Sentences with phrase «dog owner of a dangerous dog»

Not exact matches

Rather than penalising certain breed types, which compromises the welfare of the animal, Dogs Trust wants to see a clear legislative focus on «deed not breed» and a new dialogue on the social problem of «dangerous owners»..

It provides peace of mind for owners and ensures that dangerous dogs can be kept off of our streets.»

Richin said the law should require owners of dangerous dogs to be trained to properly care for them, and dogs should be kept in yards with security fencing.

Nationally, we think it's time that all dogs were microchipped so it's easy to identify the owners of dangerous dogs.»

W. Bruce Cameron, best known for his dog - centered fiction series and the memoir 8 Simple Rules for Dating My Teenage Daughter, uses his own past as a repo man to craft the character of Ruddy McCann, failed college football star who now plays the sometimes dangerous game of seizing autos from their delinquent owners.

Some renters insurance policies will charge higher premiums to owners of dogs classified broadly as «dangerous breeds.»

A mistake many dog owners make is waiting until the unwanted behavior gets to the point where it becomes dangerous, difficult to change or potentially costly, as in the case of a dog bite.

Carol Plescia, owner of Acadia Antlers in Ramsey, N.J., says dog owners are aware that Chinese - made jerky and rawhide chews can contain formaldehyde and other dangerous chemicals.

The Perry Ferrini Dog Park and the Schererville Park Department reserve the right to revoke park privileges to any member who fails to follow park rules and etiquette or where it is determined a member dog or dog owner is dangerous to others or in violation of any applicable animal ordinances or regulatioDog Park and the Schererville Park Department reserve the right to revoke park privileges to any member who fails to follow park rules and etiquette or where it is determined a member dog or dog owner is dangerous to others or in violation of any applicable animal ordinances or regulatiodog or dog owner is dangerous to others or in violation of any applicable animal ordinances or regulatiodog owner is dangerous to others or in violation of any applicable animal ordinances or regulations.

Dogs are very loyal, and they tend to show their loyalty by disapproving of what they thing could be dangerous or a threat to their owners.

The Bill creates a presumption that the owner of a dog (of any breed) who has caused injury to a person knew or should have known that their dog had dangerous propensities.

Most dogs are at risk of overheating in summer and as a pet owner, of course, you are well informed of how dangerous overheating for pets can be.

These states and the District of Columbia require owners of dogs determined to be dangerous or vicious or in some cases, potentially dangerous, [regardless of breed] to obtain substantial liability insurance policies:

* Training / Behavior Modification hasn't resulted in an acceptable change in the dog; * There is significant risk and / or evidence that dog is going to seriously injure someone; aggression problems don't automatically mean the dog will injure someone or is dangerous; I am referring to the idea that even with reasonable precautions, supervision, training and behavior modification, the dog is still going to get around all of that and hurt someone; * You have made a reasonable effort to work with the dog and situation; meaning you have PAID a professional to help you, worked the situation properly and diligently, and you still can't trust the dog to not hurt itself, another animal or a person; * The dog is so dangerous you can't place the dog with someone else; * The owner isn't willing, or is unable, or unqualified, to work with the dog any further, even with supervised professional help; some people won't follow instructions, so some of these dogs would be fine in the hands of someone else, but not the current owner; * Regardless what you do (behavior modification, training, and / or behavioral medications) nothing has made the dog manageable, and your trainer is recommending you consider euthanasia; * Even behavioral medications can't alleviate the problem; I am experienced working with drugs prescribed by veterinarians and can give you feedback as to how things are going, or when you might wish to consider another drug; * This dog is too dangerous to work with.

The presence of medium and large breed dogs is usually more obvious, but they may flee from a dangerous scene unbeknownst to their concerned owner.

One of the reasons vets urge pet owners to use heartworm medications to protect their dogs is because they've witnessed the very difficult, dangerous treatment that's used in conventional medicine.

Yet across the country, owners of dangerous dogs are being punished for attacks with prison time, stiff fines, and probation.

If you aren't familiar with my views on dangerous dogs, I'm wary of certain breeds that have a higher percentage of dangerous dogs that other breeds, this coming after an un-neutered male German Shepard bit my daughter in the face and went on to bit at least 5 more victims before the owners moved out of town to save the dog from being put down.

We have cared for many German shepherds, Rottweiler's, Husky's, Dobermans, and most of the so called top 10 most dangerous dog breeds, these dogs are not dangerous as a breed, they are only a product of their owners training or breeders incompetence, so don't blame the breed, blame the humans!!

As a cautious pet owner, you have come to realize that many of your favorite foods are downright dangerous for your dog.

In that section the cites included only two articles, «The Plight of a Mauled Postal Carrier, an Attempt to Sue Animal Control and...» and «Pit Bull Owner Lies After Dog is Declared «Dangerous,» Dog Attacks Again».

The insurance requirement is part of a series of proposed changes to the animal control ordinance that include making owners of biting dogs attend mandatory education and training classes and buy «dangerous dog» tags that would be worn by their animals at all times.

Next Article: Book Review: Eminent Dogs, Dangerous Men: A sheepman's view of Border Collies and their owners Previous Article: Herding dogs: Herding dogs made livestock farming, wool industry possDogs, Dangerous Men: A sheepman's view of Border Collies and their owners Previous Article: Herding dogs: Herding dogs made livestock farming, wool industry possdogs: Herding dogs made livestock farming, wool industry possdogs made livestock farming, wool industry possible

The measure (CS - SB 1644) also requires owners of dangerous dogs to have their pets registered with animal control authorities.

