Studies have shown that mandatory spay / neuter laws and heavy fines for non-compliance with dog ordinances don't work.
Not exact matches
They
do likely establish that the tenant had a duty of care to keep his
dog under control (per
ordinance in most cities and towns), and it not, to ensure the mail carrier was aware of the presence of a
dog.
The
ordinance does have an exemption for small «backyard» breeders and those who raise
dogs and cats at their home or business, AZCentral.com reports, yet it also bans the use of «animals as prizes» at carnivals and amusement parks, which includes goldfish, insects, bunnies, and other critters (another nice piece of news to hear!).
The
ordinance did exempted certain animals, including those that have competed in shows or sporting competitions, guide
dogs, animals used by police agencies, and those belonging to professional breeders.
The draft left much of the city's existing
ordinance in place but
did address provisions regarding dangerous and vicious animals, which primarily applied to
dogs.
Although the plaintiffs and their experts claim that the
ordinance does not give them enough guidance to enable owners to determine whether their
dogs fall within its scope, the evidence established that the plaintiffs themselves often use the term «pit bull» as a shorthand method of referring to their
dogs.
Although there were nine
dogs in the house, including a pregnant pit bull, the animals
did not violate any city
ordinance because six of them were puppies.
Does AVMA have any guidelines for basic education veterinarians should provide to new puppy /
dog owners such as info on local
dog ordinances, educating owners why
dogs running loose are a problem, how to prevent unwanted litters (other than pushing for spay / neuter), laying out a sensible plan for routine healthcare for the next year or two and providing information about socialization and basic training such as sitting for greeting, crate training, getting the
dog used to being handled and groomed etc.?
If we harness the passion for
dogs like Lennox, we
do have the power to enact changes in
ordinances like this throughout the country by making the stories of these
dogs, the injustices against them, more public.
With passage of such
ordinances comes a host of questions such as: How
do you prove in court the identity of a mixed - breed
dog?
«There is a growing awareness that BSL
does not improve community safety and penalizes responsible
dog owners and their family companions... If communities wish to implement effective
dog bite prevention programs, recommendations continue to shift in favor of multifactorial approaches focusing on improved ownership and husbandry practices, better understanding of
dog behavior, education of parents and children regarding safety around
dogs, and consistent enforcement of dangerous
dog / reckless owner
ordinances in communities.
Williams - who liked to walk her Airedale terrier, Eric, in the park - suggests that signs be posted in the park warning of the fines that will be imposed if pet owners
do not abide by the current city
ordinance requiring them to keep their
dogs on leashes and to clean up after them.
We believe that a mandatory
ordinance does not address the core problem of
dog and cat homelessness, which stems from irresponsible pet ownership.
«We're either going to pass an
ordinance that has some teeth to it and says we don't want people selling puppy mill
dogs in our town or we're not,» Russell said.
We
did everything, you know, complied with the City
ordinance but they still wanted to remove the
dogs.»
If someone is injured by a
dog not covered by the breed specific
ordinance, the
ordinance does not apply.
It is defined as any
ordinance or policy that pertains to a specific
dog breed or several breeds, but
does not affect any others.
Since ample evidence exists to establish a rational relationship between the city's classification of certain
dogs as pit bulls, and since there is a legitimate governmental purpose of protecting the health and safety of the city's residents and
dogs, the trial court correctly concluded that the
ordinance did not violate the
dog owners» right to equal protection of the laws.â $
The
ordinance does away with the city's breed - specific rules requiring owners to obtain special licenses and to implant microchips in any
dogs that have the appearance and characteristics of being predominantly of any of three types of pit bull
dog.
Proposed by City Councilman Jesse Arreguin, the
ordinance would allow renters to own small pets (including
dogs and cats) under 25 pounds, provided that the animal
does not pose a danger to others.
Tybee
does have a noise
ordinance and this
does include
dog barking.