Sentences with phrase «does support this study»

The ice core data for the past 800k years does support this study.

Simon and Mark: «The question is, does the supporting study information meet the criteria.

Not exact matches

«You don't have to be the life of the party, but this study supports the theory that maintaining strong social networks seems to be linked to slower cognitive decline,» study author Emily Rogalski commented in the study release.

What it does: Provides support services for Mexican and Brazilian students studying in Canada

The findings, he adds, do not negate a previous Conference Board study that found no evidence to support views that corporate Canada was being dangerously gutted.

That study doesn't support some of the wilder stories told during the last NDP reign, that scores of businesses left the province and the economy fell into a crevasse.

According to a recent study conducted by Harvard University, which polled young adults between the ages of 18 and 29, not so good: 51 percent of survey respondents said they do not support capitalism, and only 42 percent were in favor of it.

«A study published last year in Experimental Brain Research appeared to provide some partial scientific support for this idea,» notes BPS, explaining that brain scans of experienced long - distance runners revealed running really does seem to reduce activity in certain key brain areas.

The Facebook - commissioned study Zuckerberg referenced had massive problems, including a non-representative sample, a non-reviewable proprietary data set (thus making the study non-reviewable), and beyond that, the study's results actually did support the idea of filter bubbles.2

The pullback in government support was often justified by the idea that employee stock ownership may be a risky substitute for fixed worker pay, but almost all the studies indicate that employee stock ownership in the form of ESOPs does not come at the expense of workers taking lower wages or other forms of compensation.

Forms of exegesis or biblical interpretation that do not support the homiletic, evangelical, and educational missions of the Church may have their place in the academy, but they are subsets of religious studies, not theology.

I learned this not from a class in feminist studies, but from Jesus — who was brought into the world by a woman whose obedience changed everything; who revealed his identity to a scorned woman at a well; who defended Mary of Bethany as his true disciple, even though women were prohibited from studying under rabbis at the time; who obeyed his mother; who refused to condemn the woman caught in adultery to death; who looked to women for financial and moral support, even after the male disciples abandoned him; who said of the woman who anointed his feet with perfume that «wherever this gospel is preached throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her»; who bantered with a Syrophoenician woman, talked theology with a Samaritan woman, and healed a bleeding woman; who appeared first before women after his resurrection, despite the fact that their culture deemed them unreliable witnesses; who charged Mary Magdalene with the great responsibility of announcing the start of a new creation, of becoming the Apostle to the Apostles.

But as I've already stated, a knowledge of ancient Middle Eastern culture plus a study of the Hebrew text itself does not support that interpretation.

How about a study, that religious Americans are more likely to support a war or blame all troubles on God, rather than themselves... You believe or don't all you want, but please stop misleading people, with worthless studies and instead put more energy and resources to help those in need...

If you do find a passage that seems to support the church practice in question, you need to do some serious Bible study to make sure it really says what you think it says, and you're not just using it as a proof text.

My study also says that if your support any of the organized religions then you support the murders that have been done in their name.

Though my job performance was faultless, and not a single one of the doctrines I was studying had anything to do with the doctrinal statement of the organization, the founder thought that if donors heard that I was studying these doctrines, support for the organization would decrease.

One of the studies we need is a biblical analysis of «rebellious» generations... seems like Barna has us all thinking a «lost» generation is the previous generation's fault... the Bible doesn't support that at all.

By affirming the importance of surrounding and supporting communities to poor children and children whose home life is in disarray, the Kauai study challenges us to reflect on what might be done to shore up, or at least to avoid damaging, these structures.

By the beginning of the 19th century, however, natural philosophy had given way to the natural sciences and a new understanding of critical reason emerged, one that did not so easily support the faith and piety that undergirded studies in divinity.

One side effect of the research I've done in writing the book, is that when somebody presents 10K verses to support their claim, I can write a short reply: «Thank you for providing so much scriptural support that conclusively proves my position, and demonstrates that your position has no basis in scripture», and, if challenged, go through each cited verse, and, using one or more specific techniques / methods of Bible study, show how the cited verse either refutes the position they present, or supports the position I present.

Does it have any validity, not really and sighting that study is showing the fact that there is no new studies that support gay lifestyle.

One study from the University of Colorado found that 88 percent of America criminologists did not believe that the death penalty was an effective deterrent, and 91 percent believe politicians support the death penalty merely as a way to appear tough on crime.

The fact that Atwill had neither scholarly credentials (he's a retired computer programmer) nor a jot of support from any academic in historical studies didn't seem to matter.

