Sentences with phrase «doing author question»

YouTube Live is ideal for authors who want to build up their content portfolio by doing author question and answer sessions.

Not exact matches

Geoff Llopis, author of The Innovation Mentality, asks a valid question: «Why do people need your diversity and inclusion plan, and what is the opportunity it is solving for you?»

This could be because the original article leaves the author enough wiggle room, including the use of a question mark headline, to say, «I didn't say we knew for sure.»

The question then becomes for the people who add value and try to be useful to authors and readers — and that includes publishers and booksellers — how do you evolve being useful in a digital world?

That's the question posed by author Laura Vanderkam in her new e-book What the Most Successful People Do on the Weekend, a follow - up to her popular What the Most Successful People Do Before Breakfast.

However, David Burkus, associate professor of management at Oral Roberts University and author of the forthcoming book Under New Management, questions whether that obsession with secrecy might do a company culture more harm than good.

The Facebook COO and best - selling author challenges women at Chicago's BlogHer conference to answer the question: «What would you do if you weren't afraid?»

Not only does playing a team sport like water polo, soccer, or volleyball help you look like a team player, but Vicky Oliver, the author of «Live Like A Millionaire (Without Having To Be One)» and «301 Smart Answers to Tough Interview Questions,» tells Business Insider that being a captain adds leadership ability to your list of skills.

Collins is the author of the best - selling business books Built to Last and Good to Great, both of which address this simple but vexing question: Why do some companies become great while others flounder?

In this paper, the authors started with the following question: «Do persistently low nominal interest rates mean that governments can safely borrow more?»

I didn't want to question the author's sincerity; I trusted that his motives were good.

What the author can do is prod the reader to address to himself the questions the discourses raise.

«He was just the wrong man for the wrong time, which is nothing to do with him as a person,» said Christopher M. Bellitto, author of the book «101 Questions and Answers on Popes and the Papacy.»

You can say, the Bible makes God out to be a bully, even though God isn't real, but then the question is why do authors of the Bible, including Moses, insist that God is a God of Love even when they tell of these stories of brutality?

Thank you for your response (for those of you who don't know me, I am the author of A Load of Bright and the article in question).

I don't think the various Gospel authors had Jesus asking question to show he did not know, nor to say «my peace is in the questions» but instead as a mere rhetorical tool to make a point and tell what he thought the answers were.

(ENTIRE BOOK) The author deals with the question: Do we carry out our projects on a stage that is blind, neutral and indifferent?

2) name usage statistics do not guarantee the miraculous — but they certainly place an author in that immediate context (or at the very least, with direct access to someone who was from that immediate context), which is a MAJOR contingency that has been much debated in the question of authorship... which IS the topic you raised.

The human capacity to author life and skip all over the genetic alphabet raises theological questions, just as does the human capacity to destroy life on a grand scale and actually put ourselves, for the first time, in a position to be uncreators.

@Russ, I really don't know the author's answer, but it seems reasonable to guess that necessity could answer those questions:

The authors of Scripture do not always speak with one voice, but this is because they are presenting the question of the character of God in different ways.

The question then becomes, «What does the author of Hebrews think will happen to these Hebrew Christians if they do return to Judaism?»

did this company or author have the same style of questions for the current President who also professes to be a Christian?

As the author notes in the beginning, this volume is not intended as a homily, but rather as a companion; and like a trusted companion, it does not simply conduct a one - sided soliloquy over history and texts, but behaves dynamically: telling stories, empathizing with human frailty, and anticipating questions.

These are not questions with fixed answers, and while I don't agree with (or necessarily understand) all of the authors» conclusions, it is a welcome chance to step outside the paths that have been well trodden by a multitude of «science vs religion» books.

Now that the author has seemingly done damage to the integrity of the biblical text to the point that we can apparently know nothing more, or do nothing more, than feel our way around in the dark never being certain of what God's Holy Word says I ask this question:

The author closes with a chapter stating that while he does not judge or condemn those who see things differently that he does, he hopes such people will not condemn him either, but will allow him (and others) to face the difficult questions about church that need to be asked.

But more important is the question of what basis there is for distinguishing «false» transcendence from «true» except, as the authors finally do, by reference to the realm of ordinary moral judgment and their own collective and informed insight.

This author in my opinion deep inside is questioning her faith but like a security blanket to a child does not want to get rid of it and is looking for any explanation she can come up with to hold onto it even in the face of the reality that the text that faith is based upon is highly flawed and frankly quite silly.

In 1984 a friend of the author faced severe cancer, and from that experience asked questions which sophisticated professionals rarely pose: Did he pray?

In a way, the author is trying to answer the question, «Why do bad things happen to good people?»

I have a lot of similar questions about BIble, just like the author does.

Very well put, a lingering question is what to do about the passages where God / Jesus in the OT / Revelation are said to be the authors of violence.

The basic question is, What did the author actually write?

For the sake of the individual authors, I won't say which essays I didn't care for, although, since I was looking for specific information for a book I am writing, the fault was probably not with the authors themselves, but with the question I was researching.

I'll be attending as both an author and a church - planter, but with one big question in mind: What does it mean to celebrate Big Tent Christianity in small town America?

I think the author is displaying the best of being Jewish — critical thinking, questioning why she does things rather than just accepting everything with no questioning (which is very anti-Jewish in my opinion and seems to be what you suggest.)

How about this question for the author who uses a public forum to spit on the religion he calls his own: Do you know what blasphemy means?

Dale Hanson Burke, author of Immigration: Tough Questions, Direct Answers, also wrote about what to do when one doesn't know a family's status.

As we hope will be clear from the context from which this book has emerged, we do not question the good intentions of the authors, nor their skill, evident throughout the book, in presenting relevant issues clearly and effectively.

A summary of the author's doctoral dissertation research on U.S. teens and religious identity, in which she explored two interrelated questions: what do teens mean when they say they are religious (or not religious)?

The authors of the report say that people doing federal research on things like income, spending and health should also ask questions about happiness because of the more developed view it could lend to in setting policies to improve people's lives.

However, the question and the answer may have nothing to do with expressing what the author felt when it was written, felt after it was written, or interpreted it in the future.

I do have a couple of questions for the author:

(2) Does the passage in question reflect the style used in other parts of the author's work?

That said, I was recently at a book event at a store and the second the author opened up the floor to questions, someone said «I made xyz recipe and it didn't come out!»

I do not think the author was questioning peoples love for the club but to support the club and how we go about it.

While the authors seem to have an amazing grasp of the PGA Tour scene, I do, however, have one question after reading their story: How does one separate fact from fiction?

Addressing the first question, plastic surgeon Bryan Mendelson, author of In Your Face, says «people have surgery not to impress others, they do it to impress themselves.

Author of the review, Jane Muncke, didn't mince words when issuing her findings, calling into question the current means of estimating the true level of exposure to EDC's through food contact materials.