Sentences with phrase «dog trespassing»

All dogs feel protective of their own turf and may not welcome a strange dog trespassing in your yard.

Residents who are bothered by unleashed dogs trespassing on their property or by continuously barking dogs may find relief in reporting these complaints to animal control.

Not exact matches

I heard of a woman today who got attacked by a dog, climbed a telephone pole, fell out of a tree, was yelled at by a police officer on a 911 call, got patched in to the State Police in New York, was almost arrested and sent to jail, trespassed on several people's property, hurtled fences and hedges in a mad dash through a neighborhood, and even convinced a former mayor of our town to call in some favors to the local power company.

The BioBoundary project has the pungent task of studying wild dog urine to identify the scents that demarcate territory and send a «no trespassing» message.

Other Stuff We Watched Paradise Lost 3 Into the Abyss Dark Horse Killer Joe Hard Core Logo II Urbanized Undefeated Comic - Con Episode IV: A Fan's Hope Whores» Glory Melancholia Extraterrestrial Kill List The Raid Pearl Jam Twenty The Last Dogs of Winter Last Call at the Oasis The Last Gladiators The Moth Diaries Trespass Machine Gun Preacher The Island President The Descendants Intruders ALPS Shame Trainspotting United 93 Mimic: The Director's Cut

In short, the Court held that there was evidence that the attack occurred without provocation, that the child was not trespassing, and that the Hamptons were still liable even though they were not the dog's owner.

Barking also serves as a canine alarm to alert the dog's family of anything unusual — a sound, trespassing squirrel or your wearing a hat.

Your dog will need to learn where his new boundaries are and how to avoid trespassing that area.

An effective guard dog is able to intimidate anyone who trespasses on your property or threatens to harm you or your loved ones.

An overwhelmingly large percentage of these attacks occur when irresponsible children intentionally trespass, and in some cases, antagonize the dog.

While many dogs are naturally protective of their families, there are some breeds that excel in this role better than others, and there are definitively breeds that make poor guard dogs and wouldn't mind at all if a stranger would trespass your property.

In essence the dogs that were most willing to alert when someone or something trespassed were often the ones chosen to be bred.

For centuries, dogs have been warning their families about possible dangers and strangers trespassing, through barking, and owners have been praising and rewarding them for being good guardians.

How about this... If a minor trespasses into a locked vehicle, home, kennel or fenced yard and the dog bites them... the parents of the kid should be arrested.

These children often instigate the attack by trespassing, throwing objects at dogs, harassing, torturing, and otherwise acting in a threatening manner toward the dog thus instigating an attack.

Finally, you know that PETA has filed various motions to have the case dismissed by arguing that the dog was worthless, she had no value beyond the cost of replacement for another dog, they had permission by the property owner to remove community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering and killing a dog, the family is not entitled to punitive damages because PETA's theft and immediate killing of a happy, healthy, beloved dog is not «outrageous» conduct, and in an argument with racist overtones, that the family may not be in the country legally so PETA should be allowed to get away with the theft and murder of their dog.

Often they'll want to be left alone more than before and won't have much understanding for other dogs and animals, and people trespassing in their space, even those that they got along with nicely before.

In this case, a cat launched itself at a dog that trespassed on its property and «its boy».

Finally, I hope that my dogs would eat anybody who would be trespassing my property.

Lawsuit update: PETA tells the Court that Maya was worthless and therefore they can't be financially liable to the family, that, at best, the dog had no value beyond the cost of replacement for another dog, they had permission by the property owner to remove community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering and killing a dog, and the family is not entitled to punitive damages because PETA's theft and immediate killing of a happy, healthy, beloved dog is not «outrageous» conduct.

Being involved in the crime such as by backing the van onto the property and driving away with the dog so that a trespass could occur and Maya stolen is enough to be held liable for trespass and «conversion» of property even if she didn't actually enter the property herself and grab the dog.

