup Applico, is also enjoying the attention that Johnson's achievement has brought: Johnson did an interview with CBS New York at the office and gave a presentation on Pokémon Go at a company - sponsored event.
Accordingly, no assurances can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward - looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what impact they will have on the results of operations or financial condition of Oracle or Vocado.
Say you decide not to attend a networking event because you don't want to give up an hour of your time.
Not only does the event give its ad a much bigger viewership than it might normally have had, it allows Wells Fargo to be consistent with its branding and market message.
This not only positioned him in the more profitable side of the event business, it gave him a way to negatively position his competitors: «Yes, they do very nice weddings.»
This didn't appear to hurt Spotify much, given its brand cachet among a wide swath of US households, as average Joe retail investors were willing to gobble up enough shares to get the company's liquidity event rolling.
Fun Fact: Says Heath: «We've always placed a focus on staying personally connected to the mission first - hand, so in addition to hosting regular team giving events, we also developed our Hive Initiation program: On the day that each new employee joins Bombas, before doing anything else, they are given 10 pairs of donation socks to walk around the city [with] and hand out, while interacting first - hand with those living on the streets.»
The Brazilians who did make it to the arena for more gymnastics were given a nice surprise — two medals in the men's floor event, from Diego Hypolito and Arthur Mariano who earned silver and bronze behind Britain's Max Whitlock.
It's important to build those networks and events like this are a great way to do that, giving great exposure to young companies just starting out to VCs, angels and advisors.
«The point of doing this is to give a hardcore smack down to gasoline cars» says Musk before a cheering crowd at the event.
I generally don't comment on our positions or the Hussman Strategic Growth Fund in my regular market comments, but given yesterday's tragic events, it seems appropriate to make an exception.
This great event will allow customers to discover their own beauty while doing their part in giving back to the community to help women, Feel, Look and Live Better for Life.
Kahlon added, «I've also never heard of an instance where the B.C. Liberal government gave out a $ 200,000 grant just before an election and didn't hold an event to draw attention to it.
Thursday's event comes hours after Trump acknowledged in a tweet he repaid his personal attorney, Michael Cohen, for hush money given to the porn actress after previously claiming he didn't know about the payments.
Active tracking systems also give you the capability to track your vehicle in the event that it is stolen, which is impossible to do with passive tracking systems.
The event production company was struggling and Raja needed more money to keep it going, so he decided to continue knocking on doors, but instead of giving the jobs to the landscaping company, he decided to do the job himself.
We promised another article about peer - to - peer trading, but given the events of yesterday, when the Winklevoss Twins had their Bitcoin ETF denied and panic selling ensued, it's a good time to talk about what to do when the prices drop sharply in a short period of time.
Hugh Hewitt's interview gives you a good overview, as does the earlier Human Events essay linked, and over at Ricochet, D.C. McAllister has begun a series of posts that will examine the proposals one - by - one.
Nor does Copleston, who spent half the academic year at the Gregorian university in Rome prior to and during Vatican II, give us any insight into the intellectual ferment that shaped that decisive event in contemporary Catholic history.
@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.
Muhammad may not have condemned Isa outright, but did give an alternate version of events surrounding the crucifixion and ressurection, an account that contradicts the Word of Isa.
«By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.
Just because there were (likely) more «Christians» than followers of other religions, doesn't give them the right to display any symbol in a more prominent fashion than those of the religions of any other person that died in that event.
Amy Mandelker has drawn attention to the term «reverse perspective» as used by Russian Orthodox theologians to describe the unusual dimensions of icon paintings, with the gaze of the viewer drawn to the level of earthly events and yet given a peculiar perspective, as from a heavenly seat, so that people and objects do not have their expected everyday appearance.
However the events given in this passage never did come to pass.
There are many specific things in life for which we simply can not give thanks, concrete events before which all the humanity within us recoils and for which we could never forgive ourselves if we did give thanks.
«matt — just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anything.
just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god
Above all, Christian worship is rejoicing in what Christ has done for us, a form of God's self - giving in which the historical events are again offered to us.
