Sentences with phrase «does see the world around»

As Polke declared in 1965: «You can believe me or not: but I really do see the world around me in dots.»

That means that this device sees the world in a different way compared to your average smartphone, and that's to say, it actually does see the world around you.

Not exact matches

Sorrell then referenced a speech given by WPP's third biggest client — and the biggest ad spender in the world — P&G's marketing boss Marc Pritchard, who said Google and Facebook were not doing enough to meet advertiser demands around measurement, brand safety, and viewability (the measure of whether an online ad had the ability to be seen by a human).

Walking around Disney world, there's a lot of branding with the iconic characters but what you don't see a lot of is the actual Disney logo.

Matt Turner: You guys have over $ 1 trillion in assets, with offices in 16 countries, so I wanted to first ask, when you look around the world, what do you see?

«This is something we haven't seen in a while in terms of the growth backdrop» both in the US and around the world, he said, adding that European economies «are doing really well» after years of crisis conditions.

«When you look around the world, you don't see assets are grossly overpriced and you don't see assets that are grossly underpriced.»

But I don't think people around the world should expect to see this kind of thing from Coca - Cola.»

But I was just amazed by how everyone, young and old wanted to be involved... and was so deeply enriched and touched by the experience and the laughter and the love I experienced from the people I met and how women would in particular open their hearts to me and tell me the stories of where they've come from, particularly because I have the language and was coming there as a woman and just how touched they were that I was there as a woman from England who's learned the language and who's an artist and running this project and come all the way to see them so they didn't feel forgotten I think that was pretty much what they felt... that their stories were being heard so they don't feel forgotten knowing the tents would be around the world.

The regular report is the most accurate measure and comparison of wireless carriers around the world, which is probably why the Canadian industry and its allies don't want the public to see it.

Zipcar's services are typically offered large cities around the world, with high populations of millennials who either can't afford a car, or don't see the need to own one in the city.

And what do you see in that chart is that starting around in the 70s these two lines are pretty close together, but after 1971 when the world was removed from the gold standard, the trajectory of the deadline was almost parabolic and just keep going up and up and up.

«He was part of my conversion story of seeing that the world isn't as it should be — and there are limitations to what I can do — but through Jesus, change for me and for others around me is possible.

simply saying «look around and see the world» doesn't cut it

I believe that its important to see inner wisdom and the council of friends and wise and knowledgeable people... but God, if he / she exists created us — right... oh yes w / brains... we should be honoring that by using them... I can imagine if God exists every day he is saying to himself / herself «why do people keep asking me for things I have not control over, or really could care less about (people are asking for a new shinny house to replace their perfectly fine house while millions are homeless around the world, hungry, sick, etc.)... why are they not using the gifts and skills they have».

Put a Mosque at Ground Zero and I don't care WHAT your intentions are, Muslims around the world will see it as a holy site and a victory against the Christian Infidels.

Did they see around the world what they moslem people did, learn from the past so many terrorism attack in uDid they see around the world what they moslem people did, learn from the past so many terrorism attack in udid, learn from the past so many terrorism attack in usa.

What this man just did is true hate... though the world sees it the other way around.

For instance, when these characteristics are perceived as exhibited in an individual enduringly and in a sense in which these are understood to affect the world around in a favorable fashion — either in an objective sense of effecting something concrete outside such a person [like effecting healing, foretelling, acting as medium in a non-rational manner or simply doing good or saying good to help the people selflessly], exhibiting personal traits, conditions and states which are known to be «abnormal» [like going into trances, hearing voices, seeing visions, or just the simple unconventional behavior, which proceed from such an individual's horizon to affect, influence, impact others» horizons]-- or is subjectively perceived to be extra-ordinary — such an individual is said to be godly, god - bearing, pious or saintly.

Jesus would do the following (in the U.S.A.): medicare for all, legalize all drugs, legalize gay marriage, destroy the wall between the U.S.A. and Mexico and consequently give the U.S. border patrol agents something useful and productive to do, end U.S. military aggression around the world, direct election of U.S. presidents, the national initiative for democracy, urge Christians to be more productive on Sundays instead of seeing who can wear the nicest clothes to church.

I do not see anyone throwing roses at him or calling him a hero as happens too often in other places around the world, such as Pakistan.

All around the world, people are beginning to see that it is possible (and maybe even easier) to follow Jesus outside the four walls of the church and do so in a way that takes His love to the neediest people in our towns and cities.

I see in my work place and around the world non Christians being lead by The Spirit to do His work ALL the time.

