I think the most common conception of what is happening here is that the «mean men of the Vatican» are
doing evil against the «poor old ladies» of the LCWR.
Not exact matches
When someone calls that Imam one of the most
evil people on the planet, when someone says he wants to build his center to train terrorists, when someone calls for amending the constitution to exclude Islam, when someone says our founding fathers wanted this to be a Christian nation and that they didn't want Muslims included, when Muslims are afraid to go out because they will be attacked, when Christian pastors are preaching
against Muslims (as opposed to the belief in Islam), THAT is hatred.
39:32 — Then, who
does more wrong than one who utters a lie
against Allah, and denies the truth [this Quran, the Prophet (Muhammad SAW, and Jesus the Son of Marry), the Islamic Monotheism, the Resurrection and the reward or punishment according to good or
evil deeds] when it comes to him!
Christianity doesn't cause «reigious wars», people taking land that other people think belongs to them and countries supporting equally
evil terrorism
against other terrorists cause «religious wars».
I
do know that many of these disasters that are happening lately are because some people are supporting Liberal Democrat Politicians who in turn faciliate
evil laws that are
against God.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is
against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.28 And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to
do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 backbiters, hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of
evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, covenant - breakers, without natural affection, unmerciful: 32 who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practise such things are worthy of death, not only
do the same, but also consent with them that practise them.
If you
do know
evil then you should know what your running
against in OBAMA > For he is pure
evil.
It's a way to justify what you don't yet understand, rather than acknowledging that it's just understandable at the moment, and it's acceptance amongst those who think like they
do, it's the creation of a definable «
evil» to fight
against (satan, atheists, other religions, basically everyone except their small group of like minders... even other denominations that are nearly identical quibble).
The truth is inescapable: «
Against you, you alone, have I sinned, and
done what is
evil in your sight» (v. 4).
I
did not say that you tend to speak
against evil but you are saying that I have.
Furthermore, Wesley argued (
against Reformed doctrine) that Christians could enjoy entire sanctification in this life: loving God and their neighbors, meekness and lowliness of heart, abstaining from all appearance of
evil, and
doing all for the glory of God.
I don't have to «start» teaching that abuse is
evil and that victims are innocent of the crime
against them.
no real Christian would advocate murder though and it is in no way an indictment
against God, he gave us free will to
do good, not
evil.
What snap you fingers, no baby bottle, no teenagers, no old people, no opportunity to test yourself
against good or
evil, no acquired knowledge handed down over generations so you get to
do all over again and again from scratch.
Adnama Satan uses external circumstances to direct our steps he knows that if we walk according to the flesh we come under his authority for the flesh is weak and he manipulates by keeping christians in bondage to sin through lust or whatever sin the christian is weak in.He can also fire into our minds
evil thoughts to make us feel condemned or guilty these are fiery darts they are not ours and we need to stand on the word to rebuke them by faith.If we have given our lives to Christ then we belong to Christ so if we walk in accordance to the spirit the enemy has not power to effect us either internally or externally that is not to say that he can not manipulate situations and circumstances to his advantage that is why we need to be alert and pray
against the work that he
does we are in a spiritual battle but we have overcome in Christ so fear not brentnz
So if that is the case, why
do I have such a humanitarian heart, compassion to those that are even of
evil doing, forgiving to those who
do wrongs
against me, and why is my conversations on issues in my life with Christ the utmost civil and peaceful?
My contention is that this places Ivan's sensibility much nearer to the authentic vision of the New Testament than are many of the more pious and conventional forms of Christian conviction today The gospel of the ancient church was always one of rebellion
against those principalities and powers — death chief among them — that enslave and torment creation; nowhere
does the New Testament rationalize
evil or accord it necessity or treat it as part of the necessary fabric of God's world.
It contains chapters on the reliability of the Bible, what Christians can
do to stand
against the challenges of postmodernism, Atheism, Islam, and other key apologetical issues (e.g., the problem of
evil).
I got up, dusted myself off, remembered the Lords prayer to forgive others their trespasses
against us, so it
does not lead us into
evil temptations and resumed my life.
And all the Christians haters of whom think that because people take a stand
against what THEY think is right you are not better then they for calling them «haters,
evil etc.» because they
do not agree with your position.
Some argue that humanity
did have a free will before Adam and Eve rebelled
against God and fell into sin by eating fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and
Evil.
