Sentences with phrase «doing heavy volume»

Investorfuse is very expensive and unless you're doing heavy volume and can't customise podio yourself I'd avoid it.

Not exact matches

All the main stock market indexes plunged at least 2 % on heavy volume on January 24, but how much did that really affect the «big picture» of the overall market trend?

I've generally enjoyed Vega brand and use it in my Homemade Protein Bars, but it does have additional ingredients beyond protein and it's much heavier by volume than collagen protein.

As you can see this workout is very intense and because of the high volume work you'll need to lower the weights.After the third work day, rest for two days.You should eat about 3 hours before this workout and do some heavy (but clean) eating after the workout.This means that you should eat lots of protein (around 1.5 g / lb a day) from lean meats, eggs, fish, low fat milk and nuts.As for the carbs — eat low glycemic carbs through out the day and a big meal of high glycemic carbs along with protein right after the workout.

The line between training with heavy and light weights have been blurred by a recent study which showed that subjects that did high - rep sets (around 30 reps) to failure experienced gains in muscle mass similar to group that trained heavy using 6 - 8 reps.. The higher training volume is, logically, an aerobic challenge which causes a higher caloric burn during one workout, thus keeping you lean and athletic in the process.

This is the one activity in a gym that requires you to keep up on the volume and rest patterns that come with most strength workouts and require heavy lifting, but don't actually exhaust you to the degree that your muscles give out.

Since a given volume of muscle is heavier than a given volume of fat, don't worry about your body weight.

T - nation recommends doing a volume deload if you are training for strength as you can continue to stay in touch with the heavy loads while reducing the intensity on your body.

For reducing training volume, instead of doing the 9 - 12 heavy sets on your lower body workouts, you can just stick to 3 sets of squats for an example.

The Rock's trainer says it's not about doing heavy weight, it's about volume.

Most children and teenagers can do a simple fast, although heavy volume athletics may compromise this.

In other words, working with heavy weights and hitting optimal weekly volume is more important than the number of workouts you do.

They also did a session (30WM) with the explicit purpose of lifting light weights but matching the volume of the heavy - weight session, which — as we'd expect — wasn't as effective at stimulating protein synthesis.

i would like to add more volume but even high reps while not heavy still drains the system if one can do it 6 days thats impressive i think that would take some time though,,, if i missed anything hit me back and ask... i started to see this girl ihad falling out with a month ago today she has a baby squirrel I'm on Facebook you got ta see this sqirrrell its a real pet DAVID DICICCO TROY MI IS MY FACEBOOK PEACE

It's primary in that I'm also always working on much heavier strongman work and I'm also working on different types of cardiovascular capacity so the high volume workouts that I do are not just limited to kettlebells, but they'll also involve barbells, dumbbells, bodyweight, sledgehammers, cables, maces, and strongman work for instance super high rep tire flipping, sled dragging, heavy bag punching, etc..

i hcve 2 leg days one is squats sets of 20 down to 12 my goal is 6 to 8 sets till failure then leg press 20 to 40 rep sets 6sets then ham curls 10 to 15 reps 6 sets my next leg day is leg press or the icariann plate loaded leg press i do 50 to 60 rep sets with different foot positions every 15 reps, then 1 leg presses rest pause sets of ten only 10 seconds rest at this point i quit counting just go go, this leg press session is a half - hour not much rest and no knee pain I'm not going heavy it compliments my heavy squat day my other parts are done in similar fashion, i don't consider this a heavy light split, its more of a kind of heavy 1 day then moderate high rep next session for those that need a label i really feel this is awesome I've lowered my testosterone dose to 300 mg every 10 days remember im44 not 24 lol i can claim trt my point is i believe I've conditioned myself much more with michaels theories but to take my body to the next level i need to add more volume and excersise variance, i plan on competing within a year, thanks corey for your support i don know if we should post out training since its not according to michaels routine i would continue to hear about your ideas, progress, your like me always searching as you get older safety and longevity are paramount, at the same time we want to kickass and make gains its addictive if you want i can leave my number corey take care and i wish everyone good luck and good health!!!!!!

It requires a lot more energy and does a lot more damage doing say, 10 × 10 (or your 15 × 5), than it does doing one set of 25 - 50 or 50 - 100 reps.. In the end, you get less hypertrophy with high volume heavy lifting, because a) you still have all that myostatin buildup from heavy lifting suppressing hypertrophy, b) you don't sufficiently fatigue medium and fast twitch fibers, c) you don't get the increased IGF - 1 production and increased protein synthesis that you would get from high reps, and d) because the energy requirements of repairing the damage caused by heavy lifting are too high.

Doing very heavy, not your 1RM, but still one big lift and you'll get the required volume, while you'll still be reaching muscle fiber fatigue that's required to maximize muscle growth - all of this done without the joint / connective tissue and neural health drawbacks.

In order to do this you need to split the compound lifts of your training into 2 segments: the volume / density segment and the heavy segment.

The «heavy» factor is easy with singles training, the problem is volume because doing 20 reps with 1RM will cause injury.

Doing some lighter - weight, high - rep sets is an easy way to add mote volume while accumulating less fatigue than super heavy sets.

BLS does include more lower - rep heavy weight lifting than most programs, but it's also usually less volume.

i love lifting heavy and in my exhaustive research i came accross an overarching rule that said that the higher the volume and intensity of workouts, the less frequent i can do them.

Note that muscle is a lot heavier than the same volume of fat, meaning that you can put on a few pounds of muscle with few noticeable changes to your body, since those muscular changes can (and often do) happen in the deep muscle tissue such as the hip floor or the muscles that are in charge of spinal integrity.