PS - Much of the wars around the world are more about control of natural resources and have nothing to do with religion but you see, you can not get someone to kill in the name of diamonds, or oil, or access to natural gas and other natural resources.

No, but when we read the newspaper, when we see the concerns of the world around us, responding with the heart of Jesus is the right thing to do.

@honestanon Just a quick one here but if you do a bit of research you will see many clashes at Gurdwaras around the World and a great number of them are from good, honest hard - working Sikhs who see that a few individuals with an extremist viewpoint try to make their way in to our Gurdwaras, gain trust and then later show their true colors by trying to implement their extremist views.

I think if people looked around, they would have seen that a lot of ethnic minorities who were believers were struggling, and if you didn't have friends in those worlds, you wouldn't realize it was an epidemic.

In his early research into the child's world - view, Piaget showed that the thing - concept, as Whitehead criticized it, actually appears rather late in a child's development and represents an abstraction from earlier and more concrete perceptions (RME) Not until around ten years of age does the child come to see «things» in reality in the way the adult sees «things» in reality and uses the thing - concept consciously, that is argumentatively.

When I honestly looked at the evidence of my life, my relationships, my internal condition [how I walked around experiencing the world], I saw that perhaps I was wrong, at least didn't have all the answers.

Look around you and see what religion has done around the world.

Why don't you check out Bethel church in Redding, CA and many others around the nation and the world to see the Jesus power in us as a Christian.

Buster People all around the world have experienced near death events... of all regions and non-believers... over all those people do not have the same experience but those that are religious see the after life in terms of their religion, but all have a spiritual experience that changes them... What I am curious is do these prove that Christians are correct..

And nowhere do I recall seeing anyone claim Obama would bring «peace around the world».

Then we turned around and saw it was a big, mean world out there, and we didn't belong in it anymore.

I find it extremely silly that many people posting on this automatically connect the following: Lent = Catholics = Pedophelia = Connection with church and God = Stupid blind people who don't see the world around them = God is a lie (in any forms)... which leads to John Lennon's saying «All we need is Love» to be washed down the drain.

While the leading experts around the world — with well - funded, never - ending resources at hand — were trying (and dramatically failing) to become the first to fly, it was these two bicycle mechanics who didn't have a college education, who saw each new problem standing in their way of flight as one amazing step closer to solving the problem.

However, for those of us who live in the real world and around Mormans, see how they act and still do the say things and although they say they don't do these things... it's still amazing how you can still find them doing the very same things and it is still ok... and you really didn't see what you just saw!

I really do hope to see more of these amazing wines ending up on wine lists around the world.

It's something that draws people from all around the world, as you'll see if you do a Delicate Arch hike in August and notice that only half of the people there are speaking English.

I've done it a couple of times and it's great to see all these recipe variations around the world.

Interviewed for a wine podcast a few weeks later, she told her critics, «I am just flabbergasted that you don't see what is going on in the world around you.»

See what food manufacturers are doing around the world in a way you never thought possible.

You see, John's awesome because he doesn't just sit around waiting on the world to change, he makes things happen with the power of his thumbs, a little keyboard and this thing called Twitter.

If you watch fans opinions from around the world, you'd see Wenger is done.

I do agree with you he does not have the world best strikers around and arsenal would show some serious intent by signing Mahrez and Lacazette, or Augbuyeang and Isco, but in those scenario, isco and Mahrez are seen as replacement for ozil, laca is over rated but i would take him and AB would my choice for striker.

4) yes Keita: he's got a release clause that get's activated next year it's around 45 mil if I remember correctly, i highly rate him as the all rounder Dm / Cm / Am does it all and can fill the cazorla void instantly, for anyone that are reading the 70 - 80 million valuation I don't see any team paying that, but making him the most expensive African player will sure tempt him to move Bid 45 mil with add ons and there is a big chance of getting him, if they don't accept that offer to make a red bull commercial that should boost the sales of that terrible tasting energy drink, Sanchez Ozil Ramsey ox bellerin wenger it's time to get drinkng that's Just good marketing for redbull, a team with no history or fans shouldn't have a say in who to keep in the first place they are a stepping stone to bigger things and we are the team to make you world class, wan na eventually play in barca or real look at our track record we will get you there!!

How do you think those fans feel that travel around the world to see each and every game?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Gerd Müller also did not run around the field all over the place and defend on his goal line, but he was one of the most lethal strikers the world has seen.

Alan, do your self a favour, go out on a football side where all the fans around the world do visit and then make your claim about your football openiouns and see how the football world reacts to you.