But Maya's family sued PETA abd the two PETA employees for compensatory and punitive damages, alleging conversion of their dog (theft), trespass, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

But Maya's family sued PETA for compensatory and punitive damages, alleging conversion of their dog (theft), trespass, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

PETA had permission by the trailer park property owner to kill community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering private property and killing a dog;

PETA, in turn, asked the court to throw out the lawsuit by arguing that the dog was unlicensed so was not worth anything, the dog had no value beyond the cost of replacement for another dog, they had permission by the property owner to remove community cats so they can not be guilty of trespass for entering and killing a dog, and the family is not entitled to punitive damages because PETA's theft and immediate killing of a happy, healthy, beloved dog is not «outrageous» conduct.

They gate their property, post No Trespassing signs, require a sign in sheet before anyone looks at the dogs, and if intruded upon, they demand a warrant.

Often owners are ordered to put their dogs down because of an alleged biting or trespassing incident.

Our youngest Dog Jet is especially vocal about anything trespassing on her territory.

Further, unless a person is actually threatening you, or is trespassing on your property, in most cases you'd go to prison if your dog attacked them.

Kids can help themselves to your yard and your dogs at any time (and if one of those kids claims to have been bitten by one of your dogs it doesn't matter that the dogs were in your yard, the kids were trespassing OR that they may not have actually been bitten by the dog).

A potentially dangerous dog, while on the owner's property, shall, at all times, be kept indoors, or in a securely fenced yard from which the dog can not escape, and into which children can not trespass.

A caveat to the Massachusetts law is that you must not have provoked or teased the dog before it attacked you or that you were not trespassing.

The same is true of owners who allow their pets onto a premises that specifically prohibits dogs from trespassing.

The only exceptions may be when the dog attack was provoked by cruelty toward the animal or when a dog bites someone who was committing a crime or trespassing on the owner's property.

In Ohio, the injured party must still prove to have not trespassed or teased, tormented, or tortured the dog on the dog owner's property.

It is, however, necessary to prove the defendant's ownership of the dog, that there was no trespassing, and that the victim did not provoke the dog.

The owner, however, is not liable if the victim provoked the dog or was trespassing on the dog's property where there was clearly a «No Trespassing» or «Beware of Dog» sidog or was trespassing on the dog's property where there was clearly a «No Trespassing» or «Beware of Dog&rtrespassing on the dog's property where there was clearly a «No Trespassing» or «Beware of Dog» sidog's property where there was clearly a «No Trespassing» or «Beware of Dog&rTrespassing» or «Beware of Dog» siDog» sign.

If you were lawfully on private property and were not trespassing, committing a crime, tormenting or abusing the animal, and you didn't have a history of abusing the animal in question, then the dog's owner should be liable for your damages under Washington's dog bite laws.

The dog owner's property had obvious warning signs, like «beware of dog» or «no trespassing,» and you were present on the property;

In California, a dog owner is strictly liable for any dog bite regardless of whether he or she failed to protect others from the attack, or had no reason to know the dog was dangerous, provided that the victim was not trespassing or provoking the dog

It is often not necessary to prove negligence when a dog bites someone that was not tormenting the dog and was not trespassing.

You should also know that if you suffer a dog bite in Texas while trespassing, committing a crime, or provoking a dog to violence, you may not have legal grounds to file a claim.

As long as you were lawfully present and not trespassing when the attack occurred, you can seek compensation from the owner of the dog even if the owner did not know of their dog's dangerous tendencies or viciousness.

The exception to both of these rules occurs when the person who was bit was trespassing on the dog owner's property at the time of the attack, or if the person attacked was provoking the dog by teasing, taunting, or abusing it.

With the exception of young children, victims have to show they were not teasing or tormenting a dog or trespassing.

Actions like trespassing on someone's property or antagonizing the dog can contribute to the reasons for the attack and limit a person's opportunity to seek damages.

In addition, dog owners are liable for injuries caused by their dogs as long as the injured child was not trespassing or teasing the animal.

In most states, dog owners are not liable if the injured person is trespassing on the owner's property.