Sentences with phrase «does out of possession»

The Israeli, going back to his Celtic days, has always been defined by what he does driving forward rather than what he does out of possession.

Not exact matches

The White House said that President Trump's former bodyguard did nothing out of the ordinary when he took possession of the president's medical records.

I don't know to what extent he gives authority to the various religious acolytes to deal with demonic possession, but it's not out of the question.

Don't boast about your possessions or your achievements — there's bound to be a Freudian in the room who'll point out that you are displacing your desire for something more significant in the way of bodily attributes or fulfilling relationships.

«In the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of were within its competence, the court found that they did not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the convention or its protocols.»

That didn't pan out either, so they switched to the possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Robinson blistered the European scholars who had had possession of the so - called Jung Codex from Nag Hammadi (smuggled out of Egypt by an antiquities dealer) since 1952 but did not publish the last of five text translations and commentaries until 1975.

When I was out of health or greatly fatigued, he did not awake me, but at such times I felt, even in my sleep, a singular possession of God.

i think some people have a short memory, not so long ago we would have lost these kind of games, do you remember the days when we had the lion, s share of possession and god knows how many chances to score without doing so everybody was giving out, yesterday everybody (including the players) knows we didn, t play well, had one chance and scored, we need to look at the bigger picture every team is going to have blips the season is a long one, look at liverpool they reminded me of us they drew a blank having missed loads of chances!

anything other than a fantastic on these 2 fronts I see as an excuse to explain away another failure and another choke up... so Wenger, kindly shove all that stats on possession etc where the sun don't shine, you are full of bs, just like the majority of the lottery winners we call out players... all talk and nothing else.....

I have said before yesterdays game that we need a top class forward and dm to challenge having watched yesterdays diabolical performance i feel we need to ad a out and out winger to the team playing ozil or carzola out left is not working pedro would have been a fantastic signing but looks like he is going to man u. I thought coq passing yesterday was terrible we need someone who can do both jobs sit in front of back 4 but when in possession have the quality to make things happen coq lacks the 2nd part by a long way.

Aw has lost the plot with his tactics as well.Teams read him and play us out of games.We only tend to play well when opponents give us room to play in the midfield — like Everton did.When opponents park the bus and cramp out Ozil and Sanchez, Wenger doesn't have a plan.All the possession and no goals wont win you games.

The team lacks confidence now, everyone is jittery and so prone to mistakes... strikers missing chances they will put away with their eyes close, defenders trying too hard not to make mistakes and then end up doing just that, the midfield does it best impression of «who can have moat possessions and do eff all with it», the manager is confused, jaded and out of ideas....

The last point, I said we are giving away too much possession, we lack intensity, can't press out of possession, we look clueless and don't know what to do without the ball.

Chicago scored on eight of its last 10 possessions, and they did so without going to the standard «clear out and let the star go to work» strategy.

Problem last night seemed to be that the midfield did not create space or make any kind of penetrating runs through the middle or out wide or even know where each other were or should be, resulting in sideways or backward possession with no threat going forwards.

Very good game for the team but I don't think Villa is the kind of team to measure our progress, they are the worst team in possession out of all the teams, their average possession for this season together with last season is about 28 %.

As for Pep, I agree, he's doing a Mourinho, getting the most out of a pretty much incredible team... I don't think he suits arsenal, I do nt like his character and I don't even like his playing style, where possession is valued over directness.

Out of form players include Ramsey (trying to be the worlds best player it seems, too many flick, wasting possession) Wilshere (too much dribbling and always wanting to do 1 - 2 everytime in opposition box) Ox (no 1 good game in 8 isn't good enough) Welbeck (not getting in goall scoring postion isn't wanting to make runs to receive passes) Cazorla (too many chances missed in last 5 games, alsmost all from the same position) Flamini (is not making enough tackles and isn't commanding the midfied) Mertesacker (Has lost positional awareness, reacting late to situations) Scszesny (can't make 3,4 or 5 good saves in a match, maximum is always 2) Monreal (although not really since he isn't a CB)

If you contrast his performance in the games where Arsenal had less possession, where he had to do the job of a true defensive midfielder, that is, chase the ball, close down the opposition, help his team play confidently from the back by coming out with the ball and taking on the one on one chase back toward his goal.

@brada — thanks.i thought i was insane, just thinking that thought of we missing giroud.you know arsenal believes in the fluid system of passing the ball and keeping possession but when we play a team that presses well and close down space, passing out from the back becomes difficult (for some reason, i du n no our passing has not been as fluid as the era of FAB, NASIRI, SONG ETC).

