The theory of temperature driven by CO2
does produce a Hockey Stick Temperature.
Not exact matches
What is red noise (in simple terms please)
Does it always
produce a
hockey stick for every run with red noise, or for only some?
Do click through to look at the various «replications» and «confirmations» of Mann's
hockey stick, and note the differences between Mann's own
sticks and what he
produces «when he has to work with competent scientists who can check his work» (see the «consensus»
hockey stick above).
Various dubious techniques were used to promote this idea, such as the infamoous «
hockey -
stick» graph
produced by Michael Mann in which proxy temperature series that
did not support the narrative were truncated.
Basically the climatologists who have
produced hockey stick shaped graphs have
done so by carefully selecting proxies that
produce the results they want.
It is the erroneous interpretation of what IS Kinetic Energy that still «dogs greenhouse rhetoric» and makes concentration on, and opinionation involving of, Temperature (including the «
hockey stick») poorly correlated on «climate alteration» as these generally involving of «greenhouse warming»
do NOT notice the lag
produced from Turbulent Cooling in its reversion actually releasing «stored» Kinetic Energy.
Current GCM models may have realistic - seeming weather patterns, but are totally incapable of
producing phenomena that look like the Holocene (Little Ice Age, Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Holocene Optimum, the steady decline of temperature on average over the last 3,000 years, etc.) The Climate Science community has, instead, taken the path of trying to claim that these swings didn't occur (Michael Mann's «
Hockey Stick», etc.) This
does not give me a lot of confidence in the rest of their «science».
It's nearly impossible to figure out what McIntyre actually *
did * because he seems to keep changing his tune:-\ We may never know exactly how the red noise was generated that
produced those
hockey sticks.
64) Michael Mann of Penn State University has actually shown that the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age
did in fact exist, which contrasts with his earlier work which
produced the «
hockey stick graph» which showed a constant temperature over the past thousand years or so followed by a recent dramatic upturn.
I've even
produced a dendro reconstruction which shows a
hockey stick (and I'm not one of the «
hockey team» and I didn't use strip - bark pines).
But Steve it surely
does confirm Mann's
Hockey Stick since it has found yet another way (using non-dendro proxies) to
produce a sudden warming using statistical slight - of - hand that Mann would be proud of.
which is that Briffa's RCS
produced a
hockey stick whereas the RCS
did not.
Can someone point me to the answer about whether or not the algorithm computing the
hockey stick in the IPCC third report actually
does produce that shape with random red - noise, as claimed by McKitrick / McIntyre — ie something that makes the case on that without resorting to character assasination?