Put otherwise:
Does your God exist?
of buddhistic thinking in germany cause his major askings were not about
does god exist or smth, but «Why do we suffer?
So many of the comments on this thread seem to be engaging in the age - old «
Does God exist?»
Given the necessity of understanding the question «
Does God exist?»
To say that God prevails in these orders would not provide the kind of answer called for by the question «
Does God exist?»
For my understanding of «trust» I am indebted to Shubert Ogden, The Reality of God (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1977); Hans Küng,
Does God Exist?
In its shadow, all the big questions»
Does God exist?
The books that have most influenced my thinking are a pamphlet on the possibility of faith in God by former UMC Bishop Ernest Fitzgerald, Salvation, by Lewis Sperry Chafer and
Does God Exist?
The real question is: In what sense
does God exist?
Whether you call yourself athiest or agnostic isn't as important as how you approach the question, «
Does God exist?»
Even before we get to Genesis we have to first find out 1) what is God and 2) what does «existence» mean and 3)
does God exist, we have not done any of these we just assumed that the other person knows what we mean by these terms, a dangerous assumption at best.
Those who are particularly interested in this question and who are patient and persistent readers may wish to consult Hans K ¸ ng's
Does God Exist?
This is the attempt to answer such questions as «
Does God exist?»
This is surely implied by the question «
Does God exist?»
So our apologetic here isn't answering the question, «
Does God exist?»
of the commentary here is based on the assumption that there is a single true, correct answer to the question, «
Does God exist, and if so, what is the nature of God?»
In my mind there are two variations of the question «
Does God exist?»
The argument becomes — if reason is primary,
does God exist?
Not exact matches
It wouldn't make sense to call oneself a religious Jew if one doesn't really believe that the Jewish
God even
exists.
But one doesn't have to believe no
gods exist to recognise and expose theistic claims as indefensible.»
@Chad «you sure need to address the compelling arguments that
DO exist for the God Don't always just run and hide behind «we do nt know&raqu
DO exist for the God Don't always just run and hide behind «we do nt know&raqu
DO exist for the
God Don't always just run and hide behind «we
do nt know&raqu
do nt know&raqu
do nt know»
Zombie
god does not
exist, not in reality, certainly not in the Tanakh, the only TRUE WORD.
The accounts were given, held onto, and still
exist because
God made the right choice for who to give them to, over history, they didn't forget him.
Live, because deciding for or against it was obviously relevant and important; forced, because one either accepted Christianity or refused it — there was no getting out of the decision; and momentous, because, on the chance that
God does exist, the decision would have eternal ramifications.
Your
god doesn't
exist, Rainman.
00:00 Introduction 07:07 Limits of Science 19:40
God & the Supernatural 31:20 Science & Morality 50:11 Something out of Nothing 1:03:42 The Value of Philosophy 1:20:59 Cognitive Limits 1:35:43 Questions: — 1:35:56 Science & Politics — 1:43:33 The Status of Economics — 1:48:17
Does Consciousness
Exist?
I mean, you can stroke your ego with pride to assume that any
god who
does exist would somehow automatically be very invested in your life, but that's just presumptuous with no reason.
As an atheist myself, this sentence to me implies that you
do believe — «I don't know if
God exists or not.»
Atheists have beliefs that there is no
God, perhaps no one can convince them otherwise, but my thing is, why talk so much about something if it
does not
exist?
Humans have worshiped literally thousands of
gods throughout history, and ever true believer of every one of those
gods felt the same conviction that you
do, despite the fact that there isn't a single shred of evidence that any of those
gods (even yours) actually
exists.
Another thing — people that believe in
God ARE going to teach their children about Him (even if He doesn't
exist as you say)-- why wouldn't we?
I
do nt have to prove
God exists to you.
God sounds like this:»» since he doesn't
exist.
Yes, to believe in
God is ridiculous for the unbeliever, it's true,
God does not
exist for them, even the Bible will support that, and yes, prayer is ridiculous too — that is for the unbeliever; because an unbeliever just doesn't know how or where to see or hear an answer to prayer.
Obviously said author suffers from said sickness as noted in his / her final line: «The fact,
God does exist, it's only Love».
It's difficult to argue that the humble rabbi from the Galilee didn't
exist, but it's incredibly easy to argue that there is no evidence that he was a son of any
god, actually performed miracles, or that much of his legend isn't based upon prior myths of dying and rising hero /
gods.
John If the Bible is inaccurate then how
do you even know that
God exists?
I don't know whether
god does or
does not
exist, but I don't happen to believe in a
god.
This
does not mean any
gods exist.
Atheist
do not need proof thru science that
god does not
exist, and that is what Dawkins preaches, among other things, like hate towards people who believe in
god.
«I
do not know whether
God exists but I'm inclined to be skeptical.»
The proof your
god doesn't
exist the millions, upon millions, upon millions of unanswered prayer s that happen every day.
To say that
God and heaven don't
exist is getting into areas that he is not an expert in.
To say that Jesus was not
God and / or that
God does not
exist is a perfectly reasonable position to hold.
I recall that when
God was not in the picture for me this «turmoil»
did not
exist because others
gods were not real to me.
You assume that
god absolutely 100 %
does not
exist and so without
doing any further investigation decide that now the aliens AND the humans must not be that intelligent, you confirm your own conclusion (see what I
did there?)