Sentences with phrase «does present some interesting»

Investing in student loans isn't necessarily the first place you'd think to look for investment opportunities, but it does present some interesting options for those comfortable with this risk.

While the Cardinals do present some interesting challenges, especially on the defensive side of the ball, the Bears want this one more.

It's somewhat distasteful to analyse that fact politically, but his return does present some interesting conundrums for Gordon Brown.

Investing in student loans isn't necessarily the first place you'd think to look for investment opportunities, but it does present some interesting options for those comfortable with this risk.

While they have yet to be confirmed, they do present an interesting direction for Microsoft toward a single - player focused RPG.

While it won't solve the problems of unsustainable fisheries worldwide (we as consumers could help by making some informed choices to eat less fish or to go vegetarian altogether), this project does present some interesting reuse ideas for something that usually thrown away.

The case has not been decided at the time this blog was written, but it does present an interesting legal question.

Not exact matches

Stephens is interested to see what Loblaw will do with the pharmacies already present in some of its stores, suggesting that they will perhaps become «Shoppers kiosks» or «Shoppers Lite,» in Loblaw store locations that don't already have a Shoppers close by.

Be prepared to present some of the best work you've done and share interesting experiences that you've had with other clients.

He adds, «They did not seem interested in solving the problem of the present — which we told them was much bigger.»

Definitely an interesting article which presented data I did not expect to find.

It's maybe one reason why people are so easily misled into climate change denial when there don't seem to be any definitive and reliable sources of data that are open to the public where information is presented in various different ways that most ordinary people are interested in.

We offer you complete objectivity because we have no affiliations or financial arrangements with third parties that might distort our objectivity or present conflicts of interest, nor do we sell mutual funds, insurance or other products.

Although bonds generally present less short - term risk and volatility than stocks, bonds do contain interest rate risk (as interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa) and the risk of default, or the risk that an issuer will be unable to make income or principal payments.

People don't really want to learn about supply and demand, even if it is presented in an interesting way (like this episode).

According to the policy statement, the central bank indicated that interest rates will continue to remain at present levels for an extended period of time, although they did not mention what the specific timeframe would be.

Crowdfunding platforms as interesting and useful as they are, do however present risks because there is no guarantee campaign supporters will get their funds back if and when things go wrong.

Also, don't be afraid of presenting visually interesting slides.

It's all about making the story interesting and the workload minimal, and a good press release should present all the necessary info in a way that does just that.

This thread is exceedingly more interesting than the usual»»cause god did it» spew presented on this blog by the likes of Chad, George, et al..

Space is Empty: In ancient times it was variously believed that the earth sat on a large animal or a giant, or even that a mythical Atlas supported the pillars that held heaven and earth apart, and / or carried the earth around on his shoulders (Where he stood while doing so presents an interesting conundrum).

You don't present the facts in a way that allows a person to reason out for themselves if they are interested, you just hit them over the head with your opinion.

The Democrats» present failure stems from their presumption that on economic issues they win by default, that non-wealthy voters know their own material interests» those historically opposed or left unaddressed by Republicans» and do not require instruction or reminding as to which party is on their side.

In a study of his earlier pictures, Kolker notes that «Scorsese is interested in the psychological manifestations of individuals who are representative either of a class or of a certain ideological grouping; he is concerned with their relationship to each other or to an antagonistic environment... [and finally] there is no triumph for his characters» (A Cinema of Loneliness [Oxford University Press, 19881, p. 162) The Jesus of the Last Temptation fits this pattern (as do Travis Bickel in Taxi Driver, Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull and Paul Hackett in After Hours) By eschewing any reference to a resurrection — and, in an interesting theological note, allowing Paul to suggest that his preaching of the risen Christ is more important than the Jesus of history — Scorsese presents the crucifixion as the final willful act of a man driven by a God who makes strange demands on his followers.

However, the use of personal and impersonal models within the Hindu tradition, or within the Christian tradition, does seem to present some interesting parallels with complementarity in physics, which we must now examine further.