However, through my experiences at Strathclyde University's Catholic Chaplaincy, I have found that not only do these young people rely on books and endless hours of studying in order to pass their exams, but increasingly they also look for spiritual support.

If this does turn out to be the case, we will want to examine the possibility that the more comprehensive scope of Whitehead's thought may serve an important interpretative and supporting role for Deutsch's investigations of political life, which, in turn, may supply Whiteheadian studies with a focus for distinctly political problems.

That this kind of study and conversation should continue is absolutely brilliant and just because it doesn't support your own view does not mean it should be diminished or ridiculed.

Paradoxically, the hundreds of studies done in the past decade have apparently served to support diametrically opposing conclusions.

I'm simply pointing out that there are other studies and other science out there that does not support an all plant based diet as «The way».

«The study is contrary to the large bank of evidence that supports consumers of 100 % fruit juice have a better diet quality than people who don't consume fruit juice.

This is supported by the results of a 2013 Mintel study that revealed 23 % of adults had ordered more, healthier fast food menu items in 2013 compared to 2012, with younger adults aged 18 - 34 having the greater tendency to do so.

Research studies do not support this point of view.

Giroud does not deserve to lead the arsenal line next season.He should be replaced do u know why?It is because he is always going to miss a lot of chances and will cost us.people who support him to lead the line have not studied his game clearly.every season he will continue to cost us.But at least i wont say he is useless or something.He is on the pitch and gives his all so he is useful.He is not clinical and not good at all.He is a striker who is just above average but sometimes even performs below average in his 3 years over here.Be honest and say it as it is.Some people use stats to constantly defend him yet if you watch him you will be shocked.Walcott can lead the line he has everything to.but as i said he lacks the aggressiveness and physique to be the main man.that will go against him so many times.so its better for him to remain on the wings.Giroud does not deserve it.We all know that.

Not only do the centres provide much needed care, support and necessities such as clothing, they provide the boys a start in life through paying for their school education or their study for a trade at local colleges.

The only studies that could support such a ban would entail comparison of equivalent groups that did and did not head.

However, evidence that overall fathers can (and often do) «buffer» their children against the worst effects of their mothers» depression is found from a study that measured what happened when the fathers didn't provide support:

Some studies support the idea that this strategy is effective and doesn't cause long - lasting mental damage to babies.

«Students» Needs, Teachers» Support, and Motivation for Doing Homework: A Cross-Sectional Study.»

Well here is one study that supports what Ina is doing.

Yet, my personal approach to parenting is a mix that goes well beyond the bits and pieces of these books that I found helpful — among the bits and pieces that I feel don't apply to my family but certainly they may apply to another family — and include bits and pieces of how I was raised, the lessons learned reflecting on years of parenting already behind me, thoughts from friends and family members, my instincts, the reality of unavoidable challenges, scientific studies, blogs and websites, parenting classes and support groups, teleseminars, conferences, and so much more.

Don't Start Too Early «The idea that parents should hurry reading, spelling, writing, or math ahead of children's normal development is not supported by a single replicable research study in the world or by any clinical experience in history...» - so read this to find out what you should do, when and how to stardo, when and how to start.

It says small babies do not have the ability to support their heads and this study shows being upright in a seat is a risky position for a long period of time.

This study does NOT support the safety of homebirth with an American homebirth midwife (CPM).

Studies support that your milk production does not decrease, your milk composition does not change (or if there are changes it does not affect your babies willingness to breastfeed) and is healthier for the mum (of course)!

If multiple strong, well - done studies came out and showed that home birth under a specific set of circumstances was exactly as safe as a hospital birth, you would see people here change their minds and support that.

The PROBIT study (which is as close to an RCT as we'll ever get on the subject) doesn't support the idea that BF prevents obesity: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1667089

Unfortunately, the ACOG, the American College of OB - GYN does not endorse or support home births because their studies show that there is a higher incidence of potential harm to the baby in home birth.

The authors state that «if you don't rush it, potty training will actually take less time in the long run» and «even if you do manage to potty train your son early in his second year, he's then more likely to have a setback... than if you'd waited...» but they do not have any evidence or cite any studies to support these statements.

Then, I did some reading and reviewed studies looking at breastfeeding and ear infections and found supporting evidence to suggest that breastfeeding was actually a protective factor.

If the study doesn't support homebirth it's because ACOG the obstetrician's trade union and «Dr» Amy somehow rigged it.....