Sentences with phrase «does other commands»

There is no mention of a dog that plays, chases, does other commands... but will not lie down even after 2 full days of no food at all.

Not exact matches

The bigger the company, the larger the paycheque you can command — and that doesn't count other compensation such as stock or performance bonuses, common at the higher end of the leadership ladder.

«You need enough self - confidence to command the respect of others, but that needs to be counter-balanced with knowing that there is much you simply don't know,» he writes.

Capt. Kathleen Atanasoff, a spokeswoman for AFCENT, cautioned that the numbers released by the command — which includes assets and actions under the Combined Forces Air Component Commander, or CFACC — don't reflect the «entirety of kinetic activity in OIR,» such as assets belonging to coalition partners or other U.S. components, like the Combined Joint Land Component Commander and Special Operations Joint Task Force.

Last year, Google launched voice typing in Docs, but now lets you customize content with commands for changing text color, deleting words, inserting links and comments, plus a number of other ways to do hands - free formatting.

To do this you'll need to have full command of online tools that allow you to leverage the reach and other capabilities of social networks in a time and cost efficient manner.

But in a competitive world where many other businesses seemingly offer products and services similar to yours, how do you command a premium price?

Conversely, I can simply say your Bible is a work of fiction, like millions of other works of fiction... and therefore i don't need to explain how people can turn to salt or how the seas can part on command, how immaculate conception can occur, resurrection, feeding thousands with some bread and fish, etc..

I'm all for letting you live your religious life as long as you don't harm others, but your religion contains words from your «god» that command harm to others.

If the Pope commands Catholics to ostracize others then that is what these nuns must do.

Jesus didn't command us to politicize — just love each other.

If you are satisfied with ignoring god and his commands, then don't try and tell other people (gay, contraception, abo.rtion) what the bible commands of them.

Jesus did not command that rich man to place taxes on himself and other rich men.

Christians do not then force others to believe anything, but rather go to their homes as Jesus commanded his genuine disciples to do, seeking to discuss, reason and hopefully teach them about our Creator, Jehovah God and his kingdom, for Jesus said just before he ascended to heaven: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations... teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you.»

I want to leave the Baptist church but is very hard for me to do, on the other hand, I find it very hard to kneel in prayer next to them, knowing that they refuse Jesus Calling to become Fishers of Man (Matt 4:19), nor do they obey Jesus Last Command, The Great Commission (Matt.

2 Kings 17:35 When the LORD made a covenant with the Israelites, he commanded them: «Do not worship any other gods or bow down to them, serve them or sacrifice to them.

Why else do people wager millions on lotteries, if not to be rich and therefore powerful and able to satisfy any whim, to command the service and loyalty of others?

Although it does not command the resources in this respect that are possessed by many other institutions, it does offer its own perspective.

Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.»

Until we do what Jesus has commanded us to do by / with His Spirit leading and guiding us NOT man... then and only then will you begin to see the move of His power in your life and in the lives of others.

Jesus really raised the moral bar, though, when he commanded his followers to «do to others that which you would have them do to you» and not merely AVOID doing to others «that which you would not want them to do to you.»

So does God like HYPOCRITES who pick and choose which of his commands to personally follow and which to use to pick on other people?

The God to Whom I relate doesn't command the stoning of a disobedient child (nor the other «texts of terror» in Torah.)

If they believed what they said that they do, they would (1) be happy and not feel the need to convert others — having no command from above to do so, nor any pressing natural law putting such a perrogative on them and (2) would see that athiesm is a loosing bet where the best outcome is not being wrong — as there is no outcome where they can be right, a negative can never be proven.

Virtually all previous representatives of the modern natural law tradition, including Grotius and even Hobbes, had in some way or other related natural rights to divine power or command, which served as the source for the directives of natural law notwithstanding that these did not derive from a divine telos or comprehensive purpose.

Jesus, on the other hand, came to install a Kingdom that was «not of this world» (John 8:23; 18:36) and therefore, did not need to issue commands for His followers to kill others for their common cause.

