If
a dog meets this definition, it is considered a service animal regardless of whether it has been «certified» by a local government or an animal training program.
Not exact matches
Some may be better or worse than others, but any breeding operation that places profit over the health or well - being of the
dogs meets the commonly accepted
definition of a puppy mill.
A breeder law has now been passed in Minnesota and the BAH is responsible for licensing and inspecting commercial
dog and cat breeders who
meet the
definition in the law.
A kennel not
meeting the
definition of «commercial kennel» where
dogs are kept or bred by their owner, for the purpose of hunting, tracking and exhibiting in
dog shows, performance events or field and obedience trials.
I think what is missing in the article in the paragraph on psychiatric service
dogs is a mention of the fact that a
dog is only a service
dog if the handler is legally disabled (
meets the ADA
definition) and the
dog is trained multiple, demonstrable tasks that relate directly to the handler's needs.
Yet under the proposed regulations, if PETA sterilizes animals for the public (which it does), sends animals to their deaths at local pounds (which it does), and occasionally tweets about a
dog (which it does), it would
meet the proposed regulatory
definition of a «private shelter.»
Here is our
definition of «puppy mill»: any profit - centered breeding facility in which the number of
dogs has exceeded the owner's ability and / or willingness to
meet the physical and emotional needs of all of the animals to a degree that permits the animals to have a decent quality of life.
Dog owners in our state have a responsibility to maintain control of their dogs, particularly if their pet meets the definition of a «dangerous dog» as set forth in Chapter 767 of
Dog owners in our state have a responsibility to maintain control of their
dogs, particularly if their pet
meets the
definition of a «dangerous
dog» as set forth in Chapter 767 of
dog» as set forth in Chapter 767 of...