Sentences with phrase «does win a ball in the air»

When he does win a ball in the air it usually when it is directed straight at him.

Not exact matches

Per reads the game spectacularly well, probably better than anyone we have, but one slight misjudgement and he can not recover and is out of the game, I also feel he should be more potent in the air, whenever he loses an aerial ball I get so frustrated, he should be winning any crosses into our box, and should also cause havoc from corners, but he does not.

I still don't see how he is a super sub.He's labelled as a super sub just because of this season.Those matches when he scored he was supposed to be played because we needed an aerial presence.A lot of those matches had he started we could've won because we needed aerial presence.But the thing is that his abilities don't suit him as a super sub.I mean he holds up the ball well and is great in the air and that's just about it.He's actually the one one who needs service and who needs players around him to open up defences for him to receive the pass and not vice versa.Super subs actually provide they are not the one's to be provided for.In Giroud's case he was supposed to start in those in matches as Sanchez was not up to the task in aerial battles.Giroud will not be able to affect a match if the opponents are as good in the air.

What a lot of fans don't understand is that no one can win balls in the air with back to goal that Olivier can.

walcot was good yesterday... but he needs to do more he is taller than sanchez but sanchez can win the ball in the air more than theo does..

He is supposed to make tackles, to win the ball in the air and to anticipate attacks and provide cover for his colleagues.He is unable to do any of this because he is uncoordinated and lacks basic mobility.

I'm sure I» am wasting my time trying to get you folk to actually «watch «his game.Basically a defender who doesn't know how to defend, unable to read the game, hopeless at set pieces and only wins the ball in the air when it is directed straight at him.

Generally a static No9 who wins balls in the air but does relatively little with them.

Ozil when u get dispossessed don't throw your hands in the air and look at the ref every time, just try - at least to win the ball back, that way u get haters off your back and your confidence remains in tact for the full 90....

All giroud seems to be interested in is doing first time gay little flicks that half the time do nt come off instead of actually doing his job of winning the ball in the air and holding the ball up properly which benteke done brilliantly yesterday

For example, we allow stoke to play we did not close them down effectively and effeciently that allow them to have almost 50 % possession in the entire match, Stoke is very good at winning long ball in the air but yet still rather than play from the back Ospina kick most ball long, this allow Stoke a foothold in the game.

no but it would be nice to add a little size and strength against chelsea in the middle of the park i would put diarby in there with flamini the super shrimp can do the dog fights and diarby can take a few balls in the air and win some shoulder to shoulder battles also throw in a few dhalsim leg kicks!!!

Calvert - Lewin's ability to win balls in the air and also chase down long balls has made him a good outlet for Everton, however he doesn't currently possess the quality on the ball to make him a game - changer for Everton with such little support — Cenk Tosun may offer that, but it remains to be seen.

He is an excellent shot stopper, good in the air (where he wins over Randolph for me) but liable to the occasional blooper or lapse of concentration; nor does his confidence in his own ball dribbling and juggling abilities stand up to scrutiny.