Aside from the poor transfers over 10 years, the complete lack of tactics, one dimensional football, being predictable, playing players out of position, playing players who should be benched, over playing players (ongoing injuries), not motivating the team, poor youth academy, bad formations set up for under - performing players and over reliance on tikka tikka possession football, no he hasn't done much wrong!

He pointed out that we had too many defensive midfielders wanting to bomb forward and leaving space behind for potential counter attack, and if you read between the lines and use it as a source of info for analysis, you can clearly see he is implying we need to be stronger in the midfield by not losing ball possession, pressing more when we don't have the ball and not let ourselves exposed.

But, rules being rules, the NFL's replay staff also needs to be certain that either contact with the ground knocked the ball out of James» possession, or that he didn't possess it when it touched the ground at the end.

Did you even notice how our midfielders were bullied once we regained possession and hence were unable to get out of their own half.

Whether draxler or not arsenal is still a weaker team, is it something bad if we have both draxler and Sanchez in the same team fighting for places, just imagine van persie, Sanchez, ozil, carzola are in the same team, with likes of inform konsieny, mustafi, and konlansinic, and good holding midfider,... our problem with this 343 information or 3421 information apart from Wenger playing players out of position we don't have a strong holdmidfider that retrieve the ball back when we lost possession... Kant's is perfect example of that, look at the job he does at Chelsea is amazing...... without a good holding midfielder our defenders are vulnerable

A recent game we were behind with that crazy defensive non sense and when one was replaced, we were find and more threat... When you attack, they don't and get confused, if you also keep possession as we do; the game is over if we attack insread of opposite and be scared, shakky all game long with players lost in the pitch out of position... That's totally crazy!

My suggestion is that if Sanchez can learn that, he has the potential to do it much better than giroud does because he is faster off the mark and can dribble.he's too honest in his running so I disagree with those that think it's the set up of the team that failed him.his movement is still a little naive for the premier league Secondly on the left wide argument.Wenger is jamming attacking midfielder out there so as to provide cover for the defensive midfielder using two box to box battlers.it only makes sense because we have lots of them and it can be effective if well mastered.the catch is sacrificing a winger for the the attacking midfielder.if your memory serves you well you'll remember that artetas downward spiral began when teams noticed he was the hub for our possession and started deploying their number 10 to press him.it's been working for ages and can be used on any defensive midfielder regardless of the size so You'll end up with your much cried for cavarlho, kedihra, bender, schneiderline, and every other one passing sideways and backward because of the pressure so I personally appreciate the innovative move but Again appeal to Ramsey and Wilshire to take their job more serious.

But Arsene will see our possession stats, along with accurate passes and the number of efforts on goal, and think we are doing ok so it must be something that's out of our control.

When you have an out for a pass whether it is a goal kick or just a lob downfield and we have a real good chance of retaining possession then that players does provide an immense contribution.

Just as many had suggested when the transfer news broke it was the difference in styles of football between the Gunners and what brings the best out of Vardy for the Foxes that was the problem, and his fears were probably not helped by England's Euro 2016 in which Hodgson did not start him and then played him out wide as England dominated possession but struggled to score.

This idea a DM doesn't need ball - playing skills is complete and utter nonsense, a starting DM for Arsenal needs to be excellent out of possession when we have the ball, and great with the ball at his feet.

He seems to sacrifice some early possessions in the name of figuring out what he can get away with later on, and when it is time to hit the accelerator, Oregon does it with panache.

I can remember as a child my father taking my to see Stoke City who always out sang the away teams and the passion flowed through to their players, what's happend to Arsenal, what was the quote from Roy Keane Our club is in a downfall last nights Ossian average Gibbs - plays like a winger bel - looked out of his depth Mert NOT GOOD ENOUGH Kos can't play both Cb on his own Le coq found wanting in possession Welbeck 4th choice Utd plays ever week for us, says it all Sanchez poor last night tries to do too much Santii - felt sorry for him, tried, kept getting pulled back and no movement in front of him Ozil 1/2 things either he doesn't suit the premier or doesn't suit wenger approach GIroud not good enough no where near stevie wonder could see that And finally wenger 10 years ago ahead of his time, now NO PASSION, NO TACTICS, NO FEAR FACTOR, = no job

Should point out that Australia did of course use an entirely different ball when they had control of possession!