You say your god has turned
against this world due to the
evil within it... so then your god is not so caring after all or it simply
does not exist (the more likely explanation).
5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath
against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God; 6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds: 7 To them who by patient continuance in well
doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life: 8 But unto them that are contentious, and
do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, 9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth
evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile; Romans 2:1 - 9 (KJV)
We have a much greater weapon
against evil spirits than those who think their rituals
do anything — and that weapon is prayer.
And to face the consequences of wrong
doing and fight
against evil and for justice for all, then we all will be in a better place.
For if
evil, in Buber's conception, is rebellion
against God with the power He has given man to
do evil, good is the turning toward God with this same power.
Jesus said that those who speak in His Name would be hated and all sorts of
evil will be spoken
against them... because they
do the works of THEIR father, the devil.
If they have truly corrupted the law by their
evil interpretation of it, why
do not the scholars and masses and other Islamic countries revolt
against the so called blasphemic interpretation you are describing.
If they forget the source of their power, if they rebel
against God, if they no longer act as God's deputies, if instead of rewarding good conduct and punishing
evil conduct they
do the reverse, they must be resisted.
«He who
does evil or acts unjustly
against himself, then asks pardon of God, will find God forgiving, merciful.
This
does not make God responsible for
evil, for God never wills or wants anything that is
against goodness, justice, truth, and beauty.
The high moral standard (love your enemy and
do good to those who
do evil to you) was unattainable (and obviously unacceptable as well) by Jefferson — who was in fact in rebellion
against a government in which the Bible demands he should have been submissive and subject to.
Actually I don't have bad thoughts
against them, I hear in my mind a voice that Jesus
evil or god and I can't stop it, I don't want to think it actually.
Kaiser's answer is that God
did command the Israelites to practice genocide
against the Canaanites, but this is only because the Canaanites were so
evil (p. 29 - 30).
04: I sinned
against you alone, my
evil done in your sight.
So when one Christian accuses a church leader of
doing something
evil or wrong, the pastor often feels justified in retorting the same way Jesus
did, and accuses his accusers of committing a sin
against the Holy Spirit.
If someone regards abortion as a moral
evil and same - sex marriage as an oxymoron, as I
do, he can not say so in a public forum, for it amounts to a sin
against dialogue.
We can appreciate the Christian absolutist who seeks to stand wholly
against involvement in the
evil of society; yet as he
does so he must realize that those who are working for relative gains within the social order are
doing a necessary work in the service of God.
The word of the LORD came to Zechariah, saying: Thus says the LORD of hosts: Render true judgments, show kindness and mercy to one another;
do not oppress the widow, the orphan, the alien, or the poor; and
do not devise
evil in your hearts
against one another.
So let me try and get this straight, if religious doctrine
does not define some practice as
against the law or
evil but yet the laity performs these unlawful acts, it keeps the church free from culpability?
But your English Bibles were translated by Followers of the Devil who blasphemed
against Holy Spirit Yahweh, and mistranslated that as» I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create
evil: I the LORD
do all these.»
Against thee, thee alone, have I
done what is
evil in thy sight, so that thou art right when thou speakest, and just when thou dost condemn (Ps.51: 1 - 4).
His accusers raised a large number of baseless and patently false accusations
against Him, then felt that it was necessary to expel His
evil from their midst, and they
did all this in obedience to the command of God (so they claimed).
I've never once heard a sermon preached on the passage in which Paul tells Titus «Cretans are always liars,
evil brutes, lazy gluttons» (Titus 1:12 — 13), and yet, if these words are truly the inerrant and unchanging words of God intended as universal commands for all people in all places at all times, then the Christian community needs to
do a better job of mobilizing
against the Cretan people, perhaps constructing some «God Hates Cretans» signs!
Jesus articulated it in the Sermon on the Mount: «Don't react violently
against the one who is
evil.»
They are not afraid to speak
evil of dignitaries, whereas angels, who are greater in power and might,
do not bring a reviling accusation
against them before the Lord.
He permits
evil, even though he
does not cause it, and he is not personally engaged in the moment - by - moment struggle
against it.
If you would fight
against evil, then you'd better
do something about your normal human tendency to make mistakes in judgment.
Otherwise you might easily
do horrible and
evil things in your so - called «fight
against evil».
Specifically, why
does Plantinga contend that to retain justified theistic belief in the face of
evil, a theist need only defend herself
against external attack?