Imagine a frock with loaded volume, heavy embroideries and mesmerising cuts, complemented by a smart pencil trouser that does sound inspiring.

It isn't heavy enough for regular use for me personally but it does give crazy volume.

Use a volumizing shampoo and conditioner to amp up your hair's natural volume so it doesn't look heavy.

HERE»S WHAT I DO N'T LIKE: Loud wind noise (anytime I exceed 40 - 45 mph), makes it hard to hear the radio at normal volume; intrusive road noise, which I corrected by swapping out the standard Goodyear tires with Continental tires; lackluster acceleration for a V6 engine, CVT tends to lose momentum when you lift your foot off of the gas pedal — often jerky when accelerating and decelerating while in motion and when accelerating from a dead stop; as mentioned by another reviewer, accelerator hesitates before catching when shifting from reverse to drive; bumps in the road are not well absorbed (the 2016 model may have addressed this issue); no power to windows after you shut off the engine; no auto door locks; poor V6 fuel efficiency averaging around 24 MPGs combined; trunk lid's arms and safety feature makes it heavy and sometimes hard to lift open; Infotainment system does understand most voice commands; and Harmon Kardon speakers are sometimes crackly.

Quality on both cars is excellent but attention to detail is heavy on the Zest, like the doors autolock even after you open them, audio system volume increases with speed (decreases when you go into reverse), tachometer needle glows when you reach the redline, double cranking doesn't happen with the fuel and temperature meters blinking when you try, etc..

Specifically, bear markets don't typically end in a crescendo of fear and panic, but more often on a feeling of «despair and disillusionment,» while strong bull markets tend to feature heavy trading volume.

Wili: As ice volume decreases, the fraction of volume which is new ice increases, and hence the year to year variability in new ice becomes a larger fraction of the total ice volume variability, so I don't think the smoothed downward slope will stay as smooth, i.e. you should expect bigger surprises to the upside on a given winter if it is cold and has heavy snow fall.

Since global warming is the result of contra - natural processes (mostly of human - origin such as the chemical - industry / heavy - industry / carbo - engines etc.) which destabilize the entire global NATURAL balance, the only answer is not inducing artificial unnatural substances in natures elements (this only aggravates the problem or start new ones... extreme measures always do), but introduce and indeed increase the volume and mass of natural plankton.

What they have actually done is taken out the whole heavy volume of the real gas atmosphere and replaced it with empty space populated by these imaginary «ideal gas».

By doing so you might learn along the way the real valid physics of heat transfer in fluid dynamics which is how we get out great wind and weather systems from the equator to the poles, because you would then understand that the atmosphere around us is a heavy voluminous fluid and the dynamics of heat transfer in this is by convection which is what wind is, created out of differential heating of volumes of this fluid.

They, AGWSF fisics, doesn't have the real volume of gas Air which is a fluid in the real world, in real world science it is not empty space, but a heavy ocean of gas weighing down on us a ton on our shoulders.

The air around being colder therefore denser and heavier, with more condensed volume, will sink; gravity having less of a grip on the hotter less dense rising expanding lighter volume with less mass than it does on the denser colder heavier with more mass.

It doesn't need a heavier volume to sink first to make it rise.

So on condensation, under the still rising hotter lighter air carrying on doing its thing and perhaps adding new layers, there would be the accompanying volume and temperature decrease of that first previously rising lighter volume now heavier liquid water and added to by the adjacent volumes of heavier colder air flowing beneath the still rising lighter hotter and into the space now available on condensation of its neighbour, which all now being heavier will increase the pressure at the surface as they all sink together displacing the lighter.

So these real gases have individual volumes which expand and condense and as they do this they become lighter and heavier than air.

Ideal gas which has no mass therefore no weight under gravity because there is nothing on which gravity can pull; which has no volume therefore does not expand or condense changing its weight under reduced and increased pressure or heat and cold and so does not become lighter or heavier than air under gravity; with no attraction therefore merely capable of bouncing off another and not capable of undergoing chemical changes, such as water and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere forming carbonic acid.

CL at # 45 wrote: «As ice volume decreases, the fraction of volume which is new ice increases, and hence the year to year variability in new ice becomes a larger fraction of the total ice volume variability, so I don't think the smoothed downward slope will stay as smooth, i.e. you should expect bigger surprises to the upside on a given winter if it is cold and has heavy snow fall.»

Not only do some deal in heavier volume and can transfer those savings to their customers, some companies simply have more money than others.

The tablet is a little heavy and bulky, looking more like a tablet from two years ago than one from today, but it does the job, and the phone is in good working order, with good power and volume button placement on the right side.

We did notice some distortion during bass - heavy music, as well as some rattling in the system's chassis, but slightly reducing the volume solved these problems.

The little box pushes an astounding amount of air through its 5.25 - inch driver and produces a rich, bass - heavy sound that doesn't distort at its highest volume.

Any bass - heavy track sounds fine, and the lows do come through as the volume increases, making for a very solid listening experience.

AccuEQ room correction does all the heavy lifting, calculating speaker distances and volume levels automatically.

Since the G4, LG has taken a step back from their previously extra heavy post-processing methods and finally allowed a bit of natural noise to come into the frame when needed, and the details in the photos speak volumes about what this type of easing up can do for the quality of shots in general.

On the MateBook X is you turn the speakers up full volume there's a still a lot of distortion that destroys the experience and playing bass - heavy tracks will do the same: Dolby Atmos Sound System isn't a magic bullet in that sense, it still has limitations.

The Verse handle dynamics surprisingly well; slower cuts like Imogen Heap's Hide and Seek don't reveal any annoying DSP hiss, and you can crank the volume up to max without causing distortion (except on really intense stuff, like heavy metal or dubstep).