Sentences with phrase «doing basic science research»

«We're forming collaborations with researchers at Loyola and other centers doing basic science research as well as studies with more immediate clinical applications,» said Michael Zilliox, PhD, director of the Loyola Genomics Facility.

Not exact matches

We did visit a local school here and saw their «science fair» but it seemed to consist of rather basic projects with lots of printouts from the Internet and CD encyclopedias, with no research or experiments or anything other than a display that looked nice.

Some people wind up doing basic research for a living, but most apply [statistics] to a problem, be it [in the] life sciences, or health care, or modeling the stock market.»

The business side of science operates on fundamentally different rules than does basic research.

She published a response pointing out that the conservative media had missed the point of doing basic science, and she participated in media interviews that gave a more accurate and balanced portrayal of her research.

Others wish to return to basic science research so that they don't have to wonder whether corporate priorities are forcing them to change focus.

«Without funding for basic science, we do not have new fundamental knowledge to move into applied research projects.

For example, if you know that you want to do basic research and run a lab in the biological sciences, the appropriate graduate degree is a Ph.D..

Do you know that Heimlich did a lot of basic science research?

«I've continually thought about maintaining the balance between our basic research and our translational work, and making sure that, as the company grows and there's a need to move more molecules into the clinic, we don't lose our emphasis on basic science,» Scheller explains.

The cultural chasm between science and clinical practice involves the very distinct mentalities required to practice clinical medicine and to do basic biomedical research.

Students often choose to do their dissertation research in a laboratory, conducting basic science research with distant ties to human diseases or clinical problems.

In the October 2012 issue, we publish our Global Science Scorecard, a ranking of nations on how well they do science — not only on the quality and quantity of basic research but also on their ability to project that research into the real world, where it can affect people's lives.The United States comes out on top, by a wide margin, followed by Germany, China, Japan, the U.K., France, Canada, South Korea, Italy andScience Scorecard, a ranking of nations on how well they do science — not only on the quality and quantity of basic research but also on their ability to project that research into the real world, where it can affect people's lives.The United States comes out on top, by a wide margin, followed by Germany, China, Japan, the U.K., France, Canada, South Korea, Italy andscience — not only on the quality and quantity of basic research but also on their ability to project that research into the real world, where it can affect people's lives.The United States comes out on top, by a wide margin, followed by Germany, China, Japan, the U.K., France, Canada, South Korea, Italy and Spain.

A survey by Roach and Sauermann of more than 400 graduate students at three Research I universities shows that some of the aspiring researchers do strongly possess what Sauermann and other researchers call «a taste for science,» which they define as a desire to do basic research, to determine the direction of one's projects, to publish in peer - reviewed journals, and to participate actively in the scientific coResearch I universities shows that some of the aspiring researchers do strongly possess what Sauermann and other researchers call «a taste for science,» which they define as a desire to do basic research, to determine the direction of one's projects, to publish in peer - reviewed journals, and to participate actively in the scientific coresearch, to determine the direction of one's projects, to publish in peer - reviewed journals, and to participate actively in the scientific community.

Life scientists in companies are likelier than their physical science counterparts to do basic research, whereas life scientists on campus are likelier than comparable physical scientists to do applied work.

The members of the alliance — the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; the Kavli, Simons, and Sloan foundations; the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; and the Research Corporation for Science Advancement — want to ease that crisis by getting more people and organizations to emulate what they are already doing: giving money to the nation's universities for basic sScience Advancement — want to ease that crisis by getting more people and organizations to emulate what they are already doing: giving money to the nation's universities for basic sciencescience.