This «child» you allude to, funny how you don't give a name, or when he was a kid or any other specifics but you are implying that although he was not born during WWII he had experiences of events that happened.
The New Testament does not give us a doctrine of «nature», a doctrine of the authentic nature of man; it proclaims the event of redemption which was wrought in Christ.
Not all events involve a mind, but some do, and it may be that what gives the character and creative advance [sic] to the whole of nature and every part of nature is that there is operative throughout the whole of nature a Mind.
At no point in this process does the incarnate Word or Spirit assume a final and definitive form, just as God himself can never be wholly or simply identified with any given revelatory event or epiphany, if only because the divine process undergoes a continual metamorphosis, ever moving more deeply and more fully toward an eschatological consummation.
The events they describe could logically have been otherwise, although causally they could be only what they are They could not have been otherwise given their causal antecedents, and since the causal antecedents could not causally have been otherwise, there never were any open possibilities for the state of affairs in question other than the one which does in fact occur.
Until moments ago I did not recognize the correlation between the verse (given May 1964) and the events of 24 years later.
This is going to be a shock — the men who actually wrote all the parts in the Bible and made changes to the infrastructure of Christianity — including Constantine circa 300 AD in Rome — were not afraid of unleashing the occasional metaphor... in other words the Bible is not entirely literal — no, you are supposed to use your imagination... In many cases the disciples didn't actually witness an event — it was long distance and time altered hearsay — God figured Man could handle that... So don't be afraid to dilute - God's cool with that — as long as you do the right thing in life — feed the poor, help your neighbor, don't kill or covet - just be a good and decent person - smile, love and give generously... God doesn't need robots — He wants thoughtful individuals who help!!!
2 Given this author's care and demonstrated reliability, as well as his contact with eyewitnesses within the first generation after the events, this man can be trusted when it comes to matters in the life of Jesus for which we do not enjoy independent confirmation.
Looking back on that experience I honestly don't think it was a spiritual event any more than many other events are (though I believe all events have a spiritual counterpart just as there are different physical levels of the universe way can overlay on any given system)
What Heidegger seems to suggest, comments Macquarrie, is that the discovery of truth is not just the result of human striving, does not involve ridding the psyche of all distorting influences so as to hear the truth plainly, but is an event «above and beyond our willing and doing» in which Being gives itself to be known.
For the Western world, the main alternative to the pattern of repetition of the foundation - story in the individual life story developed in the Hebrew and Christian vision of sequential, successive time, a time of historical struggle and openness, a time which did not wash out the unique, unrepeatable event, but dignified it by giving it its own place in the unrolling process.
I was at a July 4 event over the weekend, and when we recited the pledge, my daughter asked why we do it, and I gave her a real short answer... since we were in the middle of reciting the pledge.
The fact is that Abelard was trying to say, with his own passionate awareness of what love can mean in human experience, that in Jesus, God gave us not so much an example of what we should be like but — and this is the big point in his teaching — a vivid and compelling demonstration in a concrete event in history that God does love humanity and will go to any lengths to win from them their glad and committed response.
Christian is here speaking of the concept «event» as used in Whitehead's earlier works; the term doesn't change its reference in the later works, though it practically drops out of the picture as being a less than ultimate concept (corresponding to the notion of a structured society) which gives way to the category of «actual entity» as the term descriptive of ultimate, concrete reality.
At no point in this process does the incarnate Word or Spirit assume a final and definitive form, just as God himself can never be wholly or simply identified with any given revelatory event or epiphany, if only because the divine process undergoes a continual metamorphosis, ever moving more deeply and fully toward an eschatological consummation.17
The Israelite who did not joyfully rest from his work on that day was one who put his hope in his own work rather than in God's election.22 According to de Quervain,»... when our minds are illumined by faith, we see the Sabbath in Israel as grounded not in a sociological event, but in a theological one, the deliverance of God's people from bondage into the rest which he gave them as a token of the final rest.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z