Animal control, do not allow the same irresponsible owner to regain custody of a dangerous dog.

Choice of breed, personality and attitude, the ability to follow commands and anticipate potentially dangerous situations are all taken into consideration during training and before pairing a guide dog with its owner.

Most counties adopt a form of the Florida statute for identifying and punishing dangerous dogs and their owners.

Owners of dangerous dogs already had to post a warning sign at their residence.

Owners of dangerous dogs could face dramatically higher fines and be required to maintain up to $ 1 million in homeowners insurance under proposals the Brevard County Commission will consider today.Spurred by recent dog attacks that nearly killed a woman and injured a child, commissioners asked animal experts to propose new fines and help toughen the county's animal control ordinance.The proposed fee increases target all irresponsible pet owners, from those who fail to vaccinate their pets to owners whose dogs are involved in severe atOwners of dangerous dogs could face dramatically higher fines and be required to maintain up to $ 1 million in homeowners insurance under proposals the Brevard County Commission will consider today.Spurred by recent dog attacks that nearly killed a woman and injured a child, commissioners asked animal experts to propose new fines and help toughen the county's animal control ordinance.The proposed fee increases target all irresponsible pet owners, from those who fail to vaccinate their pets to owners whose dogs are involved in severe atowners, from those who fail to vaccinate their pets to owners whose dogs are involved in severe atowners whose dogs are involved in severe attacks.

Committee members favored requiring owners of dangerous dogs to provide proof of liability insurance of up to $ 1 million before the release of the dog.

On the contrary, these owners are acutely aware of the need for strong non-breed-specific dangerous / vicious dog laws, and they fully support efforts to strengthen and enforce those laws.

Owners of dangerous dogs also would have to pay an annual $ 500 registration fee, up from $ 25, and they would have to keep the dogs on leashes no longer than 4 feet.

In addition to educational programs within the community, Love - A-Bull also believes that dangerous dog laws should be focused on the actions or inaction of the owner, rather than on the breed of the dog.

Owners of dangerous dogs in Brevard County will pay a price, beginning with a $ 500 annual registration fee and $ 100,000 in liability insurance, county commissioners decided Tuesday, Such insurance may cost as much as $ 1,000 a year, staffers told commissioners, who approved it unanimously as part of a tougher animal control ordinance.Most of the fees given final approval Tuesday have been in effect since last fall when the commissioners adopted them by resolution.

The county charged Adams with failure to be a responsible owner, failure to confine dangerous dogs, and removal of dangerous dogs without notifying animal control after moving into the city limits.

The bill would have required owners of dangerous dogs to register their pets with local animal authorities each year.

The owners of dangerous dogs are required to provide animal control agencies with their new address if they move within the state.

The panel would give the owners of dangerous dogs a chance to appeal death sentences for their animals.

An owner of a dog found dangerous to humans, who has no additional violations after a 36 month period from the date of designation as dangerous to humans, may apply to the Director to remove the animal from the list of dangerous to humans upon proof of the successful completion of at least 8 weeks of formal obedience training, other similar evidence of training, or other rehabilitative efforts designed to mitigate the risk to public safety.

Dog Bite Prevention Week, in short, is not really protecting anyone but the breeders and owners of the most dangerous dogs, while perpetuating the myth that «any dog» can do what only dogs of a few closely related breeds do with tedious frequenDog Bite Prevention Week, in short, is not really protecting anyone but the breeders and owners of the most dangerous dogs, while perpetuating the myth that «any dog» can do what only dogs of a few closely related breeds do with tedious frequendog» can do what only dogs of a few closely related breeds do with tedious frequency.

While most dog owners can understand why any living creature, dog or human, would be attracted to chocolate, many make the tragic mistake of assuming their dogs won't be attracted to potentially dangerous substances that don't seem to be edible.

Dangerous dogs should be licenced and spayed or neutered as this may reduce aggressive tendencies and will prevent the owners from profiting from the sale of offspring that are also likely to be dDangerous dogs should be licenced and spayed or neutered as this may reduce aggressive tendencies and will prevent the owners from profiting from the sale of offspring that are also likely to be dangerousdangerous.

«Veterinarians, shelter volunteers and pet owners can fight the spread of heartworm and other dangerous diseases by administering a topical parasiticide like Vectra ® 3D, which kills and repels mosquitoes and other dangerous parasites, the moment those dogs come into their care.»

However, the majority of the time, retractable leashes are dangerous for dogs, their owners, and nearby pets and people.

The bill specifies that an owner of a «dangerous dog» must «Leash, chain, tie or tether the dog to an inanimate object other than one within a secure enclosure, such as a tree or building.»

It removes the option of the court allowing the owner or keeper of a dangerous dog to keep the animal and requires the court to either order the dog confined at a governmental facility, local humane society or similar nongovernmental organization for its lifetime or be euthanized.

Action: Committee voted unanimously to carry the bill over to allow AWAC (Animal Welfare Advisory Council) to work on recommendations that would more fairly and effectively address the issue of dangerous dogs and owner accountability to be presented to the Committee in 2018.

Whenever there are serious dog attacks, especially by dogs identified as pitbulls or Rottweilers, the press and the other media immediately raise the question as to whether the problem is a product of dangerous breeds or bad owners.

«HB 97 is great for Utah because it finally means that dangerous dog laws can focus on behavior — both of the owner and the dog — rather than breed or appearance.

The Ohio Legislature is considering a bill to fix the state's dangerous dog law by providing due process for owners whose pets are accused of crimes and eliminating the breed specific portion of the current law.