Not exact matches
It's like
cargo cults: You're just
doing what you see without understanding what happens behind the scenes that creates the results.
Did you look up the
cargo cults?
That was the original premise for
cargo cult, in that primitive people would
do weird stuff with found objects.
Any
cargo cult climastrologist can
do it.
How
does one distinguish between science and pseudoscience, between true science and
cargo -
cult science?
When someone
does face it, it is increasingly likely that it will show their work to go down as
cargo -
cult science.
Contrarians are fond of citing his strictures on
cargo cult science (in some cases I have to admit because it always gets a rise out of me when I find it) but in fact they are the
cargo cultists (he was referring to engineers and administrators who didn't want to admit that an o ring could freeze and break, and the like, because they were wedded to their ideas).