This «twist» bespoke desperation on the part of the writers — who, having failed to make her character interesting in the present tense, sought to do it retrospectively.

Whether Christians ought to have agreed to that contract is an interesting historical and theological question, but not really of much significance in our present circumstances» for agree to it Christians did.

Interpreters are never interest free but always present reality in partisan ways and, indeed, can not do otherwise.

I work for the government, there are many things I can't do financially because they could present a «conflict of interest».

Sometime in the middle of history you want to say these things were presented to people and they just said something like, «Oh, interesting, no one ever told us before, but if you say this is what happened, then we will all do it?»

Then do we always give equal weight to our distant future experiences and to our present ones in terms of this calculus of self - interest?

They were nonpolitical, not in the sense of segregation from political life and interests, as the signs of a purely «spiritual» change in the world, say in human hearts, but in the sense of total supernaturalism: the whole present world order, with its politics and its oppression, its hunger and its hatred, was to be completely done away.

When then these policies misfired, as they did not only in Indochina, the lack of interest in helping, poor countries reached its present state.

While I agree that she doesn't present all sides, it is an interesting take from a theologian's perspective.

The utility of Chambers for the Brownsville group was equally related to self - interest, «We didn't know anything except that nothing was to be expected in solving our problems from anybody but ourselves,» one who was present remembers,» and Chambers was just the man to tell us how much it was going to cost.»

Also, this blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.

The present study was primarily interested in assessing consumers» ability to use a variety of front - of - pack labelling systems; therefore participants did not have access to other information that might also be used when selecting foods.

The minutes of any Audit and Risk Committee meeting where a conflict of interest has been disclosed shall reflect that the conflict of interest was disclosed and that the interested person was not present for deliberations and did not vote on the matter.

The reason the wilderness bill is being opposed by several special - interest groups is that they realize how poorly protected the wilderness areas are at present and they do not want to see this changed.

On a side note, I couldn't help but think 2 predominant thoughts when watching the game against Bournemouth on the weekend: (1) Wenger is still willing to put his own personal agenda ahead of the team's best interests when it comes to team selection, which luckily for us didn't cost us the 3 points this time and (2) if Eddie Howe is earmarked to be the successor we are in deep trouble because he's simply a poor man's version of our present manager, as he's tactically inept and has an even worse road record.

Just analyze Wenger's statement today, «I didn't come out against Benzema», its not the same as saying that I did not show or I don't have any interest in Benzema, and to top it off when ask about ruling out any future purchases (this within the context of an additional striker) Arsene pointed out what he currently has at his disposal and think they are sufficient, while adding that if an opportunity to strengthen presents itself, he would not be adverse to pursue it; this seems a bit contradictory and points to someone who is being a bit evasive.

Last but not least, Man United are said to be looking to hijack our move for Morgan Schneiderlin, although in reality, we don't appear all that interested at present.

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

I believe I did present somewhat of a solution in saying that nothing elaborate is necessary, just a quick hitting piece that covers the basics that sheds some light to the rest of the readers here on the impact of their commitments, and provides interesting discussion in the dark hours of the off season.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

What I find interesting is that the discussion of opening up the marriage — what we present as a viable option in The New I Do — was quickly rejected: «I knew that he couldn't handle it if I actually said, «I want to see other people,»» one woman says.

The whole flash card culture seems designed to make parents feel guilty and kids feel pressured, and doesn't seem to be resulting in more productive, connected, interesting people than we had back when it was enough just to be present with your children when they needed you and to interact with them throughout the day.

Rather than forcing it, I work on finding other activities he is interested in and focus on being present with him in whatever it is we end up doing.

Do not present acquisition of basic skills as being for personal development or interest.

IBFAN and its member groups do not accept funding or have any commercial links with manufacturers or distributors of breast pumps as these present conflicts of interest, whether or not the marketing practices violate the International Code.