33 attempts at goal 75 % possession and lose comfortably it can only happen to arsenal it would be funny if not so tragic and I'm for one not buying the reason we lost is because of De Gea it's as much poor finishing as it is great goal keeping more aggression with the chances and you score I don't care who's in goal just smash it doesn't have to look pretty and I don't have to say very much about the defending it's schoolboy stuff all this talk about koscielny (bosscielny) never got that isn't physical enough to be an Adams or Campbell gets muscled off the ball far too often he's a good player don't get me wrong but he ain't world class and definitely isn't a leader I'd replace that whole back line and drop xhaka and ramsey for new signings yeah ramsey set up a nice goal but that kid can not hit water if he fell out of a boat his shooting is awful always sky's them very frustrating player.

Thus, if Arsenal do play their possession - based Football, and guard against pacey counter-attacks from Martinez's side, the game could become an atritional one, with both sides working out each other and attaining parity at the end of 90 minutes.

City had the possession advantage, but in terms of pure effectiveness they weren't within miles of Liverpool in the first half, perhaps best exemplified by the fact they didn't manage a single shot on target in the first half out of the three they took, while Liverpool managed four on frame and scored on three of them.

I don't care who you are, you can't man mark Messi and taking three players out of the game for marking duties would be suicide against a team like Barcelona who rely on possession.

Remember the ex players: Pat Rice — had to be a total YES man; Steve Bould — very successful in coaching the team when out of possession... Wenger did not like Bould's approval ratings and told him to cease;» Martin Keown — brilliant defensive results but then he left... let's guess why.

And for those who are constantly bashing him about his lack of impact in games, maybe you should watch the Newcastle game again and see how much impact a player like Ozil would have had, a player who can keep possession, drag opposition players out of position and requires constant attention from the opposition to stop him from delivering that one killer pass even if he seems to be having a bad game [I recall Ronaldinho had a relatively quiet game in the 2006 champions league final game, he did just one thing all game, he delivered that pass to Eto'o that got Lehmann sent off, he wasn't huffing and puffing for 90 minutes].

At times he tries to do too much, gets caught in possession or finds himself inexplicably out of position.

It goes like this: (1) we can't seem to carry possession into the O - zone, (2) so we dump and chase, (3) and then we have to go spend significant effort along the boards, (4) to try to get the puck back under possession in what is a 50/50 crapshoot, (5) and when we do repossess, (6) we have to re-organize to get a quality O - zone shot chance, (7) but we are tired because we just spent 50 - 60 % of our time working our asses off along the boards, (8) just to try to get the puck back and have a chance, (9) which said lack of energy results in actual lower quality chances (and maybe fewer penalties drawn and more penalties taken) and (10) we go back to the bench deflated because it seems like we are working really hard and getting nothing out of it.

There are many things he has done really well in the last couple of games and throughout this season — that composure, calmness, level - headedness, strong aerially, concentration, winning the ball back and passing to team mates that exudes calm under heavy pressure, anticipating danger and cutting them out in advance, not giving away possession cheaply that may have cost the team, seeing good opportunities to quickly release team mates in forward positions from the back line, etc..

We are a team that likes possession and likes to dictate the tempo of the game but we are also a team that scores all types of goals and at no point in the game did we look like a team that had run out of offensive ideas to trouble Chelsea.

As I was watching I was trying to work out what had gone so wrong with those two, the only idea I could come up with was that although in training the energy of Sanchez and his determination to defend from the front has clearly rubbed off; they track back with greater determination, the problem is they also seem to both be copying the man from Chile's unnecessary obsession of trying to beat at least two opponents before making his pass, Sanchez can get away with this — just — but it is downright infuriating when Walcott and Oxlade - Chamberlain try and do the same as neither of them has Sanchez» close control; nothing like it in fact, the result is that we lose possession so easily and so unnecessarily which gifts attacking opportunities to the opposition.

As the great Liverpool sides of the 1970s and 1980s discovered, success in two - legged European ties often requires a different kind of football, and the ability to retain possession and close out a game, something that Tottenham's high - energy style does not easily accommodate.

On this night, however, not only did Barcelona repeatedly kick possession out of defence, they failed to even try to play their trademark «to me - to - you - to - me - to you» passing across the backline.

Sanchez definitely did not seem his normal self as he was wasteful in possession and looked rather out of sorts being uninspired by his team - mates.

Against Hull City he'd looked like a blockage in the hole denying the Armenian space to come inside, whereas in the City match, Rooney seemed keener to vacate the space as he roamed deeper, even if the former Borussia Dortmund attacker was too out - of - sorts to see the benefit, clumsily losing possession and failing to make any real impact on the game — not something the United skipper struggled to do.