Jesus» commands are pretty clear — turn the other cheek, love enemies and forgive them, don't take revenge, etc, so it would seem that refusing to fight or support in any way might be the thing christians should do, unless the war is clearly justified.

Loving others is a command from God, but like that of repent and believe the gospel, in and of our selves we are completely unable to do so apart from the working of the Holy Spirit.

The facts of creation in this as in other matters do not of themselves constitute a command, only an indication of what is fitting; and the various forms of ethical unwisdom and indignity which do not transgress explicit commands can not be categorized as sin.

Unless God changes the other people, and most importantly, changes our own hearts, we will never be able to do what Christ commands here.

What really impressed me about the Bible, when I compared it with the other holy books, is that it's the only one that commanded objective testing: «test everything; hold fast what is good» Paul says in 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (ESV), and actually you see how the Bible not only tells you to test, it shows you how to do it.

I'm genuinely curious because I don't like the command to kill passages in the OT, but can't seem to make sense of the story any other way without doing some serious mental gymnastics.

Maybe we do need to give attention to other issues raised in Leviticus and elsewhere, but that is not a license to disregard God's specific command to not do with a man, what we would do with a woman.

If so, does that the mean that the other commandments, such as the prohibitions against adultery or idolatry or the command to honor one's parents, are also no longer relevant for Christians?

As we saw in chapter 2, Jesus could be recognized during his lifetime as a man of peace, who refused to take revenge when mistreated, who did not fight in his own defense or permit others to fight for him, who commanded his disciples to follow his example of nonviolence, who wept because his nation would not follow «the things that make for peace,» The apostolic church kept that memory alive, tried to follow that example and obey those commands.

Who are you to tell the other Christian she didn't actually hear his voice and follow his command to abort?

David discovered this principle and this was probably why God let him off the hook and did not have him stoned to death for adultery and murder like the law required: because David was humble and repented (even though Achan and plenty of other people repented and God still punished them, and this has nothing to do with the fact that David was king and probably would not have commanded his own stoning to keep the law even though he wrote Psalm 119 which is all about how much he loved keeping every commandment in the law).

On the one hand, good works are not acceptable, but on the other, we are commanded to do good works.

Of course, if he did, in our culture, he would be a murderer, which would be breaking other Biblical commands.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

As for your other point; if someone does claim to be a Christian, and is rich, they are indeed commanded to give of their own money.

To understand other persons will require different sets of abilities depending on whether our objective is to be their friends, sell them something they don't really need, or command them in the heat of battle.

Other religions speak of loving enemies too, so I don't imagine you meant «an exclusively Christian command», do you?

So if God says do something and your pastor interprets other scripture to mean not to do what God commands you pastor is interpreting incorrectly and misleading you.

Your Bible commands that you witness to the world, but it also tells you that you don't stay where you are not welcome and it does not enjoin you to force your beliefs on others.

secondly he was not the only one in the church who was a «non believer» many others do not «believe» as well as myself and yet non of us saw a problem with something that was being done out of respect and unison for the majority not for just one person opinion, and last, no one ever said he «had» to pray the only command was to bow your head and stare at the ground counting how many toes you had for all we carried, do what you want if choose not to pray but just bow your head in uniformity not cry about it blow it up and change the way events happen — if you have and complaints or questions please FEEL FREE to contact me [email protected]

Deuteronomy 17 2 If a man or woman living among you in one of the towns the LORD gives you is found doing evil in the eyes of the LORD your God in violation of his covenant, 3 and contrary to my command has worshiped other gods, bowing down to them or to the sun or the moon or the stars of the sky, 4 and this has been brought to your attention, then you must investigate it thoroughly.

Didn't we hear alot of this after 9/11 But what are they gonna do with THE TEXT in their holy book commanding them to kill others?????? Will they remove it??

An atheist simply does not follow a religion, does not have a set of religion - oriented perceptual biases or delusions and does not necessarily have any text to «follow» that commands them to violate the secular rights of other Americans.

I agree that science does not proceed by irrefutable deductive logic; but whilst some scientific ideas are indeed provisional, others surely command certainty.