Sentences with phrase «doing by supporting people»

Not exact matches

Obama gave The Atlantic several reasons for not enforcing the red line — uneasiness about a strike against Syria not being sanctioned by Congress, a lack of support from the international community and the American people, the possibility that the intelligence on the chemical - weapons attack wasn't 100 % solid — but did not mention the Iran deal among them.

«There's a recognition by a lot of the provinces that a lot of people are going to retire with inadequate pensions and they're going to have to do something about it,» said president Ken Georgetti, adding that workers his group spoke to supported a provincial pension plan.

An exemplary team player is honored, respected and loved by all coworkers because they know they can rely on this person for support and to do the right thing in challenging times.

For people to do their very best work, they need an organizational environment that supports them by making it safe to take risks, to tell the truth, and to speak up... without being punished for doing so.

When we do this, beyond connecting online, we reinforce our physical communities by bringing us together in person to support each other.

This week, polls suggest the opposite: people do not think that the executive actions will reduce the number of people killed by gun, but they solidly support the proposals.

«You often get more by finding out what the other person wants than you do by clever arguments supporting what you need.»

Again, you don't solve that by a periodic blitz on all the content; you solve that by having a system, and a system means that whenever a Customer Support person bumps into a document, either reported by a customer or not, they will have to file a bug against it.

Underneath the claim was a genuine problem with the message, that people truly wishing to assist the protesters could do so simply by checking in rather than sending funds or supplies to support their efforts.

Lower interest rates might have provided a bit more support, but would have done so partly by encouraging people to borrow yet more money, thus adding to the risks.

They do this by providing guidance, support, and making sure people have what they need, rather than a low - autonomy GPS - style management of giving turn - by - turn directions.

This will help you visualize what you are trying to do with the content mapping and storing of content that's easily accessible by anyone (sales people, for example) to support individual sales processes.

«How do we support and do right by those people while remaining a two - way platform?»

Boehner's move marks a fundamental shift for a man who said nine years ago he was «unalterably opposed» to legalization, and indicates that pot is increasingly supported by the American establishment even if the Attorney General still believes «good people don't smoke marijuana.»

@Noah, That book is ridiculous... He claims the universe is likely younger than 13.7 b.y. and backs it up by claiming that 100 + measurements taken over the past 300 years supports the claim that light does not travel at a constant rate... As if people 300 years ago could measure with the kind of accuracy we can today

I understand your article Kerry and how family can be and should be a support in birth, in living and in death, however so many people on this earth do not get to experience that... so many times families are torn apart or kids are abandoned and marriages ruined by one thing or another, so we must realize who gave us life, what purpose he gave us life for!

This is exactly why religious people are having difficulties coming to terms that there is no God — they construct an «evidence» for God because they simply desire to do so; they do so when it is not supported by logic and / or despite logic.

That however does NOT mean that the bible is not true (An ad hominem (Latin for «to the man» or «to the person»), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it)

These public figures are well protected by «yes» people and do respond to anything unless there is a huge groundswell of opinion (and even then there are too many examples of them closing ranks and supporting each other).

I know you are pretty much supporting my comment, and I don't mean to be rude, but I think Baden's exclusion of the Islamic approach is much more egregious than his non-mention of the Christian approach — seeing as half of the conflict he is discussing is driven mainly by Islamic people and Islamically - oriented ideology.

The sad part it, these numbers you trot out, which you are oblivious to the statistical problems inherent in them, were obviously put together by someone with a knowledge of statistics and manipulated so gullible people like yourself would use them to argue a cause which the true evidence does not support.

Actually the MAJORITY DO N'T SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE that why you had to have the peoples will overturned in court and in every place where gays needed a vote for marriage it was overturned or the heads of gov rammed it down peoples throats and why are sticking up for Tom you aren't US citizen by birth either?

I think religion promotes this behavior by teaching people that somehow it is better to maintain your faith in something at all costs than admit you're wrong when the evidence doesn't support your view.

If people are being hurt by Irving, you wonder if you should go public with what is occuring or if you should be silent and support the victims the best you can or do nothing in order not to risk job loss.

It is possible that a few people will die in that act (which will be publicly condemned but privately supported by many Americans)- showing that many Americans DO in fact approve of murder of innocent people when it is «for a good cause»...

people are forcing business owners to support weddings and such of gays by forcing them to make cakes for their weddings... we should not be forced to bake a cake for a wedding that we do not support

There is a personal unburdening that can happen by e-mail that builds community When people feel well supported, pastors have less work to do.

There are times where people in our church community come around us and tell us they believe in what we're doing by supporting us in different ways.

To me, the most significant single point is that for people today «sacred meaning does not derive from a rooted concept supported by common tradition and institutions; rather, meaning is located in the unfolding of one's own life.»

Did Dave Ramsey consider faithful Christians, pastors in communities too small to support a pastor... or the fact that a 3000 church can pay persons that are not head pastors such low wages that they have to seek gov. Assistance... are these people shuned by God despite their dedicationn to a ministry position that does not get the prestige of the head pastor position.