[BOX 3: Grants and Contracts] Financial Statements, 1957 - 1959 Financial Reports, 1957 - 1959 Financial Statements, 1958 Financial Reports 1960-1961 1962 1963 1964-1965 1966-1967 Report on Review of Source Data Preparation for Accounting Purposes, Oct. 1961 AAAS Budgets, 1968 - 1969 Financial Reports, 1968 - 1969 Financial Statements and Accountant's Opinion, 1969 Financial Statements and Accountant's Opinion, 1970 Financial Reports, 1970 - 1971 Financial Reports, 1972 Financial Reports from Operations, 1979 Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 1974 and Projections to 1963 Report for Examination of Financial Statements and Additional Information, 1983 - 1984 Closed out Funds and Stocks AAAS Grants Committee, 1955 AID Audit - Mexico City, 1974 Asia Foundation, 1955 - 1975 Boston Concerts Carnegie Corp. - Grant to AAAS for Science Teaching Improvement Program Graham Chedd - Contract [3 folders], 1973 - 1977 DOS - AID Irene Tinker, 1973 - 1977 RISM Research for the Study of Man, 1973 - 1977 Smithsonian, 1971 - 1977 Audit, 1973 - 1977 Close Out, 1976 - 1978 GE Grant - Regional Consultants on Science Teaching, 1956 Gordon Marshall, Exhibits Contract, 1952 National Endowment of the Arts, 1973 NSF Grant - Soviet Science, 1952 Training Talented Students, 1955 Travelling High School Library, 1956 Gordon Conference on Teacher Education, 1956 Junior Academies Workshop, 1957 Proposal to NSF for Development of Science Teaching Materials for Elementary and Junior High Schools, 1961 Progress Report to the NSF on the Holiday Science Lecture Program, 1963 Proposal to the NSF for 1964 Visiting Foreign Staff Project, 1963 NSF - US - Japan Comparative Science Program, 1963 NSF - US - Japan Cooperative Science Program, 1964 WGBH, 1972 Willis Shapley, Contract Agreement, Oct. 1978 DHEW - Barrier Free Meetings, Oct. 1977 CBS News - Conquest Program Series, 1959 MISCO Contract - original, 1972 Basic Books Publishing - New Roads to Yesterday, 1963 - 1966

Brooks did say that «my priorities would be to protect basic research in the sciences as much as possible, even to the extent of cutting entitlements, in order to generate enough funding for basic research.»

The Clinical Accelerator, building on 60 + years of CRI's dedication to funding the most innovative basic science in tumor immunology, enables experts to advance their most ambitious clinical and translational research ideas to cure cancer, and accelerates studies that one group or company could not do alone.

He was the first president since John F. Kennedy to do that, and if you read that speech, which is still on the web I believe — both at the Academy web site and my friend Ralph Cicerone, president of the National Academy of Sciences, is in the front row — and it's also on the White House web site — what you will find is although the president was clear about the practical applications of science and technology to our great challenges as I've mentioned, he probably spent two thirds of that talk talking about the importance of basic science; the importance of fundamental research in science and technology to our national well - being; and the importance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education.

This is one of many small blind spots in the life sciences, places where the lack of basic development, documentation, and tooling has led to company after company, research group after research group deciding to do something else with their limited funds rather than be forced into building every last part of the basic toolkit they'd need to even get started.

This work was done at the Center for Molecular Electrocatalysis, an Energy Frontier Research Center, or EFRC, funded by the DOE Office of Science's Basic Energy Sciences Office.

This work was done through the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, funded by Basic Energy Sciences at DOE's Office of Science.

But the type of science that instead aims to fill gaps in our understanding of the world — known as «basic» or «foundational» research — doesn't focus on specific applications, like a disease cure or a drought - resistant crop, so no one can predict the real - world impact of any individual line of inquiry.

The Weston Price Foundation is based on the idea that we should ignore all of the clinical, epidemiological, and basic science research that has been done to date, and base our nutrition decisions on what a dentist from the 1920's thought.

(By contrast, Amrein and Berliner did no significance testing whatsoever, neglecting one of the oldest and most basic tools of social - science research.)

Teaching Reading is Rocket Science: What Expert Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do (American Federation of Teachers)(36 pages, pdf) «Research shows that a child who doesn't learn the reading basics early is unlikely to learn them at all.

There's plenty more he can do, of course, including making the case for boosted investments in basic science, basic research by industry and programs that foster youth and public understanding of science and the environment.

Peter, the basic idea is worth considering, but you have to do the hard numerical science and show the numbers and evidence, with field research or an internet link to research done by others.

In a Wall Street Journal op - ed piece on Sunday, friend of WUWT Matt Ridley argues that basic science research does not lead to technological innovation, and therefore isn't deserving of taxpayer funding.

«Besides being a good summary of the massive controversy behind the scenes in the climate science research community about the causes of the past century's modest warming, Climate Change Reconsidered could make a good text book for university (and advanced senior high school classes) climate change courses as well since they do an easily understood and accurate review of the related basic science at the beginning of each of the topic - specific chapters.»

The rest of your objections are similarily unfounded, you should do some basic research into the science before trying to form such strong convictions.