To do that we have to establish a way to prove an assumption by: 1) asserting a hypothesis and its components 2) testing the components for substantial supporting evidence, unsupported components go back to be refined 3) either agree after successful testing that in our shared reality the hypothesis is now supported, or that overall unsupported components may mean the hypothesis fails 4) for sake of ease many people call these tested and supported hypotheses «facts», but again that's just so that we can get on with progress.

People complained about that and pepole said then don't support them by eating there.

The only reason you people do not have an issue with the President's support of gay marriage is because you do not care about or are not bound by the laws of God.

Hunting people down for copyright violations is a waste of time that could be better spent supporting the work done by enthusiastic Catholics free of charge for the love of God.

A small group of people gathers here to support scientific research done by the United States Antarctic Program.

By nature, the present President of America has that element in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded as exceptional in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to accept their Light within of consensus through individual projections under control as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend as leverage to the person in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval as ego of his working element as the executive public ally chosen as the President that had appealed to the public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light over the past of America and that stands as the subtle truth even today as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he accepted well in his individual capacity as the free lance ex President of America.

When society supports the terminally ill in committing suicide — by not engaging in suicide prevention for them as we do for other categories of suicidal people, and by legalizing access to lethal means — it sends the insidious message that the lives of the dying are less important and less worth protecting than are those of the healthy, and even that their families (and society) may be better off if they die sooner rather than later.

Ronald... you are not doing any favors for «Romney / Ryan 2012» by saying something ignorant and then stating your support for them In fact, I think you are motivating the swing voters more than anyone else — no educated person would honestly say they agree with your statements or opinions.

If I supported gay relationships and was wrong, I could be sinning by encouraging people to do something wrong, but if I opposed gay relationships and was wrong, I would be sinning by putting myself and others back under the law and making Christ «of no value.

In A.D. 1500, Islam, supported by the Turks and by various peoples of Central Asia; Confucianism, the system on which the Chinese Empire, larger and more populous and apparently more highly civilized than all of Western Europe, was based; Hinduism, the faith of the majority of the peoples of India, a subcontinent more varied racially and probably more populous and wealthier than fifteenth - century Western Europe; and Buddhism, with extensive followings in Southern, Central, and Eastern Asia, all loomed larger in human affairs than did Christianity.

But it is shared by people whose marriages have been broken, who remain unreconciled, and who» because we can do no more than «support» them in their brokenness» must experience our liturgies, architecture, and teaching as profoundly dissonant and unconvincing.

loc, B. Lohmeyer, Das Evangelium des Markus [1937], ad loc., seek in vain to avoid this conclusion, which is supported by the strong Greek expressions for «tremble and shrink», by giving explanations which do not fit the situation, in which Jesus already knows that He must suffer for the sins of His people [Last Supper].

Then when Barth himself changed his mind — as he so often and so publicly did, as if it were merely a matter of an excusable error after he had formerly fired so all - inclusive a barrage in support of his now - discarded view — it is small wonder that many people became exasperated and, though they might themselves be deeply influenced by him, preferred not to admit it.

JUST because people USED the Bible to support racial and gender discrimination does nOT mean the BIBLE ITSELf supported it... racial and gender discrimination is nOT supported by the Bible...

Because if grace is water, then the church should be an ocean It's not a museum for good people, it's a hospital for the broken Which means I don't have to hide my failure, I don't have to hide my sin Because it doesn't depend on me it depends on him See because when I was God's enemy and certainly not a fan He looked down and said I want, that, man Which is why Jesus hated religion, and for it he called them fools Don't you see so much better than just following some rules Now let me clarify, I love the church, I love the Bible, and yes I believe in sin But if Jesus came to your church would they actually let him in See remember he was called a glutton, and a drunkard by religious men But the Son of God never supports self righteousness not now, not then

But most people that don't believe in a diety are never threatened by those that believe... usually we just watch with aww and fascination of how someone can believe such things with no supporting data.

You hide behind lies told by many others and support them fully and propagate your own or repost lies told by people in deceptions and don't understand basic truth like a animal that does things on instinct just destroying for the sake of it in hopes to destroy enough that they can change things to be more suited to themselves.

Furthermore, the entire point of my post was to show that even though I am a Christian and do not agree with the atheist view of God (which is to say the idea of the absense of God), I STILL support this soldier in their right to attend the ceremony and NOT have to bow their head, and believe that any Christian or other person who would force this soldier to do so by threat of removal from the ceremony, is just plain wrong.

Justine Greening said there were merely «pockets» of people who do not support the current LGBT agenda - and they should be opposed by the Government.

They are: rationalization, which tends toward sterile intellectualization and robs life of its character and vitality; estheticism, which cuts off true communication by maintaining an esthetic distance in order to dominate, rather than to support, others; capitalism, which tends to deper - sonalize people by providing for their hedonistic needs in order to support production and consumption regardless of its human utility; and nationalism, which tends to make national things sacred and in doing so to create idols out of them.31.